I know you were rooting for Floyd but do you honestly agree with those cards? Especially the 8 to 1? Can you make a compelling argument that Conor truly won only one round in this fight?
I'm genuinely curious.
Round 1, Conor landed 9 out of 34 shots to Floyd's 2 out of 6.
Round 2, Conor landed 8/42 shots out of Floyd's 5/10
Round 3, Conor landed 9/39 to Floyd's 5/12
Obviously Floyd won and the fight went literally exactly as I expected. But how can you post those scorecards as if they mean shit? Like, anyone who somehow thinks Floyd won the first 3 rounds is a crazy person. I feel bad for whoever has those judges assigned to them in the future because those types of scores are so beyond explanation that they end up costing guys title fights in bouts that count.
It's not like Conor was out there destroying Floyd or something early. But you shouldn't win a round for landing 2 of 6 punches, or 5 out of 10, when a guy is throwing/landing more than twice as much. It's not like Floyd landed 5 bombs. Conor simply out landed him in those rounds and won the rounds.
So what does the scorecards prove exactly when they're easily proven to be ludicrous?