General Thoughts on Georgia shooting?
- Thread starter Thuglife13
- Start date
T
The Big Guy
Guest
Apparently it was legal if multiple DAs had no intrest in criminal charges. Your not a district attorney, your a crying liberal on a mma forum.
Know your place.
I'm awaiting your "but the DA wuz rassis" without a fucking shred of proof
But I read an article that maybe a min or 2 before that happened someone saw someone matching his description leaving a house that was being built. And if citizens arrests are legal, whether you and I like it or not, because I don't, then maybe they were in the right. I'm very curious to know exactly how they got involved in it and if they actually saw him running from the house.
You're spelling "you're" wrong. I'm going to citizen's arrest you and turn you in to the grammar police.
T
The Big Guy
Guest
@conor mcgregor nut hugger , whats up with this? Don't they teach you people the proper "ur" in Florida public schooles?
T
The Big Guy
Guest
@conor mcgregor nut hugger, are these allegations true? Are you a carpetbagger?
M
member 3289
Guest
you mean the DAs that recused themselves because of prior relationships with the accused?
couple years ago they ruled that a person who chased down a guy he thought he recognized as a burglar and beat him with a bat wasn't using legally-justified force for a Citizens Arrest.
M
member 3289
Guest
I'd ask @Bones Nose to post the same proof but he already told me his mom sold his birth certificate for a $10 rock and a bottle of orange Gatorade.
T
The Big Guy
Guest
No I'm talking about the ones it was transferred too. They did it the right way and had another DA go over the case to make sure that there was no conflict of intrest. That's a district attorney with no prior relationship with the two men. Still the same result. Clean shoot.
That's why I said that keyword of "multiple DAs"
Yea but do you have a source for that?
I'd ask @Bones Nose to post the same proof but he already told me his mom sold his birth certificate for a $10 rock and a bottle of orange Gatorade.
T
The Big Guy
Guest
It doesn't matter if he does. No two cases are the same
The case were discussing involves a suspected criminal trying to take the gun from an armed citizen making a citizens arrest. If he were to take that gun he would put the lives of everyone around him in jeopardy. It was lawful to shoot him to prevent him from taking the deadly weapon while fleeing from a crime he just committed
It's not a great look for anyone but the right people survived a dangerous encounter.
I agree no 2 cases are the same, but surely it does help set a legal precedence.
no, not finding it in the caselaw search.
but I did find where a convenience store clerk shot a guy breaking in to the storage building, and claimed it was a citizens arrest. but that was a big Nope from the State Supreme Court
T
The Big Guy
Guest
If he hit him with a bat to lay him down that's illegal. If the burglar tried to attack him that's a huge difference and he would be allowed to defend himself with the bat. At least under fl law
T
The Big Guy
Guest
Thats the opening scene to the movie felon. Your probably just confused again. He chases a cholo and whacks him with a bat.
"A loving husband and father finds his life transformed into a waking nightmare when he accidentally kills a burglar. Sentenced to spend three years in a maximum security prison.."
what matters is what was known to the killers when they attempted to enact a citizens arrest. That will determine if the citizens arrest was lawful, and if it wasn't, your heroes go to jail.
the other thing that matters is if the use of force was justified by the circumstances. That's a little fuzzier, but the video is more than "not a good look". They rolled up on a guy point firearms at him, it won't matter if the firearm was illegal, because they're attempt to stop him had nothing to do with them suspecting him of being a felon in possession...but none of that matters if the citizens arrest wasn't lawful.
who initiated lethal force in the case we're discussing?