THE MINORITY FALSELY ACCUSED THE CHAIRMEN OF ENGAGING IN A
Is this real? I hope so because I read every damn word of it. Section XI really challenged me.
I just read the conclusion. They don't seem to accuse Joe Biden of anything? In terms of the actual administration, John Kerry seems to be the only one they are outright accusing of any wrongdoing, and then nonspecific "Democrats".
Is this real? I hope so because I read every damn word of it. Section XI really challenged me.
1> who are these people and what connects this to Joe Biden?
2> joe biden was a private citizen over a year out of office at that time...when is he allowed to be part of any business?
"Images of alleged child endangerment"
This guy?Vice did a fun 10 minute segment on the evangelicals. I watch vice sometimes because I’m friends with a big time important editor there.
I want everyone to think trump will win. Maybe all the lazy do nothing Demonrats will stay home and watch bre bre memorials on youtube instead of voting
The part you quoted is silly.THE MINORITY FALSELY ACCUSED THE CHAIRMEN OF ENGAGING IN A
RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN AND USED OTHER TACTICS TO
INTERFERE IN THE INVESTIGATION.
a. Introduction
Since the majority began its investigation, the Ranking Members have attempted to
mischaracterize its scope in an effort to cast doubt on its eventual findings. They have done so,
in part, by spreading an unfounded conspiracy theory rooted in a foreign-sourced influence
campaign publicly identified by the Intelligence Community (IC).207 Specifically, Democrats,
not just the Ranking Members, relied upon materials and statements from foreign nationals who
are attempting to influence U.S. politics to levy unsupported and demonstrably inaccurate
allegations linking the majority’s investigation to those same unreliable foreign nationals.
As part of their efforts, Democrats laundered their unclassified speculation through
classified analysis of intelligence reporting to fabricate a veneer of credibility in an effort to
shield their claims from public scrutiny. Those false claims were then leaked to friendly media
outlets, which reported them as fact. Together, these networks of Democratic offices and liberal
press outlets have worked to weave fact with fiction in order to construct a false narrative
designed to undercut and discredit the Chairmen’s investigation and its eventual findings. In the
process, Democrats relied upon and disseminated disinformation from foreign sources, such as
Ukrainian official Andriy Derkach, whom the IC has publicly warned are actively seeking to
influence U.S. politics.208
Thus the Democrats, specifically the Ranking Members, have engaged
in a disinformation campaign, not Chairmen Grassley or Johnson.
Needs bipartisan eval. This is silly and colors the whole thing with this type of back and forth.
If you found out that Joe Biden was accepting money made by helping members of the communist Chinese party launder money and invest it in the United States, (for the sake of argument we will say this occurred after he left office) would that influence your decision of whether or not he should be our President?I just read the conclusion. They don't seem to accuse Joe Biden of anything? In terms of the actual administration, John Kerry seems to be the only one they are outright accusing of any wrongdoing, and then nonspecific "Democrats".
Normally, yes, but I guess I'd have to look at the other options -- it's not like we've been given much great choice in this election or the last one.If you found out that Joe Biden was accepting money made by helping members of the communist Chinese party launder money and invest it in the United States, (for the sake of argument we will say this occurred after he left office) would that influence your decision of whether or not he should be our President?
Apparently he's was caught in a curious position in the new borat film. Maybe it's a nothing burger, but we shall see.why?
Normally, yes, but I guess I'd have to look at the other options -- it's not like we've been given much great choice in this election or the last one.
Is there anything in the document that actually accuses him of some wrongdoing or a real connection to any of these activities? Is he an owner of a company or something like that?
Normally, yes, but I guess I'd have to look at the other options -- it's not like we've been given much great choice in this election or the last one.
Is there anything in the document that actually accuses him of some wrongdoing or a real connection to any of these activities? Is he an owner of a company or something like that?
It's this guy. I thought George prepped you guys for this stuff1> who are these people and what connects this to Joe Biden?
2> joe biden was a private citizen over a year out of office at that time...when is he allowed to be part of any business?