Order placed
You'll ignore me? You promise!!????You didnt and cant hurt me. I will actually put you on ignore because you bore me. At least some others bring insight and an intellectual counterpoint to the discussion. You’re a sad little troll. Im just pointing out what a you are and why you cant figure out why you were pinked. It is split right down party lines but accoring to you the other side is the only ones wrong.
Do you know how many people here promise to put me on ignore and yet keep following me around?
I bet you won't... but hope you do.
Oooh. Guess I hit a nerve.
If there's someone "acting an idiot" here, perhaps just maybe, its you.
I'm not being partisan. I'm showing how partisan you and everyone who complains about it is being.
Congrats on revealing your partisanship.
If you were smart enough to simply ask me what I meant.......
I would have explained to you that I believe Kelly Anne Conway, and I believe Dr. Ford. Simple. But hard for you to grasp I guess.
But you and the 'conservatards' seemed to fixate only on what I said about Conway, which again in case you didn't (obviously) get it the 3 times I said it - shows your partisanship. aka The problem with acting like a know-it-all on the internet...
With all due respek.
Last edited:
Keep going with that train of thought...
I feel like you were on the cusp of a very huge breakthrough in self-revelation.
I feel like people are also missing a really obvious meme with a crying therapist after years of bottling.
This is interesting...
Text messages suggest Kavanaugh wanted to refute accuser's claim before it became public
Text messages suggest Kavanaugh wanted to refute accuser's claim before it became public
More fuel for the perjury claims.
The FBI is investigating the Ramirez claims, yeah?
Is there seriously not a better option than this guy? If there is any questions about him, he should not be given a lifetime job as the top judge in the land.
I don't give a shit what political party he belongs to.
I don't give a shit what political party he belongs to.
No one should ever be given that position.
I asked that same question earlier, and nothing but partisan silence. lol.
D
Deleted member 1
Guest
No I'm trying to give a chance before putting you back on probation and then banning you. That's easier for me. That's always easier.Instead youve doubled down on your bias that you can't see me constantly trying to give you chances and bring you back into the fold instead of just being a jerk to everybody.
You haven't read my posts in this very thread I see. You don't describe my post or my opinions at all accurately here.
You're the one that made rape statements on your status bar which I have to consider how it looks on the site when people show up. What's that got to do with this thread? Nothing. Jusf somebody baiting.
Again. You think I care what your political opinion is. Or that it's the point here. I don't, because you don't care enough to post it. You're just looking to make a point and be rude to people until you get a reaction. Then you report them for it.
There are plenty of people that agree with the position you posted that are posting in this thread continually without the fighting and toxicity you're bringing intentionally.
Again you're so blind by your bias you apparently have not read my posts in this thread.
If your next Post in this thread is anything but respectful discourse about the actual topic of the thread I'm putting on you probation. It's not up for discussion. I'm not going to have the thread derailed continually for your personal quest.
Typical partisan response! You Republicans have no shame!
He's fucked. Not necessarily because of the accusations, but more because of his dishonesty when describing his younger days. I don't think anyone cares that he was shotgunning beers and chasing skirts in his college days - we all did that. But don't try to sell me on a different truth. Own it.
It looks like Kav is an Eddie Haskell. We don't need an Eddie Haskell in the Supreme Court.
I'm on the "pick someone else" side of the fence.
D
Deleted member 1
Guest
Makes him seem untrustworthy, unlikeable, and this isn't a court room. It's a job interview. Next applicant please.
92%+ of sexual assault accusers are telling the truth by the FBI data. So I always start from that preponderance. Not absolute, but I start with believing Ford and work back from there. From the fact that I think something probably happened, I then get Kav totally downplaying his drunken frat boy days and some other PR white lies under oath, makes me consider that he very well might have been black out drunk and got gropey with Mrs. Ford. Maybe that doesn't stand up in a court of law, but it's kav that undermined his own ability to tell me he was drunk or not by obviously hiding this particular aspect behind the facade.
If you aren't squeaky clean, own what you are and show me how its not a liability, instead of making it a liability.
D
Deleted member 1
Guest
Spend 28 pages calling him "Kinky Kav" and a liar.
Get accused of supporting him blindly...
I don’t trust squeaky clean people.
Makes him seem untrustworthy, unlikeable, and this isn't a court room. It's a job interview. Next applicant please.
92%+ of sexual assault accusers are telling the truth by the FBI data. So I always start from that preponderance. Not absolute, but I start with believing Ford and work back from there. From the fact that I think something probably happened, I then get Kav totally downplaying his drunken frat boy days and some other PR white lies under oath, makes me consider that he very well might have been black out drunk and got gropey with Mrs. Ford. Maybe that doesn't stand up in a court of law, but it's kav that undermined his own ability to tell me he was drunk or not by obviously hiding this particular aspect behind the facade.
If you aren't squeaky clean, own what you are and show me how its not a liability, instead of making it a liability.
Neither do most people. I was with him until his testimony. I would vote 'no' even though I feel like Ford's story is wonky.
And her wonky story may not be intentional. It's common for people with PTSD to change their story or add details over time. They can even hear someone else's story and absorb their details if it makes sense. And they may not even realize they are dong it. They remember the trauma in fragments, so the brain consistently reworks it to make sense. I think something happened at that party. But after this much time who knows what the original remembered fragments were.
Either way, I don't think Kav is the right guy. His demeanor is awful.