Why do females think they can hit men and expect no consequences?

[1031]

Could somebody please answer my question directly instead of making vague references to hypothetical scenarios occurring on the extreme end of the spectrum?
Here it is again:
is anyone here actually arguing that a man is NOT within his rights to defend himself from someone who is using or attempting to use physical violence against him?

 

[Emmery Myers]

Could somebody please answer my question directly instead of making vague references to hypothetical scenarios occurring on the extreme end of the spectrum?
Here it is again:
is anyone here actually arguing that a man is NOT within his rights to defend himself from someone who is using or attempting to use physical violence against him?

Nope.

 

[1031]

Nope.

Thank you.

 

[FeeO]

Breaking anyone's jaw in this thread would be a useless endeavor. Admittedly, I could see utility in breaking 8 to 10 fingers of some of these posters though. Then maybe this 7 page quest to justify needing to hit women might finally rest in piece.

Violence is utilitarian, often. The question is, who gets to dispense it, and why? How do we as a society decide and enforce this? Along what lines of logic and morality? I think gender is too crude a line.

 

[Emmery Myers]

Violence is utilitarian, often. The question is, who gets to dispense it, and why? How do we as a society decide and enforce this? Along what lines of logic and morality? I think gender is too crude a line.

Anyone who is on the wrong end of Mel and my opinions is fair game, imo. This is the demarcation line im coolest w

 

[OhWhopDaChamp]

And. I have actively

wait...is anyone here actually arguing that a man is NOT within his rights to defend himself from someone who is using or attempting to use physical violence against him?

we are arguing the mentality of men who feel that they can enforce strength in an equally dysfunctional relationship rather than being a healthy person and choosing not to. Basically how fragile is your male ego.

 

[OhWhopDaChamp]

Lemme state again, I only date and beat up non bitchmade men. If you're a lil crying as bitch I treat you like a woman. No strikes. Crybaby

 

[OhWhopDaChamp]

You have already said that you attack men and have gone 6-0. My stance that a man can stick up for himself would very much hinder your style.

Legally, men are within their rights to defend themselves. Deal with it. And stop mentioning me.

I'll mention you whenever the mood strikes. And guess what? You'll receive it. It's in your nature. Deal with that fact Son

 

[1031]

And. I have actively

we are arguing the mentality of men who feel that they can enforce strength in an equally dysfunctional relationship rather than being a healthy person and choosing not to. Basically how fragile is your male ego.

So are you endorsing the notion that a man is NOT within his rights to defend himself against someone who is using or attempting to use physical violence?
Yes or No?

 

[Passive Jay]

If you all don't start getting along I am going to punch all of you!
or have sex with all of you, i haven't figured it out yet.

 

[1031]

If you all don't start getting along I am going to punch all of you!
or have sex with all of you, i haven't figured it out yet.

I'll sign up for the punch...even if I'm trying to get along with everyone. The thought of having to deal with the alternative advances gives me the heebee-jeebees

 

[Passive Jay]

I'll sign up for the punch...even if I'm trying to get along with everyone. The thought of having to deal with the alternative advances gives me the heebee-jeebees

Thats a good idea, I am not very strong yet so I punch like a little girl... with cancer... and no arms...

 

[Leigh]

Could somebody please answer my question directly instead of making vague references to hypothetical scenarios occurring on the extreme end of the spectrum?
Here it is again:
is anyone here actually arguing that a man is NOT within his rights to defend himself from someone who is using or attempting to use physical violence against him?

Yes they are. I have said defending yourself is acceptable and specifically stated that it doesn't include punching a woman. People are disagreeing with my stance.

 

[OhWhopDaChamp]

So are you endorsing the notion that a man is NOT within his rights to defend himself against someone who is using or attempting to use physical violence?
Yes or No?

I'm endorsing healthy choices. Is it wrong to commit domestic violence? Yes. Do some situations ( gender and race) require an individual to be the better person and walk away? Yes.
Not all things can be equal based on intrinsic differences. My 6 victims fought back. Fruitlessly. The better choice is to determine this person is damaged and I'm not gone do this. A heavy burden? Possibly. But rather than argue the right to dispense violence I'd rather roh roh healthy choices.

 

[1031]

I'm endorsing healthy choices. Is it wrong to commit domestic violence? Yes. Do some situations ( gender and race) require an individual to be the better person and walk away? Yes.
Not all things can be equal based on intrinsic differences. My 6 victims dough back. Fruitlessly. The better choice is to determine this person is damaged and I'm not gone do this. A heavy burden? Possibly. But rather than argue the right to dispense violence I'd rather roh roh healthy choices.

It was a YES/NO question, that's a binary option. Your response seems to be answering a different question.
Please summarize your answer to either a YES or a NO to the following question:
Are you endorsing the notion that a man is NOT within his rights to defend himself against someone who is using or attempting to use physical violence?

 

[1031]

Thats a good idea, I am not very strong yet so I punch like a little girl... with cancer... and no arms...

I'm feeling better and better about my choice.

 

[OhWhopDaChamp]

It was a YES/NO question, that's a binary option. Your response seems to be answering a different question.
Please summarize your answer to either a YES or a NO to the following question:
Are you endorsing the notion that a man is NOT within his rights to defend himself against someone who is using or attempting to use physical violence?

Quite a lot or ALLOT of things are yes no and unfair. That's the burden that thinking people share. Would I slap you? I'd try not to as I want to be healthy. Would I expect you to strike back? Yes. Come get you some mother fucker. I enjoy it. And will win. Will I cry about it tomorrow? Yes. 7 & 0 means I'm still dysfunctional and not prospering.

The problem I have with these people is the inability to be healthy. It's all, over multiple topics and threads, I wanna be offensive. Waaahh waaahh. I want to hit a bitch back to correct her behavior. I want to be able to say nigga instead of ninja. It's very regotdamndiculous to me. Why not leave a man or woman who is fucked up and hits you? Why refuse to realize that some situations will never be equal? But let's continue to argue the proper response to dysfunction. That works.

It's supremely retarded and makes me think y'all have very small cocks. Good day.

 

[FeeO]

Anyone who is on the wrong end of Mel and my opinions is fair game, imo. This is the demarcation line im coolest w

You'd break 8-10 of my sweet little womanfingers?!

 

[1031]

Quite a lot or ALLOT of things are yes no and unfair. That's the burden that thinking people share. Would I slap you? I'd try not to as I want to be healthy. Would I expect you to strike back? Yes. Come get you some mother fucker. I enjoy it. And will win. Will I cry about it tomorrow? Yes. 7 & 0 means I'm still dysfunctional and not prospering.

The problem I have with these people is the inability to be healthy. It's all, over multiple topics and threads, I wanna be offensive. Waaahh waaahh. I want to hit a bitch back to correct her behavior. I want to be able to say nigga instead of ninja. It's very regotdamndiculous to me. Why not leave a man or woman who is fucked up and hits you? Why refuse to realize that some situations will never be equal? But let's continue to argue the proper response to dysfunction. That works.

It's supremely retarded and makes me think y'all have very small cocks. Good day.

It sounds like you don't understand the question and are angry because of it. I will try to make it simpler for you but I need some time to reword it.

 

[FeeO]

It sounds like you don't understand the question and are angry because of it. I will try to make it simpler for you but I need some time to reword it.

I'm not reading her post like that at all. More that it's better to seek to control yourself, limit yourself, than to focus on what you can get away with when the other party is also practicing destructive behaviour. Could be interpreting her point wrong but it seems logical to me.

 

[Lamont Cranston]

makes me think y'all have very small cocks. Good day.

I have a small cock.

I don't have any comment in this discussion other than that.

I just want to be a part of the thread.

 

[OhWhopDaChamp]

It sounds like you don't understand the question and are angry because of it. I will try to make it simpler for you but I need some time to reword it.

I understand the question. You don't understand the underlying issue. But your picture was cute. So carry on being indignant. You matter.

 

[OhWhopDaChamp]

I have a small cock.

I don't have any comment in this discussion other than that.

I just want to be a part of the thread.

Dougie. You is special. You is kind. Your penis matters.

 

[Lamont Cranston]

Dougie. You is special. You is kind. Your penis matters.

 

[1031]

I'm not reading her post like that at all. More that it's better to seek to control yourself, limit yourself, than to focus on what you can get away with when the other party is also practicing destructive behaviour. Could be interpreting her point wrong but it seems logical to me.

It was a binary question. The answer provided did not address either of the two choices. I don't disagree with the points but they address a question I did not ask.