They might have also said “YOLO! No ragrets. 420 blaze it.”They also might have had the file come across their desk and gone "This seems like horseshit but we should probably look into it. Better safe than sorry."
Are you saying his statement is outlandish and not based in reality?They might have also said “YOLO! No ragrets. 420 blaze it.”
they probably didn’t but they might have
Forgot the "let's cut the postal service" part
Were there states that extended the deadline right before the election?
For believing people can make their own decisions?I'm very disappointed in you.
For disregarding the importance of the legal process because in this case the legal process involves something you don't agree with and then reducing the actions of a group of GOP malcontent fund raisers down to something so simple. Even if those lawyers are doing something they agree with because "muh Trump" doxing them is still both morally wrong and against the twitter TOS.For believing people can make their own decisions?
Lawyers turn down cases all the time, it wouldn't be put of the ordinary for that.For disregarding the importance of the legal process because in this case the legal process involves something you don't agree with and then reducing the actions of a group of GOP malcontent fund raisers down to something so simple. Even if those lawyers are doing something they agree with because "muh Trump" doxing them is still both morally wrong and against the twitter TOS.
And although I disagree with you, as I would regardless the field someone works in, but you're certainly entitled to your opinion.Court cases and who lawyers work for a public record, I personally don't agree that what they did is doxing because of this.
Which part? Or both?And although I disagree with you, as I would regardless the field someone works in, but you're certainly entitled to your opinion.
I thought I only quoted one part, did I not?Which part? Or both?
I see I see, that's fair imo. I can understand your position.I thought I only quoted one part, did I not?
I also disagree that lawyers frequently refuse cases, but that's based on anecdotes from the handful of lawyers I know so it didn't strike me as a productive conversation worth us engaging in.I see I see, that's fair imo. I can understand your position.
I'm not a lawyer and don't really hang with them, I prefer Doctors, but google seems to believe lawyers regularly turn down cases, at least in Murica. Canadian lawyers are probably, maybe, more polite.I also disagree that lawyers frequently refuse cases, but that's based on anecdotes from the handful of lawyers I know so it didn't strike me as a productive conversation worth us engaging in.
When I looked I found a lot of "Here's why a lawyer turned down your case." but nothing in the way of statistics. As I said, didn't seem like it was going to be productive to anyone involved so fuck it.I'm not a lawyer and don't really hang with them, I prefer Doctors, but google seems to believe lawyers regularly turn down cases, at least in Murica. Canadian lawyers are probably, maybe, more polite.
do lawyers regulary turn down vlients - Google Search
www.google.com