It is gonna to be interesting to see how he handles his eventual losses. Everyone loses if they fight long enough. Anyone who follows sports knows that losing is inevitable.
It is gonna to be interesting to see how he handles his eventual losses. Everyone loses if they fight long enough. Anyone who follows sports knows that losing is inevitable.
At the same time, is it not the right thing to do?Even if the rule changed, retroactively applying it to decisions would set a horrible precedent for refs. The Hammil loss is the only thing keeping Jones at least a little humble since nothing else is.
You purposely cut my quote just to make it sound like it's something you disagree with, why? You clearly read how I said "Not even counting the shit he did", but made it seem as if my decision was based on the things Jon Jones did.Completely irrelevant, goof
Are you saying that drinking and driving laws are stupid?I have a friend who got a dui 15 years ago. Yes, he broke the law by drinking and driving. However, he was in his neighborhood and only going 15 miles per hour. Stupid law. They should wipe it from his record and reimburse his fines. Hell, they should probably have to pay him for the 2 weeks he spent in jail.
Imagine of they went back to the early days and called every fight a NC that had low blows, fish hooking, fence grabbing...overturn (change) the rule first, then we can talk about Jon Jones. But if they ever do that, they better over turn any other fights that ended in a same way including someone losing a fight due to losing a point by throwing those illegal elbows.
You purposely cut my quote just to make it sound like it's something you disagree with, why? You clearly read how I said "Not even counting the shit he did", but made it seem as if my decision was based on the things Jon Jones did.
Yeah exactly. So they shouldn’t overturn Jones or anyone elseImagine of they went back to the early days and called every fight a NC that had low blows, fish hooking, fence grabbing...
I was mostly joking. However, there could be a difference in severity from someone driving 90 on the hiway vs someone doing 10 a block from their house.Are you saying that drinking and driving laws are stupid?
...
In an effort to start an argument I'll tag @ConorMcGregorsBeard here.I was mostly joking. However, there could be a difference in severity from someone driving 90 on the hiway vs someone doing 10 a block from their house.
Imagine of they went back to the early days and called every fight a NC that had low blows, fish hooking, fence grabbing...
If you don’t know him by now. You’ll never, never, know him.You purposely cut my quote just to make it sound like it's something you disagree with, why? You clearly read how I said "Not even counting the shit he did", but made it seem as if my decision was based on the things Jon Jones did.
He's making a valid point. The point of the drinking and driving laws are to keep people from being hurt/killed as a result of drunk drivers.In an effort to start an argument I'll tag @ConorMcGregorsBeard here.
Don't start the engine if not soberI have a friend who got a dui 15 years ago. Yes, he broke the law by drinking and driving. However, he was in his neighborhood and only going 15 miles per hour. Stupid law. They should wipe it from his record and reimburse his fines. Hell, they should probably have to pay him for the 2 weeks he spent in jail.
EeeeeYou purposely cut my quote just to make it sound like it's something you disagree with, why? You clearly read how I said "Not even counting the shit he did", but made it seem as if my decision was based on the things Jon Jones did.
Don't start the engine if not sober
If so close to home just walk
Just my take