Society The Donald J. Trump Show - 4 more years editions
- Thread starter IschKabibble
- Start date
Daily Caller - Media Bias/Fact Check
RIGHT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.
- Overall, we rate the Daily Caller strongly right biased based on story selection that almost always favors the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous failed fact checks. The Daily Caller is a source that needs to be fact checked on a per article basis.
I always like when people think they're getting a bonus check.
3 modelers predict Trump reelection: report
3 modelers predict Trump reelection: report
Three modelers are predicting President Trumpwill win reelection in 2020 based on a combination of economic data and incumbent advantages, according to a column in The New York Times.
Steven Rattner wrote that Ray Fair of Yale favors Trump to win based on a model that combines incumbency and gross domestic product growth rates.
The model predicted Barack Obama’s 2008 popular vote margin within a fraction of a percentage point and got within two-tenths of a point for his 2012 vote share, Rattner, who served as a counselor to the Treasury secretary during the Obama administration, added.
The model correctly predicting an electoral victory for Trump in 2016, but overestimated his popular vote share by about 5.5 points, which Rattner attributed to Trump’s personal unfavorables.
“In other words, a more ‘normal’ Republican would likely have won the popular vote by a substantial margin (instead of losing it by three million votes),” Rattner wrote.
Trump’s status as the incumbent also puts the odds in his favor for 2020, according to the Obama-era official.
Mark Zandi, Moody’s Analytics’s chief economist, has also said Trump is poised to win based on an analysis of 12 models, while Donald Luskin of Trend Macrolytics made a similar prediction based on an Electoral College analysis, Rattner noted.
“So the question for 2020 may well be whether Mr. Trump can overcome the majority of voters’ poor perception of him and use a good economy and incumbency to win re-election,” he writes.
3 modelers predict Trump reelection: report
Three modelers are predicting President Trumpwill win reelection in 2020 based on a combination of economic data and incumbent advantages, according to a column in The New York Times.
Steven Rattner wrote that Ray Fair of Yale favors Trump to win based on a model that combines incumbency and gross domestic product growth rates.
The model predicted Barack Obama’s 2008 popular vote margin within a fraction of a percentage point and got within two-tenths of a point for his 2012 vote share, Rattner, who served as a counselor to the Treasury secretary during the Obama administration, added.
The model correctly predicting an electoral victory for Trump in 2016, but overestimated his popular vote share by about 5.5 points, which Rattner attributed to Trump’s personal unfavorables.
“In other words, a more ‘normal’ Republican would likely have won the popular vote by a substantial margin (instead of losing it by three million votes),” Rattner wrote.
Trump’s status as the incumbent also puts the odds in his favor for 2020, according to the Obama-era official.
Mark Zandi, Moody’s Analytics’s chief economist, has also said Trump is poised to win based on an analysis of 12 models, while Donald Luskin of Trend Macrolytics made a similar prediction based on an Electoral College analysis, Rattner noted.
“So the question for 2020 may well be whether Mr. Trump can overcome the majority of voters’ poor perception of him and use a good economy and incumbency to win re-election,” he writes.
Yet still less bias than the source you posted above. Thanks for validating the bias chart.
Are you actually that delusional?
LoL @ any fact/bias check website being honest about liberal bias. You have to add points/percentages for their margin of error whenever it's a liberal source...
Trump is going to jail, the moment he is no longer president:
View: https://www.facebook.com/aljazeera/videos/824678527916227/
Special counsel Robert Mueller said that if his office "had confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so."
View: https://www.facebook.com/aljazeera/videos/824678527916227/
Special counsel Robert Mueller said that if his office "had confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so."
Last edited:
I wish our President was above all this shit. Even if you agree with policies, it is hard to like a 70 something year old man acting like a teenager on twitter.
Totally agree. It's the one thing that annoys me about him. He does like to troll but I agree the office should be above that.
he pretty much said everything we already knew. another nothing burger from mueller
There's this thing called "reasonable doubt"...
- He could not fully investigate conspiracy because of insufficient evidence, due to obstruction.
- He could not charge the President with obstruction, due to DoJ guidelines.
- He cannot make accusatory statements without the possibility of a court proceeding to dispute the accusation.
- He could not exonerate the President of obstruction, given the evidence.