UFC 264 Poirier vs mcgregor- Live Discussion - July 10th

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up
Added to Calendar: 07-10-21

BrunoMcGyver

Bruno no dey carry last
Dec 30, 2015
6,497
10,284
Its funny those who say Conor was just "getting started" after getting gangraped in the 1st.

Yeh, because every Conor McGregor fight we've seen that goes longer than 2-3 rounds he gets better as it goes on.

Exactly like what happened in both Nate Diaz fights, the Khabib fight and the Mayweather match.
 

wiz

Posting Machine
Jan 31, 2016
3,906
4,195
Because 10 seconds of taking undefended punches, particularly when the beginning of the sequence appeared to be Conor getting rocked and knocked down, should result in a stoppage. The idea that the outcome of the fight wasn't "definitive" is ridiculous.
It's not definitive because Porier had nothing to do with the leg break. Porier didn't stop Conor. Conor had a freak injury.
 

wiz

Posting Machine
Jan 31, 2016
3,906
4,195
Its funny those who say Conor was just "getting started" after getting gangraped in the 1st.

Yeh, because every Conor McGregor fight we've seen that goes longer than 2-3 rounds he gets better as it goes on.

Exactly like what happened in both Nate Diaz fights, the Khabib fight and the Mayweather match.
It didn't go into the second round though. Conor is still dangerous in the second round.

Conor was obviously behind and losing, but let's not act like the fight was over before the leg break. It wasn't.
 

John Lee Pettimore

Further south than you
May 18, 2021
6,302
6,718
It didn't go into the second round though. Conor is still dangerous in the second round.

Conor was obviously behind and losing, but let's not act like the fight was over before the leg break. It wasn't.
Mate, Poirier is just better.

??
 

BrunoMcGyver

Bruno no dey carry last
Dec 30, 2015
6,497
10,284
It didn't go into the second round though. Conor is still dangerous in the second round.

Conor was obviously behind and losing, but let's not act like the fight was over before the leg break. It wasn't.
He would’ve been about as dangerous as my dick after 7 shots of whiskey.











That means not dangerous at all.
 

BeardOfKnowledge

The Most Consistent Motherfucker You Know
Jul 22, 2015
60,704
56,214
It's not definitive because Porier had nothing to do with the leg break. Porier didn't stop Conor. Conor had a freak injury.
Its definitive because the fight wasn't in any way close. Conor has nothing for Dustin. The leg break saved him the embarrassment of another second round KO.
 

Big Dummy

Cream of the Crop
Dec 15, 2018
8,319
12,753
It's not definitive because Porier had nothing to do with the leg break. Porier didn't stop Conor. Conor had a freak injury.
My legally bought PPV cut out a minute into the fight and came back with a mini and a half left. I feel I’ve been cheated, so I’d like to see it again, but I wouldn’t be mad if they don’t have number 4. Obviously Porier should and will be fighting for the title next.
 

wiz

Posting Machine
Jan 31, 2016
3,906
4,195
Its definitive because the fight wasn't in any way close. Conor has nothing for Dustin. The leg break saved him the embarrassment of another second round KO.
Conor hit Dustin with body shots, leg kicks and left straights. Dustin's GNP was from full guard and a lot of his shots did not land cleanly, and also got hit with some elbows himself. He was also using a lot of energy which could have worked against him later.

As soon as they got back up, Conor was throwing big shots trying to KO Dustin. lol that means Conor was never hurt from that over exaggerated GNP.

The first round didn't justify the ending being "definitive". Conor was never close to getting finished before the leg break.