Justice Department Files Lawsuit Against Crop Production Services Alleging Discrimination Against U.S. WorkersThe White House approved the use of military aircraft for multi-national trips by Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price to Africa and Europe this spring, and to Asia in the summer, at a cost of more than $500,000 to taxpayers.
The overseas trips bring the total cost to taxpayers of Price’s travels to more than $1 million since May, according to a POLITICO review.
Justice Department Files Lawsuit Against Crop Production Services Alleging Discrimination Against U.S. Workers
The Justice Department announced today that it filed a lawsuit against Crop Production Services Inc. (Crop Production), headquartered in Loveland, Colorado, for allegedly discriminating against U.S. workers in violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).
The complaint alleges that in 2016, Crop Production discriminated against at least three United States citizens by refusing to employ them as seasonal technicians in El Campo, Texas, because Crop Production preferred to hire temporary foreign workers under the H-2A visa program. According to the department’s complaint, Crop Production imposed more burdensome requirements on U.S. citizens than it did on H-2A visa workers to discourage U.S. citizens from working at the facility. For instance, the complaint alleges that whereas U.S. citizens had to complete a background check and a drug test before being permitted to start work, H-2A workers were allowed to begin working without completing them and, in some cases, never completed them. The complaint also alleges that Crop Production refused to consider a limited-English proficient U.S. citizen for employment but hired H-2A workers who could not speak English. Ultimately, all of Crop Production’s 15 available seasonal technician jobs in 2016 went to H-2A workers instead of U.S. workers.
Under the INA, it is unlawful for employers to intentionally discriminate against U.S. workers because of their citizenship status or to otherwise favor the employment of temporary foreign workers over available, qualified U.S. workers. In addition, the H-2A visa program requires employers to recruit and hire available, qualified U.S. workers before hiring temporary foreign workers.
“In the spirit of President Trump’s Executive Order on Buy American and Hire American, the Department of Justice will not tolerate employers who discriminate against U.S. workers because of a desire to hire temporary foreign visa holders,” said Attorney General Jeff Sessions. “The Justice Department will enforce the Immigration and Nationality Act in order to protect U.S. workers as they are the very backbone of our communities and our economy. Where there is a job available, U.S. workers should have a chance at it before we bring in workers from abroad.”
The United States’ complaint seeks back pay on behalf of the workers, civil penalties, and other remedial relief to correct and prevent discrimination. The workers have also filed their own private suit, and are represented by Texas RioGrande Legal Aid. Both suits were filed in the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, a specialized administrative court that Congress created to resolve such claims.
The Division’s Immigrant and Employee Rights Section (IER), formerly known as the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices, is responsible for enforcing the anti-discrimination provision of the INA. The statute prohibits, among other things, citizenship status and national origin discrimination in hiring, firing, or recruitment or referral for a fee; unfair documentary practices; retaliation; and intimidation.
This case is part of the Division’s Protecting U.S. Workers Initiative, an initiative aimed at targeting, investigating, and bringing enforcement actions against companies that discriminate against U.S. workers in favor of foreign visa workers.
For more information about protections against employment discrimination under immigration laws, call IER’s worker hotline at 1-800-255-7688 (1-800-237-2515, TTY for hearing impaired); call IER’s employer hotline at 1-800-255-8155 (1-800-237-2515, TTY for hearing impaired); sign up for a free webinar; email English and Spanish websites.
Applicants or employees who believe they were subjected to: different documentary requirements based on their citizenship, immigration status, or national origin; or discrimination based on their citizenship, immigration status or national origin in hiring, firing, or recruitment or referral, should contact IER’s worker hotline for assistance.
Bernie seems to accept the premise that it's the govt's money & we should hope they're benevolent enough let us keep some of it. A person pays tax on the income as it's earned, capital gains tax as it grows, then when they die he thinks the govt. should get 50% of what they couldn't get from them while they were alive. The estate tax is perverse
That was some funny shit. Alex Jones had me chuckling.
The Defense Department is accelerating relief operations and the deployment of additional response capacity to Puerto Rico to meet the Federal Emergency Management Agency's need for a comprehensive commodities distribution network able to reach isolated communities and provide sustained medical support for the island’s residents, Army Lt. Col. Jamie Davis, a Pentagon spokesman, said in a statement this morning.
Army Lt. Gen. Jeffrey S. Buchanan, who’s in command of the DoD response effort in Puerto Rico, is working with FEMA and service components to get distribution priorities right, Davis said.
Buchanan, assisted by his deputy, Army Brig. Gen. Richard C. Kim, assessed that the planned force flow will build the capacity necessary to support Hurricane Maria response priorities, the spokesman said.
Army Lt. Gen. Todd T. Semonite, Chief of Engineers and commanding general of the Army Corps of Engineers, is also in Puerto Rico overseeing the temporary power project, electrical distribution repairs and infrastructure improvements, Davis said.
The Navy amphibious assault ship USS Wasp is now involved in response operations in and around Puerto Rico, the spokesman said.
Davis provided the following updates and details of hurricane relief operations in Puerto Rico and elsewhere in the Caribbean region:
Puerto Rico Situational Update
-- FEMA reports assessments completed at 64 of 69 hospitals; 59 are partially or fully operational; five unassessed facilities are psychiatric hospitals that do not provide emergency care.
-- Forty-five percent of customers have access to drinking water. Ninety-five percent of customers remain without power; power has been restored to San Juan airport and marine terminals.
-- Eight hundred and fifty-one of 1,100 retail gas stations have reopened and purchase limits have been lifted. Forty-nine percent of grocery and big box stores are open.
-- Erosion repairs to the Guajataca Dam are scheduled to begin Oct. 1-2.
-- The Navy hospital ship USNS Comfort departed Norfolk, Virginia, yesterday and it is estimated to arrive in Puerto Rico on Oct. 4.
-- Five of six FEMA-priority sea ports are open or open with restrictions; surveys of Ponce and Roosevelt Roads are ongoing.
U.S. Virgin Islands Situational Update
-- An assessment of the main hospital on St. Thomas will be completed today.
Details of DoD Response in Puerto Rico
-- U.S. Northern Command is deploying enhanced logistics capacity, centered on commodity distribution and medical support, and designed around a sustainment brigade. Northcom is flowing five force packages into Puerto Rico focused on logistics, tilt/rotary wing lift, and medical units. Force Package 1 is on the ground with leadership in Puerto Rico for planning and assessment. Force Packages 2 and 3 will deliver logistical units and associated command and control and is deploying. Force Package 4 will follow and deliver helicopters, aviation command-and-control elements and medical units. Force Package 5 will deploy next and provide more robust medical capacity.
-- The USS Wasp, carrying three MH-60 helicopters, is en route to Puerto Rico and will embark 10 additional aircraft. The Marine Corps has identified eight additional MV-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft and two KC-130 fixed-wing aircraft that will self-deploy to support operations on Puerto Rico.
-- U.S. military helicopters moved 3 HHS Disaster Medical Assistance Teams with 12,500 pounds of equipment to Mayaguez, Arecibo, and Ponce from Roosevelt Roads to support the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ “hub-and-spoke” concept for the delivery of medical care. Seven federal medical stations will be co-located with each of the seven hospitals identified as ‘hub’ hospitals.
-- The Guajataca Dam spillway continues to erode; immediate risk reduction measures are ongoing to stabilize the dam spillway. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reports two to three inches of rain has fallen, and an additional two to four inches each day over the next two days is possible.
-- U.S. Transportation Command will deliver super sandbags for spillway stabilization today; sandbag installation will follow on or about Oct. 1.
Foreign Disaster Assistance
-- U.S. Southern Command’s Joint Task Force Leeward Islands continues evacuations on Dominica. Following the evacuation of priority U.S. citizen medical cases, the Hurricane Response Task Force will transition to on-call status today.
The Justice Department has released a series of recently overruled legal memos concluding that presidents cannot appoint their relatives to the White House staff or presidential commissions, even to unpaid posts.
In January, a career Justice Department official essentially declared the earlier opinions erroneous or obsolete, clearing the way for President Donald Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner to take a senior adviser position in the White House. First daughter Ivanka Trump later took a similar official but unpaid slot under the same legal rationale.
The newly-disclosed opinions, issued to the Nixon, Carter and Reagan White House and obtained by POLITICO Monday through a Freedom of Information Act request, detail how Justice Department lawyers concluded for decades that such appointments of family members were illegal under an anti-nepotism law passed in 1967.
"You have asked for our opinion on the question whether the President could appoint Mrs. Carter to be Chairman of a Commission on Mental Health proposed to be established in a forthcoming Executive Order. It is our opinion that he may not," acting Assistant Attorney General John Harmon wrote in a February 1977 memo to Carter White House Associate Counsel Douglas Huron.
An attached memo from Edwin Kneedler, now the most senior career attorney in the Office of the Solicitor General, concluded that an honorary post for Mrs. Carter would not run afoul of a law passed in 1967 and long perceived as a response to President John F. Kennedy's appointment of his brother Robert Kennedy as Attorney General.
"Although the matter is not wholly free from doubt, I do not believe that [the 1967 legislation] would prohibit Mrs. Carter from holding an essentially honorary position, such as Honorary Chairman, related to the Commission's work," wrote Kneedler.
The following month, Rosalynn Carter, was named to just such an honorary post.
"Although Mrs. Carter is serving as honorary chairperson of the Commission, she will be actively involved in all aspects of the Commission's work," a White House statement said.
At about the same time, Kneedler issued another opinion concluding that one of the Carters' sons could not volunteer to work for a White House staff member. Justice Department lawyers also essentially vetoed a plan to have the Carter son, apparently James Earl "Chip" Carter III, to work out of a West Wing office while doing work for the Democratic National Committee, the newly-disclosed records show.
In 1983, Justice Department lawyers appear to have dissuaded the Reagan White House from naming an unidentified Reagan family member to an advisory panel on private-sector volunteer efforts. "We think the proposal to have a member of the President's family serve actively on the Commission on Private Sector Initiatives raises virtually the same problems raised by Mrs. Carter's proposed service," Deputy Assistant Attorney General Robert Shanks wrote.
The documents released Monday also include the full text of a legal opinion Justice issued in 2009 to the Obama White House, concluding that the law did not permit the appointment of the president's half-sister Maya Soetoro-Ng to a commission on White House fellowships or the appointment of the president's brother-in-law Conrad Robinson to a commission on physical fitness. Soetoro-Ng appears to have quietly left the fellowships panel, which she had joined before the legal memo was finalized. Robinson was never named to the fitness board.
Just which relative or relatives President Richard Nixon wanted to appoint to the White House staff is unclear, but the Justice Department memo sent to the White House on the topic soon after the president's re-election in 1972 said the 1967 law against hiring relatives was "clearly applicable" to lower level White House positions. It said applying the law to more senior posts might raise Constitutional questions.
The opinion longtime Justice Department attorney Daniel Koffsky issued in January at the request of the incoming Trump administration concluded that another law passed in 1978 and conferring broad authority on the president to appoint White House officials essentially overrides the earlier anti-nepotism measure.
"We believe that the President's special hiring authority [in the 1978 law] permits him to make appointments to the White House Office that the anti-nepotism statute might otherwise forbid," Koffsky wrote in the opinion sent to White House Counsel Donald McGahn at his request.
Several ethics experts were critical of the January opinion.
"We think the law is ambiguous and that the safer course would've been to ask Congress to resolve the ambiguity," former White House ethics lawyers Norman Eisen and Richard Painter said in a joint statement at the time.
The existence of most of the legal memos issued to prior White Houses became known after the documents were cited in Koffsky's opinion, which was made public by the Trump administration shortly after it was formally issued on Inauguration Day. However, the text of the earlier opinions was not revealed at that time.
A lawyer for Kushner, Jamie Gorelick, had no immediate comment about the memos when contacted Monday night, but in January she welcomed the Justice Department's reversal.
"We believed that we had the better argument on this," Gorelick said. "The Office of Legal Counsel of the Justice Department – in an opinion by a highly regarded career Deputy Assistant Attorney General – adopted a position consistent with our own."
POLITICO requested the memos delivered to Obama and earlier presidents from the Justice Department last November, about week after Trump's election.
In a letter accompanying Monday's release, OLC attorney Paul Colborn said most of the memos were covered by attorney-client privilege or executive privilege applicable to advice rendered to the president or his aides. Colborn said the Justice Department was releasing the opinions "as a matter of discretion."
However, once Koffsky's opinion citing the earlier memos and their rationale was made public, the legal justification to keep them secret may have been undercut.
Trump In Crisis After His Company Gets Caught Trying To Do Business In Russia During CampaignJared and Ivanka’s secret email addresses are hosted by the Trump Org
Yesterday, Politico reported that Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump had more private email accounts which were set up after the 2016 Presidential election.
Per Politico, Trump’s daughter and son-in-law registered the domain ijkfamily.com to use to handle these email accounts.
According to public domain name records, ijkfamily.com was registered on 31 December 2016, during the height of the Transition and a few weeks before the Presidential inauguration.
When someone buys a .com domain name, they must give their name, address and contact details which are added to a public database. This is called WHOIS data.
The WHOIS data for ijkfamily.com is not accessible. Instead, the entry in the WHOIS register gives the details of Domains by Proxy, a company which exists to hide data from the WHOIS database.
While this might sound sinister, it actually is fairly typical. It costs less than ten dollars to do, and can even be free sometimes. I use similar services for some of the domains I control. I personally don’t read anything into the decision to use a WHOIS proxy.
There is no website for this domain. www.ijkfamily.com is just a holding page run by the domain retailer, Godaddy.com. Again, that’s not surprising if the domain was only bought to be used for email.
So where’s the email server?
Here’s where it gets interesting. Different services on the same domain name can be assigned to different servers. So where is the mailserver handing email for ijkfamily.com?
We can find that out by looking up the Mail Exchanger Record (MX) for the domain:
As you can see above, there are two listed mailservers for ijkfamily.com
These are the subdomains which deal with an email being sent to, say, jared@ijkfamily.com. Now we need to find out what servers those domains are on. We can do this via an NSLookup to find the Internet Protocol (IP) addresses that those names refer to:
- ijkpph01.ijkfamily.com
- ijkpph02.ijkfamily.com
Unsurprisingly, the lookup gave us two sequential IP addresses, 144.121.114.12 and 144.121.114.13 . These addresses probably both go to the same actual server, with two being used for redundancy.
144.121.114.12 and 144.121.114.13 aren’t GoDaddy addresses. Neither of them is running a webserver, so if you paste them into your browser bar then nothing will happen.
Luckily, there are companies who have huge databases of IP addresses and who owns them. One of them, Domaintools, was able to provide the missing piece of the picture.
Yes, 144.121.114.12 and 144.121.114.13 are the addresses for mailhost01.trumporg.com and mailhost02.trumporg.com. These are the mailservers for the Trump Organization. Just to close the loop, I checked this too.
This means that Jared and Ivanka’s private email addresses, set up during the
Transition and used in the White House, were hosted by the Trump Organization.
Obviously this raises a lot more questions about who actually made the domain name and who added the email accounts to the Trump Org’s private mailserver. It raises questions of security and privacy, because Trump Org IT staff would potentially have access to the email accounts. It raises questions of judgement and competence, given how similar this all feels to other, erm, high-profile cases involving private email servers.
I’m sure all those questions will be asked in time.
Journalists who want a better explanation, feel free to contact me.
Documents turned over to Special Counsel Robert Mueller show that Trump’s company was trying to do business in Russia after he had locked up the Republican presidential nomination.
The Washington Post reported:
Associates of President Trump and his company have turned over documents to federal investigators that reveal two previously unreported contacts from Russia during the 2016 campaign, according to people familiar with the matter.
In one case, Trump’s personal attorney and a business associate exchanged emails weeks before the Republican National Convention about the lawyer possibly traveling to an economic conference in Russia that would be attended by top Russian financial and government leaders, including President Vladimir Putin, according to people familiar with the correspondence.
With any other candidate or elected official, this may not be an issue because they would have separated themselves from their business, but Donald Trump has chosen to stay conflict and not put a wall between his business interests and the presidency. Trump has repeatedly stated that he has no business in and nothing to do with Russia.
President Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner and daughter Ivanka Trump re-routed their personal email accounts to computers run by the Trump Organization as public scrutiny intensified over their use of private emails to conduct White House business, internet registration records show.
The move, made just days after Kushner’s use of a personal email account first became public, came shortly after special counsel Robert Mueller asked the White House to turn over records related to his investigation of Russia's interference in the 2016 election and possible collusion with Trump associates. It also more closely intertwines President Trump’s administration with his constellation of private businesses.
Kushner, who is a senior adviser to the president, first faced scrutiny for his private email use on Sept. 24, when his lawyer confirmed that he had occasionally used a personal email account to communicate with other White House officials. Kushner's contacts with Russians during the presidential campaign have drawn the attention of federal investigators.
According to internet registration records reviewed by USA TODAY and cybersecurity researchers, Kushner and his wife Ivanka Trump, who is also a senior adviser, re-routed their email accounts to a server operated by the Trump Organization on either Sept. 26 or 27, as attention from the media and lawmakers intensified.
The Trump Organization did not respond to questions Tuesday about the email accounts.
A spokesman for Kushner and Ivanka Trump, who spoke only on condition of anonymity because they were not directly involved with the technical details, said in a statement that the couple's personal email "does not reside and never has resided in, nor passed through, through the Trump Organization email server." Instead, the spokesman said Kushner and Trump and used a "filtering service" to block viruses and malware.
Last week, the leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee, which is conducting its own investigation of Russian election interference, told Kushner they were “concerned” that they had heard about the emails in news reports instead of from him. The committee had asked him to turn over copies of emails related to the investigation.
The registration records work like street signs – they direct internet traffic to specific computers connected to the network. One set of those records, known as mail exchange records, tells other computers where to send emails addressed to a particular domain.
The internet domain Kushner used for his personal emails was first registered in December. In March, mail exchange records for Kushner and Trump’s family email domain, ijkfamily.com, directed messages to an email system run by Microsoft. The registration was updated at the end of September. Now it points to two mail serversused by the Trump Organization.
USA TODAY reviewed the registration records. Nicholas Weaver, a researcher at the International Computer Science Institute, also reviewed the records and reached the same conclusion. “All indications are these emails are handled by a Trump Organization server,” Weaver said.
The records do not specify whether the emails remain on the Trump Organization server, or simply pass through and are later delivered somewhere else.
Lawyers and cybersecurity researchers said the move was puzzling.
Renato Mariotti, a former federal prosecutor, said that while the emails Kushner and Trump sent and received through their personal accounts could well have been innocuous – locating them on computers run by the Trump Organization “certainly creates the appearance of potential impropriety.”
Mariotti said the move raises questions about who at the Trump-owned company might have access to emails regarding White House business.
The Trump Organization did not respond to questions Tuesday about whether anyone at the company had access to the messages.
Trump, who refused to fully divest from his businesses, resigned from his real estate and branding empire the day before he took office in January. He instead ceded control of the businesses to a revocable trust run for his benefit by two of his sons and a longtime Trump Organization employee. Ivanka Trump and Kushner also separated themselves from their own businesses before taking senior roles in the administration.
Kushner’s lawyer, Abbe Lowell, said in a statement last week that Kushner had taken steps to preserve work-related emails from his personal account by forwarding copies to his White House email account.
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson was on the verge of resigning this past summer amid mounting policy disputes and clashes with the White House, according to multiple senior administration officials who were aware of the situation at the time.
The tensions came to a head around the time President Donald Trump delivered a politicized speech in late July to the Boy Scouts of America, an organization Tillerson once led, the officials said.
Just days earlier, Tillerson had openly disparaged the president, referring to him as a “moron,” after a July 20 meeting at the Pentagon with members of Trump’s national security team and Cabinet officials, according to three officials familiar with the incident.
While it's unclear if he was aware of the incident, Vice President Mike Pence counseled Tillerson, who is fourth in line to the presidency, on ways to ease tensions with Trump, and other top administration officials urged him to remain in the job at least until the end of the year, officials said.
Officials said that the administration, beset then by a series of high-level firings and resignations, would have struggled to manage the fallout from a Cabinet secretary of his stature departing within the first year of Trump’s presidency.
Pence has since spoken to Tillerson about being respectful of the president in meetings and in public, urging that any disagreements be sorted out privately, a White House official said. The official said progress has since been made.
Yet the disputes have not abated. This weekend, tensions spilled out into the open once again when the president seemed to publicly chide Tillerson on his handling of the crisis with North Korea.
NBC News spoke with a dozen current and former senior administration officials for this article, as well as others who are close to the president.
Tillerson, who was in Texas for his son’s wedding in late July when Trump addressed the Boy Scouts, had threatened not to return to Washington, according to three people with direct knowledge of the threats. His discussions with retired Gen. John Kelly, who would soon be named Trump’s second chief of staff, and Defense Secretary James Mattis, helped initially to reassure him, four people with direct knowledge of the exchanges said.
After Tillerson’s return to Washington, Pence arranged a meeting with him, according to three officials. During the meeting, Pence gave Tillerson a “pep talk,” one of these officials said, but also had a message: the secretary needed to figure out how to move forward within Trump’s policy framework.
Kelly and Mattis have been Tillerson’s strongest allies in the cabinet. In late July, “they did beg him to stay,” a senior administration official said. “They just wanted stability.”
At that time, however, State Department spokesperson Heather Nauert responded to speculation that Tillerson was thinking about resigning by saying he was “committed to staying” and was “just taking a little time off” in Texas.
Tillerson's top State Department spokesman, R.C. Hammond, said Tillerson did not consider quitting this past summer. He denied that Tillerson called Trump a “moron.” Hammond said he was unaware of the details of Tillerson’s meetings with Pence.
Hammond said he knew of only one time when the two men discussed topics other than policy: A meeting where Pence asked Tillerson if he thought Nikki Haley, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, was helpful to the administration, or if he was worried about the role she was playing. He added that whenever the vice president gives advice on how processes could run more smoothly, the advice is a good thing.
Hammond also said that he wouldn’t characterize the secretary’s conversations with Mattis or Kelly as attempts to convince Tillerson to stay in his position.
A Pentagon official close to Mattis denied any awareness of a specific conversation about Tillerson’s future in the administration. But the official said the two men speak all the time and have a regular breakfast together.
The White House declined to comment on the record for this story.
Tillerson and Trump clashed over a series of key foreign policy issues over the summer, including Iran and Qatar. Trump chafed at Tillerson’s attempts to push him – privately and publicly – toward decisions that were at odds with his policy positions, according to officials. Hammond said Tillerson has had no policy differences with Trump. “The president’s policy is his policy,” Hammond said.
In August, Trump was furious with Tillerson over his response to a question about the president’s handling of the racially charged and deadly violence in Charlottesville, Virginia, administration officials said. Trump had said publicly that white nationalists and neo-Nazi sympathizers shared blame for violence with those who came out to protest them.
“The president speaks for himself,” Tillerson said at the time, when asked on “Fox News Sunday” about Trump’s comments.
Hammond said Trump addressed the issue with Tillerson in a meeting the next day. He said that during the meeting, Trump congratulated another White House official, Homeland Security Adviser Tom Bossert, for his performance on the Sunday news talk shows. Bossert had defended Trump’s controversial pardon of former Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio.
The president, according to Hammond, told Tillerson he was upset with his comments when he saw them the first time. But, Hammond said Trump told Tillerson, after watching the interview a second and third time, the president understood that Tillerson was trying to say Trump is the best person to convey what his values are.
Still, the message was clear that Trump wanted Tillerson to defend him more, Hammond said.
The frustrations run both ways. Tillerson stunned a handful of senior administration officials when he called the president a “moron” after a tense two-hour long meeting in a secure room at the Pentagon called "The Tank," according to three officials who were present or briefed on the incident. The July 20 meeting came a day after a meeting in the White House Situation Room on Afghanistan policy where Trump rattled his national security advisers by suggesting he might fire the top U.S. commander of the war and comparing the decision-making process on troop levels to the renovation of a high-end New York restaurant, according to participants in the meeting.
It is unclear whether Trump was told of Tillerson’s outburst after the Pentagon meeting or to what extent the president was briefed on Tillerson’s plan to resign earlier in the year.
Tillerson also has complained about being publicly undermined by the president on the administration’s foreign policy agenda, officials said.
Those strains were on display this past weekend when Tillerson said, to the White House’s surprise, that the U.S. is attempting diplomatic talks with North Korea.
Trump quickly took the opposite position, writing on Twitter “I told Rex Tillerson, our wonderful Secretary of State, that he is wasting his time trying to negotiate with Little Rocket Man...,” using his latest epithet for North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.
“...Save your energy Rex, we'll do what has to be done!” Trump added in a second tweet.
Trump Appears to Undermine New U.S.-North Korea Diplomatic Channel 0:56
Asked whether the president still has confidence in Tillerson, White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders said Monday that he does.
Trump has already seen an unusually high level of turnover in his administration, with the departures of his national security adviser, deputy national security adviser, his chief of staff, press secretary, communications director — twice — his chief strategist, the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the acting head of the Justice Department. Last Friday Trump accepted the resignation of Tom Price, the Health and Human Services secretary.
One senior administration official described late July as “a tough period of time” for Tillerson. His frustrations appeared to mount in the preceding weeks. Trump publicly undermined Tillerson in June over a dispute between Qatar and other Persian Gulf states, including Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Tillerson had called on the countries to ease their blockade of Qatar, yet just hours later Trump said the Saudi-led effort was necessary.
Tillerson also pushed Trump to certify in July that Iran was complying with the 2015 nuclear deal.
Tillerson has been at odds with Trump on other issues as well, arguing against sanctions on Venezuela and reportedly suggesting Israel return to the U.S. $75 million in aid. Tillerson also is seeking to use the implementation of arms deals Trump struck with Saudi Arabia and the UAE as leverage to prod the two countries to resolve the dispute with Qatar, according to U.S. and Arab officials.
Administration officials speculate that Tillerson would be succeeded by Haley if Tillerson were to depart.
Tillerson’s tenure has been rocky from the start. He was confirmed by a Republican-led Senate on 56-to-43 vote. That represents the most votes against a secretary of state in Senate history.
Since then, Tillerson, the former chief executive of ExxonMobil, has been slow to fill jobs within his department and appears to have alienated officials in the White House, the Cabinet and Congress.
He has become known for being difficult to reach and tends to take his time returning phone calls, administration and congressional officials said. Congressional Republicans balked at his proposed cuts to the State Department budget.
“It’s hard to get him to return phone calls,” a senior Republican congressional aide said of Tillerson. “It’s hard to get him to answer letters.”
Hammond said Tillerson is quick to return calls and respond to lawmakers.
Tillerson has clashed with the president’s son-in-law and senior adviser Jared Kushner, who has a broad portfolio that includes policies in the Middle East, officials said.
A second White House official downplayed any tensions between Tillerson and Kushner, noting that Kushner’s efforts on an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement are run through the relevant agencies and that a State Department representative went on his most recent trip to the region.
A third White House official disputed the notion that Tillerson has alienated people in the White House, Cabinet and Congress.
Trump’s July 24 speech at the Boy Scouts gathering struck a political tone unusual for the event, with the president talking about his electoral victory and the “cesspool” of Washington. He also joked about firing his Health and Human Services secretary if congressional Republicans didn’t pass a health care bill. The head of the Boy Scouts later apologized for the political tone of the speech.
Tillerson is an Eagle Scout and a former president of the Boy Scouts. He had appeared at the gathering just three days before Trump. Hammond, his spokesman, said Tillerson was not upset with Trump’s speech. He said Tillerson told him that at the end of the day the scouts are going to remember that the president came to speak at their event, and their parents can answer any questions they might have about the message he delivered.
It’s unclear if the latest disagreement between the White House and Tillerson on North Korea spells an end to the late-July reset.
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs under President George W. Bush, said Trump “completely undercut Tillerson” with his tweets.
“This was a direct public, I thought, repudiation of what Tillerson said,” Burns said. “It feeds the perception that Tillerson does not have a trusting relationship with the president, and that’s very harmful.”
President Donald Trump urged Congress Thursday morning to launch an investigation of the news media, wondering online “why so much of our news is just made up.”
“Why Isn't the Senate Intel Committee looking into the Fake News Networks in OUR country to see why so much of our news is just made up-FAKE!” the president wrote on Twitter Thursday morning. He did not single out a specific story or media outlet that he believed to be guilty of inaccurate reporting.
Trump’s “fake news” complaints have been a staple of his political rhetoric, a label he often applied to stories that feature negative reporting about him or his presidency. Most recently, Trump has railed against reports that have characterized his administration’s hurricane recovery efforts in Puerto Rico as inadequate, as well as against an NBC News report that Secretary of State Rex Tillerson called the president a “moron” over the summer and nearly resigned.
Another frequent “fake news” target for Trump has been the multiple ongoing investigations into Russian interference in last year’s presidential election, one of which is being conducted by the Senate Intelligence Committee. The president often refers to those investigations collectively as a “hoax” or a “witch hunt.”
Sens. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) and Mark Warner (D-Va.), the chairman and vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said at a press conference Wednesday that they remain in the investigatory phase of their probe, having already conducted hundreds of hours of interviews with more scheduled for this month. The question of whether or not either Trump's or Democrat Hillary Clinton's campaign colluded with the Russian government remains open, they said, adding that the Kremlin's election meddling efforts are ongoing around the world.
On Tuesday night, President Donald Trump casually told Geraldo Rivera on Fox News that the United States would have to wipe out $75 billion in debt owed by Puerto Rico to bondholders around the world.
Wall Street promptly freaked out, sending Puerto Rican bonds into a tailspin and leading the White House to move swiftly to clean up Trump's seemingly offhand remarks.
On Wednesday, the Trump administration indicated it has no current plans to take the unprecedented, politically dangerous and probably illegal step of wiping out the owners of Puerto Rico's bonds in the wake of Hurricane Maria's devastation. Trump’s own budget chief quickly walked the president’s comments back.
“I wouldn’t take it word for word with that,” OMB Director Mick Mulvaney said on CNN. “We are not going to deal right now with those fundamental difficulties that Puerto Rico had before the storm.”
Added Mulvaney: “Puerto Rico's going to have to figure out how to fix the errors that it’s made for the last generation on its own finances.”
Numerous senior administration officials and a White House spokesman did not respond to requests on Wednesday morning for further comment on Trump’s remarks.
Mulvaney was cleaning up after a remarkable Trump interview that sent Wall Street bond traders and holders of Puerto Rico’s debt scrambling overnight Tuesday. The island’s general obligation bonds dropped from 56 cents on the dollar to just 36 cents early on Wednesday as investors tried to figure out exactly what the White House might actually do.
The chaos on Wall Street came after Trump told Fox of Puerto Rico: “They owe a lot of money to your friends on Wall Street and we're going to have to wipe that out. You can say goodbye to that.”
Seemingly in populist, bash-Wall-Street mode, Trump singled out Goldman Sachs, which has produced many of the administration’s top economic officials, as a big holder of Puerto Rican debt. “I don't know if it's Goldman Sachs, but whoever it is, you can wave goodbye to that.”
Goldman officials said on Wednesday that the bank does hold Puerto Rican debt, but it is mostly in client accounts. Other big bond mutual fund holders of the island’s debt include OppenheimerFunds, Franklin Templeton, BlackRock and T. Rowe Price. This means that a good portion of the debt is held in mutual funds for average investors. The debt is cheap, yields around 8 percent and is exempt from local, state and federal taxes, making it an attractive target for investment funds.
Trump’s comments aside, there is already a process in place for dealing with Puerto Rico’s crushing debt burden.
Congress passed a law last year to grant the commonwealth what essentially amounts to a super-bankruptcy, in an effort to allow Puerto Rico to begin its recovery from that debt, which includes over $50 billion in unfunded pension liabilities to workers in addition to the more than $70 billion owed to bondholders.
The law was subject to attack ads accusing Republicans who drafted it of a “bailout” of the commonwealth, though no money went toward Puerto Rico’s debt.
The president has no direct power over the territory’s debt, though he can fire members of the unpopular federal board that was set up to oversee the island's finances and nominate others.
But that could throw into turmoil the work that’s being done by the board and the commonwealth government toward reforming Puerto Rico’s finances.
The board already took the most drastic action it can on the debt, filing for a judge to essentially enter all of it into the special bankruptcy process that Congress created. The board has also started an investigation into whether any of Puerto Rico’s bond sales violated the law and may be invalid.
In a letter to congressional leadership sent late Tuesday night, the board asked for quick federal action, including the authorization of a short-term, low-interest loan to keep Puerto Rico’s government functioning.
The board urged “the maximum federal assistance to Puerto Rico to help it respond to and to recover from Hurricanes Irma and Maria.”
The letter said: “This federal assistance should come in the form of grants and reimbursements to assist Puerto Rico in responding to the catastrophic damage it has suffered, and pursuant to an emergency liquidity program, low-interest loans to assist Puerto Rico in responding to its cashflow deficiencies.”
“Immediate and bold assistance is urgently needed to minimize loss of life, support critical emergency response efforts, and provide tools to support the island’s recovery.”
Wall Street analysts mostly dismissed Trump’s comments to Fox, suggesting the president mostly wanted to show sympathy for Puerto Rico after days of criticism for his response to the powerful hurricane.
“Our view is that President Trump’s comments regarding bondholders should be taken seriously, but not literally,” Compass Point Research and Trading’s Isaac Boltansky wrote in a note to clients. “These statements were meant to empathize with Puerto Rico and possibly even catalyze negotiations, but they fall far short of a feasible plan.”
Said David Kotok, chief investment officer at Cumberland Advisors: "No idea what [Trump] means. It certainly threw a curve at markets. There is a federal oversight system already in place. The pre-hurricane debt needs restructuring and this is widely known. Trump is an enigma."
Some Democrats embraced Trump's remarks, saying Washington should move to forgive Puerto Rico's debt, underscoring how challenging the comments could be for Trump on the right, where a bailout for the island would be highly unpopular.
"If ever there was a case for a full debt write-off, it's Puerto Rico," former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers wrote on Twitter.
Other Democrats privately compared Trump's remarks to those by former President Barack Obama when he ripped Chrysler stock owners during the 2009 financial crisis. "He sounds a lot like Obama did back then," one former senior Obama administration official said on Wednesday.
"I am not sure Trump isn’t ultimately correct, though," said Jim Paulsen, chief investment officer at the Leuthold Group. "Most likely, some Puerto Rico debt will have to be forgiven or written off."
He added: "This was probably the case before the hurricane, but given the damage, it is most surely the case now. This, of course, would have many implications for current Puerto Rico bonds and their future ability to raise capital."
Yeah I also remember when th Russia thing was #fakeNews - by certain jabronis on this site in this very thread, especially when it came to the PeePee Tape dossier.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions issued government-wide legal guidance Friday that urges sweeping protection for religious freedom and could impact a series of pending policy decisions involving health care, LGBT rights and even disaster relief.
Sessions billed the 25-page memo directed to all federal agencies as a response to an executive order President Donald Trump signed in May, promoting efforts to promote "religious liberty."
That order triggered a major showdown within the administration as religious and social conservatives pressed for treatment that could essentially allow them to ignore anti-discrimination requirements, particularly in the area of sexual orientation, while more moderate forces warned that upending existing protections would trigger an uproar that could derail other administration priorities.
The new Justice Department guidance takes a muscular view of religious freedom rights, but officials said that the document is a neutral description of existing law and not an effort to weigh in on particular policy issues.
"Religious liberty is not merely a right to personal religious beliefs or even to worship in a sacred place," Sessions wrote. "Except in the narrowest of circumstances, no one should be forced to choose between living out his or her faith and complying with the law. Therefore, to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law, religious observance should be reasonably accommodated in all government activity, including employment, contracting and programming."
The legal analysis was unveiled as the Trump administration is considering or pursuing a series of moves that could broaden the rights of the religious, including allowing churches more latitude to enter political campaigns without jeopardizing their tax exemptions and permitting religious institutions to receive more types of disaster relief funds.
The administration also announced Friday that businesses of all sizes with religious or moral objections to providing contraception coverage or other preventative services under Obamacare will be allowed to opt out of that requirement.
Officials have also debated whether to revoke or alter a policy banning federal contractors from discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation. Trump opted against such a move in May, but LGBT rights advocates remain on guard against such a step.
White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders defended the administration's announcements Friday as clearly in line with Supreme Court precedent.
"The president believes that the freedom to practice one's faith is a fundamental right in this country — and I think all of us do — and that's all that today was about. Our federal government should always protect that right, and as long as Donald Trump is president he will," Sanders said. "The Supreme Court's already made clear what their position is, and it supports what this administration has done."
However, the discussions on religious freedom accommodations and the new legal guidance trudge into an area that has proved searing in the past for one particular high-ranking Trump administration official: Vice President Mike Pence.
As governor of Indiana in 2015, Pence signed a religious freedom law that appeared to give businesses broad rights to deny service to gays and lesbians, and perhaps others. An uproar followed, with many business leaders warning that the move could harm the state economically. Within days, he reversed himself and endorsed a revised measure designed to assuage concerns about discrimination.
A Justice Department official who briefed reporters on the new legal guidance insisted that it does not amount to a license to discriminate.
"It doesn't legalize discrimination at all," said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
However, the legal memo suggests that the government's legal authority to forbid racial discrimination may not be as strong as its authority to target other forms of discrimination, such as bias against women or LGBT individuals.
"The government may be able to meet that [legal] standard with respect to race discrimination ... but may not be able to with respect to other forms of discrimination," Sessions' memo says.
Critics said the guidance could result in LGBT individuals, women or others facing discrimination in federal programs.
"Religious freedom is a fundamental American value," said Maggie Garrett of Americans United for Separation of Church and State. "It doesn't mean you can use religion as an excuse to discriminate or harm others. That's exactly what these guidelines set up."
While the Justice Department policy repeatedly discusses the need to treat religious organizations equally with secular ones, Garrett said that discussion essentially ignores the fact that the Constitution's ban on establishment of religion means the government can't pay to build churches or mosques.
"There is the Establishment Clause which is fundamental to religious freedom," she said. "If it's taxpayer money being used to build a church, what's more establishing of religion than that? And what about the rights of other taxpayers not to pay for another person's religion?"
Prominent religious conservatives hailed Sessions' memo and the simultaneous announcement that employers were free to drop Obamacare's contraception requirement.
"President Trump is demonstrating his commitment to undoing the anti-faith policies of the previous administration and restoring true religious freedom," said Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council.
"President Trump and the Department of Justice are putting federal government agencies on notice: You will not only respect the freedom of every American to believe but live according to those beliefs," Perkins added. "As President Trump continues to follow through on his promises on these core issues, he will continue to have the support of social conservatives on his policy initiatives."
The new Justice Department guidance also holds out the possibility that all corporations, not just small or closely held family businesses, may have religious freedom rights that must be accommodated under federal law.
Protection granted by the Religious Freedom Restoration Act "extends not just to individuals, but also to organizations, associations and at least some for-profit corporations," the attorney general's memo says.
Some Democrats said Trump's claim to be interested in a broad approach to religious freedom was bizarre and disingenuous in light of his calls during the presidential campaign for a ban on Muslims entering the U.S.
"A President who calls for all Muslims to be denied entry into our country cannot credibly defend 'religious liberty,' and certainly cannot use it as an excuse to discriminate against women and LGBTQ individuals and other minorities," said Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont. "Our government should not be in the discrimination business – period. It’s shameful."
The guidance is vague on one point important to many law enforcement agencies: the degree to which religious affiliation can be used for profiling or targeting of potential suspects.
Such profiling seemed to be at the root of Trump's call for a Muslim ban, the new Justice Department memo appears to advocate religious freedom protections so robust that they could impact authorities' ability to target a violent religious sect or a particular ideology with religious components.
Former federal terrorism prosecutor Andy McCarthy said the Trump administration's legal positions could complicate or doom efforts to focus on Muslims with extreme views, such as a desire to impose Sharia law.
"If [that] is just another form of Islam, and must be treated as a religion like any other interpretation of Islam (or any other religious creed), then screening and other forms of preemptive surveillance become difficult if not impossible under the constitutional guidelines that the Justice Department seeks to fortify," McCarthy said.
A Justice official said the guidance doesn’t attempt to resolve such questions.
"It makes the point that you cannot discriminatorily enforce federal law but it does not weigh in on how that would apply with respect to a particular situation … with law enforcement," said the official.
Sessions also issued a separate directive Friday that seeks to impose closer scrutiny of the religious freedom impact of rules issued by agencies across the federal government. The memo requires that anytime a proposed federal agency action is sent to the Justice Department by the Office of Management and Budget for review, Justice's Office of Legal Policy and Civil Rights Division will vet the move for any potential adverse impact on religious freedom protections.
President Trump on Thursday nominated Andrew R. Wheeler, a coal lobbyist with links to outspoken deniers of established science on climate change, to help lead the Environmental Protection Agency.
In announcing Mr. Wheeler, a former aide to Senator James M. Inhofe, to be deputy administrator of the agency, the White House tapped an experienced legislative hand reviled by environmental activists but hailed by industry as having the know-how to dismantle Obama-era fossil fuel regulations.
The nomination comes at a critical moment for the E.P.A. as the agency prepares to repeal a sweeping climate change regulation known as the Clean Power Plan. It would also fill a key high-level position at the agency, where many top offices remain vacant. If confirmed by the Senate, Mr. Wheeler would become the most powerful person at the agency behind its administrator, Scott Pruitt.
“It’s a solid choice,” said Thomas J. Pyle, president of the Institute for Energy Research, a group that promotes fossil fuels and opposes most climate change policy. “Andrew is highly qualified, can work with Congress and understands what needs to be done to articulate President Trump and Administrator Pruitt’s vision of resetting our energy and environmental policies.”
Since 2009, Mr. Wheeler has been a leader in the energy practice of the law firm Faegre Baker Daniels. His clients at the firm have included Murray Energy, one of the nation’s largest coal mining companies. Before joining the firm, he worked on Capitol Hill for more than a decade, much of that time serving under Senator Inhofe as the Oklahoma Republican’s chief counsel and as the staff director for the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“He has spent his entire career working to improve environmental outcomes for Americans across the country and understands the importance of providing regulatory certainty for our country,” Mr. Pruitt said in a statement.
Senator Inhofe is perhaps best known for having brought a snowball to the Senate floor to assail the “hysteria on global warming.” Yet those who work with Mr. Wheeler say he is reliably conservative but not a firebrand in the mold of his former boss. He has opposed the Obama administration’s efforts to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants; criticized an agreement Mr. Obama made with China to jointly cut carbon pollution as “unilateral disarmament with China”; and heralded Murray Energy’s opposition to the Paris agreement on climate change, which Mr. Trump has vowed to abandon.
“There is no one more qualified than Andrew to help Scott Pruitt restore E.P.A. to its proper size and scope,” Senator Inhofe said in a statement. He added that he hoped to see Mr. Wheeler confirmed quickly.
That may not be in the cards. Democrats have already raised concerns about how the administration is filling out the E.P.A., and in a hearing this week clashed with nominees over issues like climate change and pesticides. Moreover, tax reform remains at the top of the Senate calendar.
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, a Democrat from Rhode Island who has made climate change one of his signature issues, said in a statement that Mr. Wheeler’s work for Murray Energy should disqualify him from the position.
“In Andrew Wheeler, the President has tapped yet another fossil fuel industry lobbyist to help in the capture of the Environmental Protection Agency for big polluters,” he said. “He shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near the office to which he’s been nominated, but here we are.”