They were a MAJOR threat to democracy!I finally looked up these infamous sit-ins today's
He imagines all kinds of bullshit excuses to give right wing cunts a pass on, well......... everything.Some imagination you have eh genius?
Because it is.I finally looked up these infamous sit-ins today's
Seems apples and oranges to January 6th
Stopping a judge from being appointed is literally interfering with the function of America's democratic system as the hearings are a requirement for a judge to be able to sit.What?
In one situation (sit ins) the capital building was OPEN to the public… in the other situation (J6) it was CLOSED and access was forced through criminal actions.Seems apples and oranges to January 6th
In both actions and potential outcomes.I finally looked up these infamous sit-ins today's
Seems apples and oranges to January 6th
He was trying to troll you into fighting with me. I mentioned that killing a judge is a more direct threat to democracy than J6 would have been even if it had succeeded. No one wants to address that observation on its merit, they want to say "So nothing would have changed if a bunch of politicians got killed?" and a bunch of other strawmen that have nothing to do with the overall point of bringing it up, which is that none of these people actually care about the sacredness of democracy.you brought it up to me, that's how it's part of my discussion
"posters"? I haven't seen anyone say it was a bigger story than the Jan6 mob, but I haven't read everything. I remember when you tried to make that strawman with @BeardOfKnowledge...
So...not actually wrong about it, but even if I was it's a basic logical fallacy to extrapolate it to other subjects or statements.
identity politics gotta identity politic, tho amirite?
Could they have proceeded with the hearings had they wanted to? Or were they running and hiding in fear for their lives?Stopping a judge from being appointed is literally interfering with the function of America's democratic system as the hearings are a requirement for a judge to be able to sit.
January 6 on the other hand would not have prevented the transfer of the presidency even if Pence didn't certify the electors.
He imagines all kinds of bullshit excuses to give right wing cunts a pass on, well......... everything.
That Hunter Biden, tho.
??
Oh yeah, they're the same.Stopping a judge from being appointed is literally interfering with the function of America's democratic system as the hearings are a requirement for a judge to be able to sit.
January 6 on the other hand would not have prevented the transfer of the presidency even if Pence didn't certify the electors.
Succeeded in what exactly?I mentioned that killing a judge is a more direct threat to democracy than J6 would have been even if it had succeeded.
Dammit, fuck you!In one situation (sit ins) the capital building was OPEN to the public… in the other situation (J6) it was CLOSED and access was forced through criminal actions.
Let also look at the charges associated to each event..Dammit, fuck you!
??
Because it has no merit.I mentioned that killing a judge is a more direct threat to democracy than J6 would have been even if it had succeeded. No one wants to address that observation on its merit
Oh but Tucker told him that's just 'cause the system is rigged against good honest white conservative patriots.Let also look at the charges associated to each event..
One had no violence, no theft, no vandalism, no break and enters, no death threats and so on…
The other event is ripe with criminal charges for violence and damage to the building.
At least the rioters had flags.
I’m always surprised by the disrespect shown to the American flag by magatards.Don't forget the Late Show staff almost enabling Armageddon
At least the rioters had flags.
Even if they were being used to beat officers
Don't know. I wasn't in the room.Could they have proceeded with the hearings had they wanted to?