It was not.No Really, A Rematch , because it wasnt that one sided
Yes but look at it this way...Luke Rockhold gossiping like a teenage girl lol.
The superior athlete isn't always the A-side. Khabib needs to understand his place at the table, his previous ppv did 350k. Khabib needs to use his leverage to dictate where/when the fight takes places. A rematch in Russia is where the legacy money is.
But if a requirement is his check surpasses McGregor's - negotiations are over before they even started.
He passes on a rematch with McGregor ... How many buys, and what's that check look like, with a Nurmagomedov/Ferguson title fight?
I disagree with your scoringIt was not.
R1 Khabib 10-9
R2 Khabib 10-8
R3 Conor 10-9
I have no idea why people act like Khabib won every second of that fight. MMA fans have to be the most uneducated and uninformed bunch of any large sport ever.
That's actually pretty accurate scoring. Khabib was out struck in the third. Conor didn't land anything significant, but he did score more. And while Khabib tired Conor out attempting his takedowns in the third, he didn't get any in the round.I disagree with your scoring
All 3 cageside judges agree with my scoringI disagree with your scoring
He got one but Conor got right back up from it.And while Khabib tired Conor out attempting his takedowns in the third, he didn't get any in the round.
Because they've never been wrong before.All 3 cageside judges agree with my scoring
You're right but they should be using more than basic 101 negotiation tactics.Yes but look at it this way...
They are positioning to negotiate from a position of power. Its basic negotiation 101
He isnt going to say "Well we are the B side so we will take what we can get"
I'm also intrigued how he will adapt a new strategywould be interesting to see how Conor conducts himself if a rematch were to take place
Probably similar to second Diaz fight. Don't be so aggressive, pick his shots better, point fight instead of going for the kill.I'm also intrigued how he will adapt a new strategy