Some of that doesn't add up, however if Trump was told "Listen fuckface, you can't do this" and did it anyways, then he absolutely shouldn't be allowed to run again.nah, Eastman's lawyer friend told him that he better get a good fucken lawyer after January 6th lol
Eastman went on to plead the 5th over 100 times lol
the main people today were Pence's advisor and some Judge that i think was part of Trump's team. i cant recall specifically
it was pretty bad for trump tho
- he was told numerous times that they couldnt reject the electors
- Trump had a 1 on 1 with Pence where he said "if they say you have the power to do it, wouldnt that be cool?" Pence replied that "no. it wouldnt be cool. no single persons should have the power to reject the legal votes of americans"
- Trump published something saying that Pence and his teams both agree that Pence can reject the electors
- Pence's team reached out to Trumps team like "wtf. thats the exact opposite of what we said"
- Trump continued to pressure Pence in tweets leading up to January 6th
- rioters breeched the capital
- Pence barely escaped the rioters (they were within 40 feet of him). he got down to loading dock/parking spot
- Trump found out the capital was breached and published another tweet saying that Pence let down America
- Secret Service told everyone to get in the cars because they were fucked. so most of Pence's team got in the cars
- Pence refused to leave, saying that he wouldnt give the rioters the satisfaction of scaring him out of the capital on the day he would approve the next president
- Pence then went back inside and did it after the capital was cleared
something like that
also worth noting that Proud Boys have confessed to having plans to kill Pence if they had found him
thats the main gist of days 2 and 3Some of that doesn't add up, however if Trump was told "Listen fuckface, you can't do this" and did it anyways, then he absolutely shouldn't be allowed to run again.
Also, Pence is a gangster.
and i stand by the fact that Trump should have been removed from office back when he told Ukrianina president he would withhold the funds unless he investigated Biden
“Look, I never talked to the president from the position of a quid pro quo,” Zelensky said.
i heard the phone call. there was definitely a quid-pro-quoZelensky Criticizes ‘Fairness’ of Withholding Aid, Claims No Quid Pro Quo
Trump heard what he wanted in the new statement from Ukraine’s president.nymag.com
Hey @ConorMcGregorNutHugger this guy says Zelensky is a liar.i heard the phone call. there was definitely a quid-pro-quo
Zelensky is an unreliable narrator because he is at the whim of recieving aid from Trump, who was president at the time he made that statement
Z is the last guy anybody should trust...he is protected and projected by the highest of highi heard the phone call. there was definitely a quid-pro-quo
Zelensky is an unreliable narrator because he is at the whim of recieving aid from Trump, who was president at the time he made that statement
That all is contingent on the victim feeling pressured. He said he wasn't. The end.Since 2014, the United States has provided nearly $1.5 billion worth of military aid to Ukraine to help them fight off Russia which invaded the country in August of that year.
By July 2019, the Trump Administration had not delivered nearly $400 million in US support – including weapons, training and advisors – that Congress had previously approved for Ukraine’s continued efforts.
On July 25th, 2019, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky asked about the aid on a phone call with President Trump, to which Trump now infamously responded, “I want you to do us a favor though.” Trump asked the Ukrainian President to investigate Vice President Joe Biden – a potential political opponent in the 2020 presidential election. Withholding desperately-needed military aid for a political favor is, by definition, a quid pro quo.
On September 26, 2019, the White House released a summary of the phone call that confirms President Trump’s effort to pressure the Ukrainian president into searching for political dirt on Vice President Joe Biden.
On October 17, 2019, Mick Mulvaney, President Trump’s acting Chief of Staff, admitted at a White House news conference that President Trump froze the military aid in an effort to pressure Ukraine into investigating Democrats. After confirming the existence of a quid pro quo, Mulvaney said: “Get over it.”
Based purely on what you've told me, it's not clear yet, but it ain't looking good.in terms of today, its very clear that Trump attempted a political coup
he is a disgusting human. granted, we already knew that
Isn't that what politics is about?attempted a political coup
You should listen to the hearings. It's alot different hearing Trumps own team explain what he did as opposed to reading notes that a known anti-trump, progressive TMMACer casually threw togetherBased purely on what you've told me, it's not clear yet, but it ain't looking good.
No. Corporations have a strangle hold on campaign financing due to the republican appointed Supreme Court justices ruling on Citizens UnitedIsn't that what politics is about?
This is another event in a long line of such behavior.
Oh, I understand. I'm not even saying your summary is inaccurate. But so far a lot of the smoking gun evidence comes from people whom would be deemed to be a dubious relevance in a criminal case.You should listen to the hearings. It's alot different hearing Trumps own team explain what he did as opposed to reading notes that a known anti-trump, progressive TMMACer casually threw together
You have to hear them say how they told trump over and over he lost. How denying electors is "fuckin crazy"
I love how you have absolutely no clue what is going on with these hearings...... yet you've spent the last 16 months shilling for these cunts, parroting their bullshit about these being sham hearings, and reciting all of Tucker's canned lines about how nothing that happened on Jan 6 was important at all, nobody really did much of anything wrong, and there isn't a real, continuing and serious attempt to dismantle American democracy which is still being backed by the great majority of the Republican Party.Who's testimony was it? Eastman?
Sounds like shady politician shit.No. Corporations have a strangle hold on campaign financing due to the republican appointed Supreme Court justices ruling on Citizens United
It's corrupt. But it's legal
What Trump tried to do was reject the vote of the American people. That's illegal
Today, it was stated that Pence said his speech at the Federalist society was going to be the most important thing he ever said.
And what he said there was that Trumps idea that he had the power to overturn the election was undemocratic and unamerican
I'm not sure that will hold upOh, I understand. I'm not even saying your summary is inaccurate. But so far a lot of the smoking gun evidence comes from people whom would be deemed to be a dubious relevance in a criminal case.
That being said, given that Amerca's Mayor was his lawyer, if he told Trump that it was allowed and Trump was following the advice of his lawyer, you aren't going to see a lot happen.
That's not what this is about. Elections determine the next presidentSounds like shady politician shit.
So who do we want as the next president? Isn't that what this is about?
Endgame is?
We'll find out soon enough.I'm not sure that will hold up
I understand. But let's say you're like "I' want to buy a boat." 6 people tell you that you can't afford a boat even though you really want one, and 4 people tell you "Fuck yeah, bro. Boats are awesome!" The vast majority of people are going to be buying a boat. It's human nature to put more weight behind the words of people who are siding with you.His own team told him that its retarded to think that a VP alone can determine the next president
Well, not the part where Pelosi royally fucked up. Just the Trump parts.That's not what this is about. Elections determine the next president
these hearings are an investigation into the events lesding up to and during the riot of January 6th