Open the doors , they are coming
- Thread starter Hong Kong Phooey
- Start date
RIP Pam
- Jan 14, 2015
- 12,562
- 17,003
I can't figure Kirik out. Best guess is he's just a guy whose site ran away with itself.
Then again the karma system was a BAD decision as was telling people top men were on stuff. Shit never gets sorted over there.
I think the real reason it'll never be updated is everywhere else in the Internet is free and he just can't let the revenue go or doesn't know how to actually end it fairly as realistically the entire site needs rebooting.
Hopefully TOP MEN will always be on hand here.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
Then again the karma system was a BAD decision as was telling people top men were on stuff. Shit never gets sorted over there.
I think the real reason it'll never be updated is everywhere else in the Internet is free and he just can't let the revenue go or doesn't know how to actually end it fairly as realistically the entire site needs rebooting.
Hopefully TOP MEN will always be on hand here.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
Think that guy is here already.
If "dutch" shows up here and you let him in, I am going to blow a FUCKING GASKET!!!
M
member 3289
Guest
Not trying to play devil's advocate or anything, but this is a terrible idea.
Just because a guy was an asshole on one forum doesn't mean he's gonna be an asshole on another. There's a chance, albeit a slim one, that a person can change, especially when in a positive environment like this place.
There are some people who will always be assholes or trolls, but they should at least be given a chance before getting shit-canned.
definitely agree with this. Let anyone sign up. If they break the rules then can them, but don't make an assumption of how someone will post here, based on that pile of shit of a forum. If people are kept from joining just because someone doesn't like them, then, this place isn't much better than the other. You can't talk about certain things over there, but only certain people can talk about things over here. Not a nice idea.
A friend of mine was showing me clips of a JRE podcast that took place some time this past summer briefly and I didn't catch the two dudes names or what episode it was but they were bagging on the ug HARD. You guys should check it out. All I remember is that one of the dudes looked pedoish and the other one was a dead ringer for Sean Astin, you know the guy who played Rudy Ruttiger.
Goddammit you sn tricked me and I thought cruz signed up. Either way. Welcome
I've invited a few of my bros over to really make it a party.
Winston Wolf
If it ain't Dutch
Time travelling twelver
Orcus
Ausghpict
Winston Wolf
If it ain't Dutch
Time travelling twelver
Orcus
Ausghpict
Just keep the obvious bait/anger/derail trolls off here.
People know who they are, some people find them funny if they aren't derailing your threads or you don't use a forum as often as regulars who do.
This is my personal line, you derail, bait or spazz at people to create conflict, you're useless to me.
CRE and SuperCalo are one thing, if they cross the line they're both reasonable enough when a mod tells them to heel. The others, don't care, they just want to watch forums burn.
People know who they are, some people find them funny if they aren't derailing your threads or you don't use a forum as often as regulars who do.
This is my personal line, you derail, bait or spazz at people to create conflict, you're useless to me.
CRE and SuperCalo are one thing, if they cross the line they're both reasonable enough when a mod tells them to heel. The others, don't care, they just want to watch forums burn.
but how do you know they will troll over here? maybe that will be their playground. If they troll here, ban them, but to keep them from signing up just seems a little childish-you can't play with my ball sort of thing. Censoring who can join just seems against the spirit of the board.
M
member 3289
Guest
Exactly. Everyone has to be given a clean slate when joining here.
If they fuck up here, then deal with them accordingly, but even if they were the most hateful fuckhead of a troll on another site, they at least deserve the opportunity to prove that they're still the same fuckhead before they're bant.
I mean,
@sheefer is probably the dumbest motherfucker I know. I know for a fact that he will add absolutely nothing of value to this forum. NOTHING. But that inbred son of a bitch still deserves to be somebody that no one will ever remember.
Give them a chance, but if they prove that is what they want to do, then the banhammer needs to come down.
It sure as hell is what got me to come back. I don't like helping BLAF pay for driveway snow, & I'm tired of shills & boardroom fanbois.
I'll always post there, but they'll never see another dime from me again.
Most of us have, to various degrees, but some of them are serial offenders & possible Zuffa shills.
This forum has a cool, friendly, happy vibe where as the other one stinks like a fart in a car with the windows rolled up.
I would hate to see certain members of that other board tard the place up.
Either way, I trust the mods will do the right thing.
My issue comes down to the whole 'fighterbashing' thing on mma.com. I'm assuming you guys likewise are adopting that rule but I'd make sure that you understand what it means in it's most fundamental sense because Kirik and co certainly dont. Its a noble and honorable rule to uphold but I feel due to interpretation and plain old human nature things can get complicated when it comes time to actually modulate. To be honest, I think the only things that should considered violations/offenses are the things pertaining to a fighter's personal lives that most would consider a 'low blow' or somehow detrimental. I'm not saying this because I think fighters need to be subject to shit talking but I do feel like if you dont enforce the rule in an absolute manner, its totally worthless and used at the discretion of one person or a group of person's opinion/tastes as a fan/fans.
Fighterbashing is fighterbashing regardless of how you feel about a particular fighter or that fighter's actions or comments. You've gotta be consistent, whatever the case when modding a forum like this. Check the UG right now and I guarantee you there are tons of threads bashing certain fighters where post after post is technically a violation. It doesn't matter if everyone agrees that Rampage acts like a baby or Conor is arrogant or the Diaz bros act like thugs if you are truly implementing the no fighterbashing rule.
Then there are a group of fighters who are deemed untouchable and the minute you say anything negative about them, you get suspended or banned. You can't base how you are going to implement a rule like that on the fighter's personality or how they act. Thats just asinine.There isn't a certain amount of silliness that Ronda can say where you go, 'ok well she went and said this ridiculous statement to mmaweekly and therefore we will allow people to ridicule her/talk shit on her in this thread on the matter this time.' I know that sounds dumb and would make any forum heavily censored but its the only way that rule should be used which is why I think it should be done away with. My favorite fighters (again barring deeply personal shit) I like to think anyways would be unphased by comments/criticisms made by keyboard warriors. This sport is after all all bout who and who aren't some of the baddest people on the earth are at the end of the day.
Fighterbashing is fighterbashing regardless of how you feel about a particular fighter or that fighter's actions or comments. You've gotta be consistent, whatever the case when modding a forum like this. Check the UG right now and I guarantee you there are tons of threads bashing certain fighters where post after post is technically a violation. It doesn't matter if everyone agrees that Rampage acts like a baby or Conor is arrogant or the Diaz bros act like thugs if you are truly implementing the no fighterbashing rule.
Then there are a group of fighters who are deemed untouchable and the minute you say anything negative about them, you get suspended or banned. You can't base how you are going to implement a rule like that on the fighter's personality or how they act. Thats just asinine.There isn't a certain amount of silliness that Ronda can say where you go, 'ok well she went and said this ridiculous statement to mmaweekly and therefore we will allow people to ridicule her/talk shit on her in this thread on the matter this time.' I know that sounds dumb and would make any forum heavily censored but its the only way that rule should be used which is why I think it should be done away with. My favorite fighters (again barring deeply personal shit) I like to think anyways would be unphased by comments/criticisms made by keyboard warriors. This sport is after all all bout who and who aren't some of the baddest people on the earth are at the end of the day.