great post!sparkuri;n23296 said:It's a dog and pony show.
They want commisions to solely take responsibility. They will not commit to the UFC individually taking excess disciplinary action.
There is no "if and when", only when.
Instead of simply "advocating" to global commissions, step outside and take them out of contract, they are released, done.
Same argument it's always been.
You steal, say goodbye to your hand.
You kill, you hang.
Get caught in our organization, you're fired.
And same hand picked media.
It's like watching a WH press conference.
Clapping after a press conference on steroid use?
"We identified a problem"
No you didn't. Wasn't Barnett the first champion to be tested, and failed, 13 years ago?
No one asks the one question: "Will you implement an organizational lifetime ban for steroid users?"
If that question isn't asked.....
[video=youtube;qJ1PmuMssdA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJ1PmuMssdA[/video]
They said they are funding an independent third party to do the testing and are in talks with various organizations at the moment.Nodig;n23319 said:Zuffa being their own commission sets off all kind of red flags for me, it's like a football team testing their own players, what happens if their best biggest investment fails, would they release the results?
Also does this mean the proper commissions won't get funded now for the OOC tests they having been catching cheats with? I cannot see why they would get funded once Zuffa have their system in place.
Yes, but Zuffa are in the driving seat regarding the rules, results etc.Zeph;n23332 said:They said they are funding an independent third party to do the testing and are in talks with various organizations at the moment.
They said it was by WADA rules. I don't get it, are you unhappy they are paying for it?Nodig;n23335 said:Yes, but Zuffa are in the driving seat regarding the rules, results etc.
There may be debate on p4p rankings or who is the all time Goat fighter, but there is zero, nada, none, no debate whatsoever, on what company or organization is the undefeated, reigning, defending, undisputed, GOAT of calling a press conference for announcing nothing.lookoutawhale;n23334 said:So I just heard the press conference and I'm not really sure why they had a press conference on this. They are going to test for PED's in the future. ok. Shouldn't this be more of a media release kind of deal? Write a few paragraphs and let people know.
I mean they said they still hadnt chosen a testing company yet but they just wanted to have a press conference out to let people know they are serious about this. Didn't really seem press conference worth to me. They should have chosen a company first and then go from there to let people know the specifics of it.
What's everyone else's thoughts on this. Did you feel it was press conference worthy?
lookoutawhale;n23334 said:So I just heard the press conference and I'm not really sure why they had a press conference on this. They are going to test for PED's in the future. ok. Shouldn't this be more of a media release kind of deal? Write a few paragraphs and let people know.
I mean they said they still hadnt chosen a testing company yet but they just wanted to have a press conference out to let people know they are serious about this. Didn't really seem press conference worth to me. They should have chosen a company first and then go from there to let people know the specifics of it.
What's everyone else's thoughts on this. Did you feel it was press conference worthy?
They don't seem like they're ever fully prepared to hold press conferences. Ex: The Time Is Now. And when they do, it's for something that could have been covered in a press release, like you said. Maybe they think being in front of cameras make them appear more serious.lookoutawhale;23334 said:So I just heard the press conference and I'm not really sure why they had a press conference on this. They are going to test for PED's in the future. ok. Shouldn't this be more of a media release kind of deal? Write a few paragraphs and let people know.
I mean they said they still hadnt chosen a testing company yet but they just wanted to have a press conference out to let people know they are serious about this. Didn't really seem press conference worth to me. They should have chosen a company first and then go from there to let people know the specifics of it.
What's everyone else's thoughts on this. Did you feel it was press conference worthy?
lookoutawhale;n23334 said:So I just heard the press conference and I'm not really sure why they had a press conference on this. They are going to test for PED's in the future. ok. Shouldn't this be more of a media release kind of deal? Write a few paragraphs and let people know.
I mean they said they still hadnt chosen a testing company yet but they just wanted to have a press conference out to let people know they are serious about this. Didn't really seem press conference worth to me. They should have chosen a company first and then go from there to let people know the specifics of it.
What's everyone else's thoughts on this. Did you feel it was press conference worthy?
They are going to be the commission of their own testing, just because they are paying for the testing and will be contracted to a lab does change the fact that they are in control of the testing and results, releases etc.Zeph;n23342 said:They said it was by WADA rules. I don't get it, are you unhappy they are paying for it?
If it is by a independent third party, who follow WADA rules, then surely it comes down to who the independent third party is and not ZUFFA?Nodig;n23353 said:They are going to be the commission of their own testing, just because they are paying for the testing and will be contracted to a lab does change the fact that they are in control of the testing and results, releases etc.
I'm glad the extra testing is getting done though, but would rather it was done through the commissions with Zuffa still funding it, it's been working. If it's not broke.........
i'd say the testing agency has to hand the results to the commissions so they can be cleared to fight.Nodig;n23353 said:They are going to be the commission of their own testing, just because they are paying for the testing and will be contracted to a lab does change the fact that they are in control of the testing and results, releases etc.
I'm glad the extra testing is getting done though, but would rather it was done through the commissions with Zuffa still funding it, it's been working. If it's not broke.........
Would like to know this too.Thatonedude;n23302 said:what did Helwani ask, I had to step away
The tests will be administered by an org like USADA, that org will choose who to test and when to test (or the commission may order that?), Results will be sent to the ruling Commissions and Zuffa won't know until notified. How could Zuffa protect a fighter then? Did you watch the presser?dacofty;n23542 said:No it will not be good, I see the UFC testing guys and those who the want to be kept under the radar they will pull due to injury. Do I trust the UFC....HELL NO