I feel like you're making a solid argument to keep felons in jail until they kill themselves or die.
what about when they're driving?
but are you really making the "only guns are lethal" argument that the gun-banners make?
seems out of character.
if someone is so unpredictably violent that access to a specific form of lethal force must be prohibited, then Yes.
I also think there should be a lot fewer felonies.
Agree
Disagree
Do you think it's random my silencers were approved Jan 7th? Had to grease those wheels somehow.
right, can't let acknowledge knowledge get in the way of I Believe
Maybe those people shouldn't be committing so many felonies.
Would you give guns to 5-year olds?
you commit an average of 3 federal crimes a day.
that's the TLDR; of the book. but you probably got that from the title.
or maybe not.
And I bet she's not a felon.
Lucky she didn't shoot anyone. Or did she?
if you don't do some felonious shit when you're a juvenile, you wasted the prime years of criminal fun.
but don't get caught.
Yea, but what felonies am I committing now, as a non juvenile, everyday?
read the book. maybe the lights you put on the jetbote didn't have proper import stickers and now you're guilty of illegal interstate commerce. It's just a question of somebody deciding they want you bad enough.
They are made in Murica. Next question.
I know. I was making an example.
same question. have a little intellectual integrity.
Doesn't really matter.
I thought the obvious easiest answer to his question about who would be safe enough to be in society but too dangerous to run around with guns is small children.
And if there are clear exceptions there may be others, so his base argument doesn't stand.
The premise obviously was free access.
Otherwise I agree.