Glad you know everything about the case and Florida law. Can't believe your not practicing there since you know so much. Sorry I asked a question and offended your perfect knowledge of the case. Sorry that other posters agreed with me asking these questions and somehow offended you.
if you have a reasonable fear of an actionable threat (seen gun before, person has attacked before, etc). It has to be an actionable threat for SD/Castle Doctrine/SYG to come in to play.
lol wut? I answered questions with accurate information. You seem to be the only one offended.
So you are armchair lawyering and stating it as fact. Got it
I'm also right. Get a lawyer to tell you the same thing, if it helps ease the pain of ignorance.
You haven't posted anything but your opinion, sorry if I question your expertise on Florida law. At least @conor mcgregor nut hugger posted a obvious copy and pasted reply to try and explain the law.
what I have posted is factual. It's not opinion.
You have posted your opinion so far with nothing to back it up but you saying it's true.
should be very easy to show that my opinions are wrong by posting contravening facts.
No I was asking questions, you came in acting as a expert. Sorry I questioned your knowledge of Florida law since you live nowhere near that state but it's a legit question since you are posing as a lawyer now.
wow. the internet must be a scary place if you're unable to make determinations of fact among varying opinions without some sort of appeal to authority to fall back on.
You make claims with no proof. I guess we should just believe whatever you say.
I used to be so rght wing. But man. I fuckin hate guns nowadays. I bailed on grrm book signing bc I just got a bad feeling (since ei have some very very creepy stalkers on YouTube)
if someone is attacking you, or has articulated an actionable threat against your life (or property, depending on state), then Stand Your Ground does not come in to consideration. Your actions are covered by existing statutes on the lawful use of force.
You must have tried to find a actual law to support your claims and found out you have no clue what you are talking about.i can only imagine the travails of a life absent critical thinking.
being actively attacked is covered under the lawful use of force, SYG explicitly removes any duty to retreat in those circumstances.
from a guy who still hasn't read the statute, or any legal opinions on the statute
Laziest fake lawyer ever. I'm sure the law in Arizona and Florida are exactly the same and you Excel at both of them.
good point, it's impossible to be informed on anything that doesn't directly impact your state. You'd think that the law for any state would be freely available, and a person with critical thinking skills could review statutes (for the letter of the law) and case opinions (for the spirit of the law) and come to a conclusion in line with the commonly accepted interpretations of the law.
I am not the one making ridiculous claims with no proof.
which of my claims is ridiculous? What contravening proof have you uncovered in your exhaustive search of Florida case law?
