1
1031
Guest
Then it very much appears like you are avoiding answering the question. Feel free to answer with a yes or no to that question and add an explanation (you seem to like explanations so there's your chance).
And don't tell me that I don't understand the issue, I understand it just fine.
Let's just break it all the way down Cupcake. You felt the need to assert yourself in the convo to make the outspoken woman feel dumb. I said you're cute. Diminish and go about your business. If you clap back on my FeeO it won't be a good forum experience for you. Girl bye
What I can't stand is an ignorant mother fucker talking to me any ol kinda way. Get your life.
I finally got pissed off. You made me laugh. Hush.Don't touch muh balls bebeh!
1
1031
Guest
I'm not sure why you've attempted to make this personal, maybe you're having a bad day. It was a simple question but if you could identify the part where you interpreted my "need to assert [myself]" then please do.
My buck teeth showed. Ok I Lurve you
You made it personal by thinking you can talk to me any ol kind of way. Nah partnah. Read your post again and think about penis. You're pretty dumb and I'm ok with that. Go be coy and dumb far the fuck away from me
1
1031
Guest
Could you please point out the specific words I used and keep in mind the context within which I used them i.e. your response that I was replying to?
Requiring any kind of binary option in debating power-discrepancy violence is the same problem as I have with managing its acceptability along the gender line. It's too crude to apply to the dynamic, and MelE5150's answers reflect that it's too crude for her way of thinking about the problem, too. I wouldn't be able to give you a binary answer on any part of this topic. An intellectually honest answer is a valid answer and she holds herself to unusually high standards of intellectual honesty in my experience.
I'm not saying here, blank, that I think you're a crude thinker. Just that there's not necessarily evasion at work in any non-binary answer considering this messy stuff. The E in my girl's handle isn't for Evasive, heh.
I'm not a teacher. Go ask somebody less who enjoys coquettes
Dougie won my heart when he proved himself to be intellectually honest in the CDN politics thread. Now pandas? Legit.
1
1031
Guest
Dude. Stop. Please. The question was whether a man has the right to defend himself against another person who is either using violence or threatening to use violence. We can agree that violent situations occur for a variety of reasons however, we all must admit that we are not in control of others and sometimes others force violence upon us and, whether through fault of our own, or not, it can be unforeseen. If someone can not answer with either a YES or a NO then it displays an inability to understand the question or an unwillingness to be honest about it.
1
1031
Guest
so you feel I addressed you disrespectfully but cannot identify exactly how or with which words?
Firstly that's a TMMAC Lady of which you can tell be her name and your bitchmade response. I'm not suggesting that you should go ahead and die but I did just bought black thigh boots that I probably would not bless your bitch ass lonely funeral with. I warned you about talking to my FeeO any kind of way pussy. You wanna beef? I'm that bitch you little self important cock sucker. Slurp on all the dick but shut your little kewpie doll lips the fuck up. I'm your huckleberry today. Shithole.
Last edited:
I admit not reading every post. I never hit a woman and have never been hit by a woman.
If a man is being attacked by an aggressive female and he feels as though he may be injured in that attack, then by all means he has the legal right to defend himself.
Every person should have the right to meet violence with violence.
But there is a difference in being attacked by some 5'3" spazz and being attacked by Gabi Garcia, though.
Truthfully, I bet most would agree on when violence is justified, and when too much is too much, if it were looked at on a case by case basis. Hard to speak about this subject in general terms when there are so many variables.
If a man is being attacked by an aggressive female and he feels as though he may be injured in that attack, then by all means he has the legal right to defend himself.
Every person should have the right to meet violence with violence.
But there is a difference in being attacked by some 5'3" spazz and being attacked by Gabi Garcia, though.
Truthfully, I bet most would agree on when violence is justified, and when too much is too much, if it were looked at on a case by case basis. Hard to speak about this subject in general terms when there are so many variables.
I expect all y'all to morn my week of banning. I've been good but he's a cum drinking asshole. And I'm not sorry. Do the Nick Diaz for me. Here
M
member 1013
Guest
Mel are you ok? We can make it through this together. You can hit me and brag about it on the interwebs, call my dick small, whatever and however you need to lash out, I'm here for ya, we can make it through this.
1
1031
Guest
This kind of response is at odds with your previous one regarding mitigating violence through intelligent discourse. There's really no point in trying to make this personal and confrontational, I find it strange that a person would try to do so, especially given the nature of the topic.
What's a TMMAC Lady and why should that deter any of us from honestly and respectfully disagreeing with them?
No, no, that girl stays.I expect all y'all to morn my week of banning. I've been good but he's a cum drinking asshole. And I'm not sorry. Do the Nick Diaz for me. Here