Sports NFL 2024-25 Official Thread

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up

Chrit

RdotC
Aug 13, 2024
1,298
1,105
What is Expected Points Added?


Expected Points Added, commonly referred to as EPA, is a measure of how well a team performs relative to expectation. For example, if a team starts a drive on the 50-yard line, its expected points to start the drive would be about 2.5. If the team ends the drive with a field goal, thus gaining 3 points, its EPA for that drive would be found by subtracting its expected points from how many points it actually gained, 3 – 2.5 or 0.5 EPA.


This same logic can be applied to individual plays. Say the Chiefs start with the ball first-and-10 from their 25-yard line, where its expected points would be about 1.06. If Patrick Mahomes throws a 15-yard completion, making it first-and-10 on the KC 40-yard line, where the expected points is now 1.88, the EPA of that play would be 1.88 – 1.06 or 0.82. In other words, that completion increased the Chiefs’ expected points on that drive by just over three-fourths of a point. If Mahomes was sacked for a 10-yard loss instead of the completion, making it second-and-20 from their own 15, the new expected points would be about -0.54 and the EPA for that play would be -0.54 – 1.06 or -1.6. This means the sack decreased the amount of points the Chiefs were expected to score on that drive by 1.6 points.


TLDR: EPA is nerd shit... created by nerds... for nerds to consume.
 

NotBanjaxo

Formerly someone other than Banjaxo
Nov 16, 2019
9,188
18,759
What is Expected Points Added?


Expected Points Added, commonly referred to as EPA, is a measure of how well a team performs relative to expectation. For example, if a team starts a drive on the 50-yard line, its expected points to start the drive would be about 2.5. If the team ends the drive with a field goal, thus gaining 3 points, its EPA for that drive would be found by subtracting its expected points from how many points it actually gained, 3 – 2.5 or 0.5 EPA.


This same logic can be applied to individual plays. Say the Chiefs start with the ball first-and-10 from their 25-yard line, where its expected points would be about 1.06. If Patrick Mahomes throws a 15-yard completion, making it first-and-10 on the KC 40-yard line, where the expected points is now 1.88, the EPA of that play would be 1.88 – 1.06 or 0.82. In other words, that completion increased the Chiefs’ expected points on that drive by just over three-fourths of a point. If Mahomes was sacked for a 10-yard loss instead of the completion, making it second-and-20 from their own 15, the new expected points would be about -0.54 and the EPA for that play would be -0.54 – 1.06 or -1.6. This means the sack decreased the amount of points the Chiefs were expected to score on that drive by 1.6 points.


TLDR: EPA is nerd shit... created by nerds... for nerds to consume.
 

Rambo John J

Baker Team
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
76,113
75,381
View attachment 136520

Jameis Winston: Literally incapable of going through progressions.
Naw that chart is BS, some cherrypicked stats
Some of those QBs do read the field well and it shows they don't, and some that is shows read the field are horrible post snap diagnosing QBs.

Yes EPA has a lot to do with things out of the QBs control, more of a team stat
 
Last edited: