Bret Weinstein obviously knows his stuff when discussing evolutionary biology. But he regularly platforms idiots and then himself echoes their message. He has shoehorned himself into be an "intellectual dark web" scientist and with it gives credence without critical review to everyone he has on.
Take Steve Kirsch who was on like 2 weeks ago...
He wrote this which was also foundationally part of the Bret Weinstein podcast conversation and what Kirsch promoted:
Note that views expressed in this opinion article are the writer’s personal views and not necessarily those of TrialSite
trialsitenews.com
He is linking htis:
That is NOT what that paper says. He is accidentally/intentionally twisting the facts to meet his false narrative.
What does the paper show?
Code:
When were women vaccinated:
2.3% periconception(didn't know they were pregnant at time of vaccination) - 92 women
28.6% 1st Trimester - 1132 women
43.3% 2nd Trimester - 1714 women
25.7% 3rd Trimester - 1019 women
104 were spontaneous abortions that occurred at less than 20 weeks
There was 1 stillbirth.
This is completely inline with average miscarriage stats!
Maybe kirsch made a mistake?
Pretty hard to do when the papers own authors concluded:
Snakeoil salesman and if you run a podcast with this message supported and promoted without any critical questioning of the misinformation, you might run afoul of a companies guidelines.