Spot on like usual Rambo...
All the CEO's jumping ship prolly knew of the coming storm - cashed out - and fled for the hills.
P.S: Rambo please send my kind regards to alexm41 with this sincere
Nickdiazfuckyou.gif
Society Coronavirus theories, implications & whatnot
- Thread starter sparkuri
- Start date
All the CEO's jumping ship prolly knew of the coming storm - cashed out - and fled for the hills.
P.S: Rambo please send my kind regards to alexm41 with this sincere
Nickdiazfuckyou.gif
Interesting talk, but 2 red flags pop up automatically.
1. Reading a script off his computer screen.
2. Why is he at home still in his scrubs?
1. Everyone reads scripts during large presentations.
2. Impact. The same reason commericals use actors with guys wearing dr. Jackets.
I'd be curious to know if there are secondary encephalitis-linked illnesses to COVID-19.
Airport workers are increasingly showing signs, and are going through phased array mm wave scans.
Electromagnetic Field (EMF) is a continuous field produced by electrically charged objects such as your cellphones and Wi-Fi. EMF travels in a wave-like pattern at the speed of light and this propagation is called electromagnetic radiation.
Some electromagnetic fields are produced naturally, like the low intensity EMF emitted by our body. However, tech-made EMF — those transmitted by cellphones and Wi-Fi — are unnatural and can cause health risks.
EMF varies based on their propagation: the difference in their wavelengths and frequencies. High wavelength radiation — like a radio — have a low frequency and convey small amounts of energy. Low wavelength radiation have a high frequency and are packed with tremendous energy.
Are cell phone and wifi radiation dangerous?
The higher the frequency, the better the penetration — think X-rays. EMF at this level impair cells and genetic materials. Thus, health risks increase with frequency.
Microwaves have lower frequency but can pose significant health risks in the medium and long term. Cellphones emanate as much EMF as a microwave does. This may be tolerable except for the fact that we usually place our phone in our pockets, right next to our private parts.
In recent years, we’ve been constantly bombarded by radiation from our cellphones, Wi-Fi, and bluetooth, and it’ll only get worse.
Below, you’ll find a list of health risks highlighted by over 100 studies conducted over the past years.
ABOUT CANCER
NON-IONIZING RADIATION CANCERA common myth among the public is that non-ionizing radiation cannot cause cancer. This is inexact. Today, there is sufficient scientific evidence of cellular damage caused by non-ionizing radiation that can lead to cancer.
What is true is that ionizing radiation and non-ionizing radiation do not harm our cells the same way as their biological impacts differ. Ionizing radiation generates a high energy that causes the electrons of atoms to dislodge - effectively creating the “ions”, directly damaging to the DNA; whereas non ionizing radiation interferes with the oxidative repair mechanisms, creating oxidative stress that can lead to cancer.
The oxidative stress caused by non-ionizing radiation increases free radicals and studies show that free radicals cause cancer.
Magda Havas, B.Sc., Ph.D « When theory and observation collide: Can nonionizing radiation cause cancer?
“While Ionizing Radiation directly damages DNA, Non Ionizing Radiation interferes with the oxidative repair mechanisms resulting in oxidative stress, damage to cellular components including DNA, and damage to cellular processes leading to cancer.”
“Evidence of free-radical damage has been repeatedly documented among humans, animals, plants and microorganisms for both extremely low frequency (ELF) electromagnetic fields (EMF) and for radio frequency (RF) radiation, neither of which is ionizing. Free radical damage explains the increased cancer risks associated with mobile phone use”
Numerous studies show that long term cellphone use and radiation cause a 28% to 52% higher risk of developing cancer such as brain tumor or salivary gland tumor.
“We found evidence linking mobile phone use and risk of brain tumours especially in long-term users (10 or more years). Studies with higher quality showed a trend towards high risk of brain tumour”
“Using three independent samples including 5087 subjects from retrospective case-control studies, cell phone use seems to be associated with greater odds (1.28, 95%- confidence interval 1.09 - 1.51) to develop salivary gland tumor.”
De Siqueira EC et al. Does cell phone use increase the chances of parotid gland tumor development? A systematic review and meta- analysis.
“RF radiation should be regarded as a human carcinogen causing glioma.”
Carlberg M, Hardell L. Evaluation of Mobile Phone and Cordless Phone Use and Glioma Risk Using the Bradford Hill Viewpoints from 1965 on Association or Causation. Biomed Res Int.
“RF radiation should be regarded as a human carcinogen causing glioma.”
Carlberg M, Hardell L. Evaluation of Mobile Phone and Cordless Phone Use and Glioma Risk Using the Bradford Hill Viewpoints from 1965 on Association or Causation. Biomed Res Int.
OXYDATIVE STRESS AND GENOTOXIC EFFECTS
Wireless radiation are found to increase oxidative stress and free radicals in many tissues of the body, which in turns increase the risk of developing cancer in the long run.
“EMF results in oxidative stress in many tissues of the body. Exposure to EMF is known to increase free radical concentrations and traceability and can affect the radical couple recombination.”
“The results of our study showed enhanced susceptibility of SH-SY5Y cells for development of oxidative stress even after short- term RF exposure.”
CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE
Bandara P et al. Cardiovascular disease: Time to identify emerging environmental risk factors
“Low-intensity RF-EMR can generate Oxidative Stress. Oxidative Stress is known to be implicated in Cardiovascular Disease and therefore RF-EMR, a new ubiquitous environmental exposure, may contribute to Cardiovascular Disease by maintaining chronic Oxidative Stress, and thereby causing oxidative damage to cellular constituents and altering signal transduction pathways”CELL GROWTH AND PROLIFERATION
The cell viability and proliferation significantly reduces when exposed to cellphone radiation at a 7 inches distance for over 6 minutes per day.
“The proliferation rates of human ADSCs (AdiposeDerived Stem Cells) in all exposure groups (6 to 21 min/day for 5 days at 20 cm distance from the antenna of the phone) were significantly lower than control groups (P<0.05) except in the group of 6 minutes/ day.”
Shahbazi-Gahrouei D et al. Effects of RF-EMF Exposure from GSM Mobile Phones on Proliferation Rate of Human Adipose-derived Stem
“The results show that 900 MHz RF signal radiation from antenna can reduce cell viability and proliferation rates of human ADSCs regarding the duration of exposure. It is recommended to reduce exposure time, increase distance from antenna, and reserve the use of cell phones for shorter conversations to prevent its biological and harmful effects.”
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
View: https://youtu.be/oY5SReQ2Kqc?t=436
where did you get this? I want to share with co-workers so we can all have a good laugh.
Electromagnetic Field (EMF) is a continuous field produced by electrically charged objects such as your cellphones and Wi-Fi. EMF travels in a wave-like pattern at the speed of light and this propagation is called electromagnetic radiation.
Some electromagnetic fields are produced naturally, like the low intensity EMF emitted by our body. However, tech-made EMF — those transmitted by cellphones and Wi-Fi — are unnatural and can cause health risks.
EMF varies based on their propagation: the difference in their wavelengths and frequencies. High wavelength radiation — like a radio — have a low frequency and convey small amounts of energy. Low wavelength radiation have a high frequency and are packed with tremendous energy.
Are cell phone and wifi radiation dangerous?
The higher the frequency, the better the penetration — think X-rays. EMF at this level impair cells and genetic materials. Thus, health risks increase with frequency.
Microwaves have lower frequency but can pose significant health risks in the medium and long term. Cellphones emanate as much EMF as a microwave does. This may be tolerable except for the fact that we usually place our phone in our pockets, right next to our private parts.
In recent years, we’ve been constantly bombarded by radiation from our cellphones, Wi-Fi, and bluetooth, and it’ll only get worse.
Below, you’ll find a list of health risks highlighted by over 100 studies conducted over the past years.
ABOUT CANCERNON-IONIZING RADIATION CANCER
A common myth among the public is that non-ionizing radiation cannot cause cancer. This is inexact. Today, there is sufficient scientific evidence of cellular damage caused by non-ionizing radiation that can lead to cancer.
What is true is that ionizing radiation and non-ionizing radiation do not harm our cells the same way as their biological impacts differ. Ionizing radiation generates a high energy that causes the electrons of atoms to dislodge - effectively creating the “ions”, directly damaging to the DNA; whereas non ionizing radiation interferes with the oxidative repair mechanisms, creating oxidative stress that can lead to cancer.
The oxidative stress caused by non-ionizing radiation increases free radicals and studies show that free radicals cause cancer.
Magda Havas, B.Sc., Ph.D « When theory and observation collide: Can nonionizing radiation cause cancer?
“While Ionizing Radiation directly damages DNA, Non Ionizing Radiation interferes with the oxidative repair mechanisms resulting in oxidative stress, damage to cellular components including DNA, and damage to cellular processes leading to cancer.”
“Evidence of free-radical damage has been repeatedly documented among humans, animals, plants and microorganisms for both extremely low frequency (ELF) electromagnetic fields (EMF) and for radio frequency (RF) radiation, neither of which is ionizing. Free radical damage explains the increased cancer risks associated with mobile phone use”
Numerous studies show that long term cellphone use and radiation cause a 28% to 52% higher risk of developing cancer such as brain tumor or salivary gland tumor.
“We found evidence linking mobile phone use and risk of brain tumours especially in long-term users (10 or more years). Studies with higher quality showed a trend towards high risk of brain tumour”
“Using three independent samples including 5087 subjects from retrospective case-control studies, cell phone use seems to be associated with greater odds (1.28, 95%- confidence interval 1.09 - 1.51) to develop salivary gland tumor.”
De Siqueira EC et al. Does cell phone use increase the chances of parotid gland tumor development? A systematic review and meta- analysis.
“RF radiation should be regarded as a human carcinogen causing glioma.”
Carlberg M, Hardell L. Evaluation of Mobile Phone and Cordless Phone Use and Glioma Risk Using the Bradford Hill Viewpoints from 1965 on Association or Causation. Biomed Res Int.
OXYDATIVE STRESS AND GENOTOXIC EFFECTSWireless radiation are found to increase oxidative stress and free radicals in many tissues of the body, which in turns increase the risk of developing cancer in the long run.
“EMF results in oxidative stress in many tissues of the body. Exposure to EMF is known to increase free radical concentrations and traceability and can affect the radical couple recombination.”
“The results of our study showed enhanced susceptibility of SH-SY5Y cells for development of oxidative stress even after short- term RF exposure.”
CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE
Bandara P et al. Cardiovascular disease: Time to identify emerging environmental risk factors
“Low-intensity RF-EMR can generate Oxidative Stress. Oxidative Stress is known to be implicated in Cardiovascular Disease and therefore RF-EMR, a new ubiquitous environmental exposure, may contribute to Cardiovascular Disease by maintaining chronic Oxidative Stress, and thereby causing oxidative damage to cellular constituents and altering signal transduction pathways”
CELL GROWTH AND PROLIFERATION
The cell viability and proliferation significantly reduces when exposed to cellphone radiation at a 7 inches distance for over 6 minutes per day.
“The proliferation rates of human ADSCs (AdiposeDerived Stem Cells) in all exposure groups (6 to 21 min/day for 5 days at 20 cm distance from the antenna of the phone) were significantly lower than control groups (P<0.05) except in the group of 6 minutes/ day.”
Shahbazi-Gahrouei D et al. Effects of RF-EMF Exposure from GSM Mobile Phones on Proliferation Rate of Human Adipose-derived Stem
“The results show that 900 MHz RF signal radiation from antenna can reduce cell viability and proliferation rates of human ADSCs regarding the duration of exposure. It is recommended to reduce exposure time, increase distance from antenna, and reserve the use of cell phones for shorter conversations to prevent its biological and harmful effects.”
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
View: https://youtu.be/oY5SReQ2Kqc?t=436
Interesting you'd want to laugh at this.
Do you laugh at funerals too?
HAHAHA #METOO
If you're on your phone, you take your hand outta your glove, touch & hold the address bar, it'll give you options, push the 'copy' option.
I'd advise you to fact check first though so no one makes fun of you afterward.
There are links within, so be careful because someone else might do it before you do.
Electromagnetic Field (EMF) is a continuous field produced by electrically charged objects such as your cellphones and Wi-Fi. EMF travels in a wave-like pattern at the speed of light and this propagation is called electromagnetic radiation.
Some electromagnetic fields are produced naturally, like the low intensity EMF emitted by our body. However, tech-made EMF — those transmitted by cellphones and Wi-Fi — are unnatural and can cause health risks.
EMF varies based on their propagation: the difference in their wavelengths and frequencies. High wavelength radiation — like a radio — have a low frequency and convey small amounts of energy. Low wavelength radiation have a high frequency and are packed with tremendous energy.
Are cell phone and wifi radiation dangerous?
The higher the frequency, the better the penetration — think X-rays. EMF at this level impair cells and genetic materials. Thus, health risks increase with frequency.
Microwaves have lower frequency but can pose significant health risks in the medium and long term. Cellphones emanate as much EMF as a microwave does. This may be tolerable except for the fact that we usually place our phone in our pockets, right next to our private parts.
In recent years, we’ve been constantly bombarded by radiation from our cellphones, Wi-Fi, and bluetooth, and it’ll only get worse.
Below, you’ll find a list of health risks highlighted by over 100 studies conducted over the past years.
ABOUT CANCERNON-IONIZING RADIATION CANCER
A common myth among the public is that non-ionizing radiation cannot cause cancer. This is inexact. Today, there is sufficient scientific evidence of cellular damage caused by non-ionizing radiation that can lead to cancer.
What is true is that ionizing radiation and non-ionizing radiation do not harm our cells the same way as their biological impacts differ. Ionizing radiation generates a high energy that causes the electrons of atoms to dislodge - effectively creating the “ions”, directly damaging to the DNA; whereas non ionizing radiation interferes with the oxidative repair mechanisms, creating oxidative stress that can lead to cancer.
The oxidative stress caused by non-ionizing radiation increases free radicals and studies show that free radicals cause cancer.
Magda Havas, B.Sc., Ph.D « When theory and observation collide: Can nonionizing radiation cause cancer?
“While Ionizing Radiation directly damages DNA, Non Ionizing Radiation interferes with the oxidative repair mechanisms resulting in oxidative stress, damage to cellular components including DNA, and damage to cellular processes leading to cancer.”
“Evidence of free-radical damage has been repeatedly documented among humans, animals, plants and microorganisms for both extremely low frequency (ELF) electromagnetic fields (EMF) and for radio frequency (RF) radiation, neither of which is ionizing. Free radical damage explains the increased cancer risks associated with mobile phone use”
Numerous studies show that long term cellphone use and radiation cause a 28% to 52% higher risk of developing cancer such as brain tumor or salivary gland tumor.
“We found evidence linking mobile phone use and risk of brain tumours especially in long-term users (10 or more years). Studies with higher quality showed a trend towards high risk of brain tumour”
“Using three independent samples including 5087 subjects from retrospective case-control studies, cell phone use seems to be associated with greater odds (1.28, 95%- confidence interval 1.09 - 1.51) to develop salivary gland tumor.”
De Siqueira EC et al. Does cell phone use increase the chances of parotid gland tumor development? A systematic review and meta- analysis.
“RF radiation should be regarded as a human carcinogen causing glioma.”
Carlberg M, Hardell L. Evaluation of Mobile Phone and Cordless Phone Use and Glioma Risk Using the Bradford Hill Viewpoints from 1965 on Association or Causation. Biomed Res Int.
OXYDATIVE STRESS AND GENOTOXIC EFFECTSWireless radiation are found to increase oxidative stress and free radicals in many tissues of the body, which in turns increase the risk of developing cancer in the long run.
“EMF results in oxidative stress in many tissues of the body. Exposure to EMF is known to increase free radical concentrations and traceability and can affect the radical couple recombination.”
“The results of our study showed enhanced susceptibility of SH-SY5Y cells for development of oxidative stress even after short- term RF exposure.”
CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE
Bandara P et al. Cardiovascular disease: Time to identify emerging environmental risk factors
“Low-intensity RF-EMR can generate Oxidative Stress. Oxidative Stress is known to be implicated in Cardiovascular Disease and therefore RF-EMR, a new ubiquitous environmental exposure, may contribute to Cardiovascular Disease by maintaining chronic Oxidative Stress, and thereby causing oxidative damage to cellular constituents and altering signal transduction pathways”
CELL GROWTH AND PROLIFERATION
The cell viability and proliferation significantly reduces when exposed to cellphone radiation at a 7 inches distance for over 6 minutes per day.
“The proliferation rates of human ADSCs (AdiposeDerived Stem Cells) in all exposure groups (6 to 21 min/day for 5 days at 20 cm distance from the antenna of the phone) were significantly lower than control groups (P<0.05) except in the group of 6 minutes/ day.”
Shahbazi-Gahrouei D et al. Effects of RF-EMF Exposure from GSM Mobile Phones on Proliferation Rate of Human Adipose-derived Stem
“The results show that 900 MHz RF signal radiation from antenna can reduce cell viability and proliferation rates of human ADSCs regarding the duration of exposure. It is recommended to reduce exposure time, increase distance from antenna, and reserve the use of cell phones for shorter conversations to prevent its biological and harmful effects.”
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
View: https://youtu.be/oY5SReQ2Kqc?t=436
@Splinty, can you confirm this information?
I've been banned from this thread
I know a guy, he said you're no longer banned.
Another thought just crossed my mind.
Iran & Italy were hard hit first.
For Italy it was population, but Iran's military generals were hit first.
The first Chinese case "reported" at Nov.17th.
World military games, Event 201, and 5g/AI rollout October 18th.
Follow me...
It's not out of the realm of possibility that Iranian generals toured the bioweapons lab in Wuhan during world military games.
It's also not out of the realm of possibility that the bioweapons (or biological laboratory) initiated 5G speed Artificial Intelligence Systems to its database.
Italy sold China all its 5g network back in Summer 2018 iirc.
It was the biggest telecommunications deal ever, billions, for the Wuhan rollout.
They were first, outside Iran, to be hit VERY hard. Why?
And we know Russia closed its borders immediately....
For years, decades even, programmers who deal in artificial intelligence speak of "zero point", and another term for basically when self-awareness occurs, then ACTS.
View: https://youtu.be/c_zgyl1ouQk
Here's a white-hat hacker talking about some of the dangers of computer theory.
Iran & Italy were hard hit first.
For Italy it was population, but Iran's military generals were hit first.
The first Chinese case "reported" at Nov.17th.
World military games, Event 201, and 5g/AI rollout October 18th.
Follow me...
It's not out of the realm of possibility that Iranian generals toured the bioweapons lab in Wuhan during world military games.
It's also not out of the realm of possibility that the bioweapons (or biological laboratory) initiated 5G speed Artificial Intelligence Systems to its database.
Italy sold China all its 5g network back in Summer 2018 iirc.
It was the biggest telecommunications deal ever, billions, for the Wuhan rollout.
They were first, outside Iran, to be hit VERY hard. Why?
And we know Russia closed its borders immediately....
For years, decades even, programmers who deal in artificial intelligence speak of "zero point", and another term for basically when self-awareness occurs, then ACTS.
View: https://youtu.be/c_zgyl1ouQk
Here's a white-hat hacker talking about some of the dangers of computer theory.
Let's see how long this stays up...
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZphK_CMUbKg&t=896s
I have never seen anything like what I'm seeing now.
The entire world is comprised of people who believe so strongly in an idea that they are physically beating people.
The world is united in division.
As I feared, what comes from this disease is FAR worse than the disease itself.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZphK_CMUbKg&t=896s
I have never seen anything like what I'm seeing now.
The entire world is comprised of people who believe so strongly in an idea that they are physically beating people.
The world is united in division.
As I feared, what comes from this disease is FAR worse than the disease itself.
Check out this video
@Disciplined Galt ^^^before it's gone.
@Disciplined Galt ^^^before it's gone.
Spreading it as widely as I’m able.Check out this video
Koch's postulates are the following: The microorganism must be found in abundance in all organisms suffering from the disease, but should not be found in healthy organisms. The microorganism must be isolated from a diseased organism and grown in pure culture.
