I've never seen it, but it could. Bullets often measure smaller diameter than they're listed as. If memory serves bullets also shed size while they travel down their barrel.6.5mm round can't make an 6mm enter wound
I've never seen it, but it could. Bullets often measure smaller diameter than they're listed as. If memory serves bullets also shed size while they travel down their barrel.6.5mm round can't make an 6mm enter wound
also seems like these riots meaasure the flesh compared to JFK's hard ass skull, when the object is harder, I would think it would maintain the original sizeIn regards to?
Sure, that range for the M16 is 550 yards or so. Obviously the closer you are the more energy the bullet has because, because speed kills.i guess JFK shot won't matter because might be around the same distance as the riots
but doesn't bullet reach a certain distance where it could maximize kinetic energy? I'm sure that will alter the shape. not a physics guru though so I could be wrong
So 6 mm would be larger than the bullets actual size.also seems like these riots meaasure the flesh compared to JFK's hard ass skull, when the object is harder, I would think it would maintain the original size
i think the distance and where it impact matters (like what type of material the target is)I've never seen it, but it could. Bullets often measure smaller diameter than they're listed as. If memory serves bullets also shed size while they travel down their barrel.
I think most kinetic energy is where most consistent trajectory will be.Sure, that range for the M16 is 550 yards or so. Obviously the closer you are the more energy the bullet has because, because speed kills.
yea I'm just butchering everything right now, about to go to bed actuallySo 6 mm would be larger than the bullets actual size.
he never made it to him and his classmates.did he take video?
I saw a documentary on that theory, and it was entirely plausible.There's a video on youtube where they address this sustaining that this guy heard Oswald's shots, got up with his AR-15 and accidentally shot JFK which is consistent with the lone shooter theory and leaves the CIA off the hook. Bullshit.
completely different context though. There was one good video of JFK getting shot and (according to what I've read so far) the CIA was able to withhold that video for years due to their close contact with media tycoon Henry Luce who bought the video from Jacob Zapruder and never released it until the mid 70's. There is a source in a video where someone says that even then the Zapruder film was manipulated the weekend of the assassination. in the context of the 1960's, that's it, video proof is gone forever. With 9/11 cell phones were not that big yet but still, you get it, it's a different context regarding information flow. much harder to control evidence.Wait til you look into 9/11 in another 40 years
it is technically plausible but also extremely convenient to established powers. "someone fucked up, that's it, let's go on"... it also doesn't address the "back and to the left" motion iirc.I saw a documentary on that theory, and it was entirely plausible.
Read between the lines, don't take things so literally. I'm asking for verification of conspiracy theories that I just learnt about from reading two books. it sounds like I discovered the holy grail, like flat earthers think they do. I'm confident most people understand the reference right away.what does JFK getting conspired on have to do with flat earth lol
OP doesnt believe in vaccines nowwhat does JFK getting conspired on have to do with flat earth lol
NORead between the lines, don't take things so literally. I'm asking for verification of conspiracy theories that I just learnt about from reading two books. it sounds like I discovered the holy grail, like flat earthers think they do. I'm confident most people understand the reference right away.
you one of the gun guys? I only marked out a couple gun guys, you weren’t one of them. Why bring it up?NO
U read between the lines budda
I was making joke, I don't take any of the internet seriously
don't be mad about the gun discussion and hold that against meeeeee, I still luv u
and yes JFK was whacked, and it wasn't a lone gunman
It was one of a few major coups on american liberties
I value the 2nd amendment, that is importantyou one of the gun guys? I only marked out a couple gun guys, you weren’t one of them. Why bring it up?
You think it was the cia? Do you agree with the military-industrial complex narrative? Have you ever seen the video where the driver turns backwards with a big long gun and shoots over his shoulder? I want someone to tell me that is a homemade montage.
I suppose you could look at it like that, or you could say that it's extremely inconvenient to those who want to believe in some sort of darker conspiracyit is technically plausible but also extremely convenient to established powers. "someone fucked up, that's it, let's go on"... it also doesn't address the "back and to the left" motion iirc.
if that was the case when why was bush Sr caught lying about his location on the day of the "accident"?I suppose you could look at it like that, or you could say that it's extremely inconvenient to those who want to believe in some sort of darker conspiracy
hahaWait til you look into 9/11 in another 40 years
I wish I could get on board with thatI'll add to my last post, to state Hanlon's razor:
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."
Seems quite fitting in this case.
this quote is awesome but in this case it's just not one person being stupid - it's an endless string of inconsistencies in the official story and evidence pointing towards a totally different scenario. Several people who could've provided info "committed suicide"; The presidential commission that investigated the assassination did the sloppiest job ever; The police department that would've investigated the crime didn't do it; the supposed lone killer had a long history with the CIA, etc. etc.I'll add to my last post, to state Hanlon's razor:
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."
Seems quite fitting in this case.