General Electile Dysfunction: an election that lasts longer than 4 days is a serious medical problem

  • Thread starter Deleted member 1
  • Start date
Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up
D

Deleted member 1

Guest

Is this real? I hope so because I read every damn word of it. Section XI really challenged me.
THE MINORITY FALSELY ACCUSED THE CHAIRMEN OF ENGAGING IN A
RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN AND USED OTHER TACTICS TO
INTERFERE IN THE INVESTIGATION.
a. Introduction
Since the majority began its investigation, the Ranking Members have attempted to
mischaracterize its scope in an effort to cast doubt on its eventual findings. They have done so,
in part, by spreading an unfounded conspiracy theory rooted in a foreign-sourced influence
campaign publicly identified by the Intelligence Community (IC).207 Specifically, Democrats,
not just the Ranking Members, relied upon materials and statements from foreign nationals who
are attempting to influence U.S. politics to levy unsupported and demonstrably inaccurate
allegations linking the majority’s investigation to those same unreliable foreign nationals.
As part of their efforts, Democrats laundered their unclassified speculation through
classified analysis of intelligence reporting to fabricate a veneer of credibility in an effort to
shield their claims from public scrutiny. Those false claims were then leaked to friendly media
outlets, which reported them as fact. Together, these networks of Democratic offices and liberal
press outlets have worked to weave fact with fiction in order to construct a false narrative
designed to undercut and discredit the Chairmen’s investigation and its eventual findings. In the
process, Democrats relied upon and disseminated disinformation from foreign sources, such as
Ukrainian official Andriy Derkach, whom the IC has publicly warned are actively seeking to
influence U.S. politics.208
Thus the Democrats, specifically the Ranking Members, have engaged
in a disinformation campaign, not Chairmen Grassley or Johnson.



Needs bipartisan eval. This is silly and colors the whole thing with this type of back and forth.
 

nuraknu

savage
Jul 20, 2016
6,247
10,755

sparkuri

Pulse on the finger of The Cimmunity
First 100
Jan 16, 2015
37,765
49,642
I want everyone to think trump will win. Maybe all the lazy do nothing Demonrats will stay home and watch bre bre memorials on youtube instead of voting

Yeah....bout that.

They're putting Biden ahead in the polls so rioting occurs WHEN he loses.
People will lose their minds and set fire to capitals & major cities, not BELIEVING he could win.
"How is this possible? (Math)
"My parents really ARE racist!!!"
(I hate my dad)

Then insurgent act, martial law, Covid-Super Morph, military vaccine rollouts, checkpoints, digidollar(fedcoin), cashless society,etc. Etc....

That February 2019 state of the union "America will never be socialist" was a throwdown of the gauntlet.
 

Shinkicker

For what it's worth
Jan 30, 2016
10,406
13,878
THE MINORITY FALSELY ACCUSED THE CHAIRMEN OF ENGAGING IN A
RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN AND USED OTHER TACTICS TO
INTERFERE IN THE INVESTIGATION.
a. Introduction
Since the majority began its investigation, the Ranking Members have attempted to
mischaracterize its scope in an effort to cast doubt on its eventual findings. They have done so,
in part, by spreading an unfounded conspiracy theory rooted in a foreign-sourced influence
campaign publicly identified by the Intelligence Community (IC).207 Specifically, Democrats,
not just the Ranking Members, relied upon materials and statements from foreign nationals who
are attempting to influence U.S. politics to levy unsupported and demonstrably inaccurate
allegations linking the majority’s investigation to those same unreliable foreign nationals.
As part of their efforts, Democrats laundered their unclassified speculation through
classified analysis of intelligence reporting to fabricate a veneer of credibility in an effort to
shield their claims from public scrutiny. Those false claims were then leaked to friendly media
outlets, which reported them as fact. Together, these networks of Democratic offices and liberal
press outlets have worked to weave fact with fiction in order to construct a false narrative
designed to undercut and discredit the Chairmen’s investigation and its eventual findings. In the
process, Democrats relied upon and disseminated disinformation from foreign sources, such as
Ukrainian official Andriy Derkach, whom the IC has publicly warned are actively seeking to
influence U.S. politics.208
Thus the Democrats, specifically the Ranking Members, have engaged
in a disinformation campaign, not Chairmen Grassley or Johnson.



Needs bipartisan eval. This is silly and colors the whole thing with this type of back and forth.
The part you quoted is silly.

That's why I mentioned part X1. That seems to be the one that should be able to be verified or disproved pretty handily. Right? Following the money.
 

Shinkicker

For what it's worth
Jan 30, 2016
10,406
13,878
I just read the conclusion. They don't seem to accuse Joe Biden of anything? In terms of the actual administration, John Kerry seems to be the only one they are outright accusing of any wrongdoing, and then nonspecific "Democrats".
If you found out that Joe Biden was accepting money made by helping members of the communist Chinese party launder money and invest it in the United States, (for the sake of argument we will say this occurred after he left office) would that influence your decision of whether or not he should be our President?
 

nuraknu

savage
Jul 20, 2016
6,247
10,755
If you found out that Joe Biden was accepting money made by helping members of the communist Chinese party launder money and invest it in the United States, (for the sake of argument we will say this occurred after he left office) would that influence your decision of whether or not he should be our President?
Normally, yes, but I guess I'd have to look at the other options -- it's not like we've been given much great choice in this election or the last one.

Is there anything in the document that actually accuses him of some wrongdoing or a real connection to any of these activities? Is he an owner of a company or something like that?
 

tang

too high to rigg
Oct 21, 2015
9,400
12,397
Normally, yes, but I guess I'd have to look at the other options -- it's not like we've been given much great choice in this election or the last one.

Is there anything in the document that actually accuses him of some wrongdoing or a real connection to any of these activities? Is he an owner of a company or something like that?

View: https://youtu.be/3i-t3SHNtS0
 

Shinkicker

For what it's worth
Jan 30, 2016
10,406
13,878
Normally, yes, but I guess I'd have to look at the other options -- it's not like we've been given much great choice in this election or the last one.

Is there anything in the document that actually accuses him of some wrongdoing or a real connection to any of these activities? Is he an owner of a company or something like that?
IMG_2218.PNG
 
T

The Big Guy

Guest
1> who are these people and what connects this to Joe Biden?

2> joe biden was a private citizen over a year out of office at that time...when is he allowed to be part of any business?
It's this guy. I thought George prepped you guys for this stuff