Btw, you should rather use Hurensohn (son of a whore). Much more common.I’m ready
And already dropped it on some unsuspecting co workers to practice View attachment 48934
what's the principle? should more former BigPharma execs be giving more scrutiny to BigPharma?It was a question of principle. There is nothing to read between the lines.
SweeeetBtw, you should rather use Hurensohn (son of a whore). Much more common.
Ideally it would be competent people of integrity I suppose.what's the principle? should more former BigPharma execs be giving more scrutiny to BigPharma?
allow me to restate with emphasis: LoL.
should more foxes be giving more scrutiny to the security of the hen house?
sorry, m8. Not trying to be obtuse, just pointing out that the system is inherently flawed if we're asking people with their life's savings and work invested in a company to put public health before the financial needs of that company.Ideally it would be competent people of integrity I suppose.
But I'm truthfully a little confused what you want to accomplish with these questions.
Oh I don't disagree, and you overestimate my knowledge of your health system by a ton and then some.sorry, m8. Not trying to be obtuse, just pointing out that the system is inherently flawed if we're asking people with their life's savings and work invested in a company to put public health before the financial needs of that company.
reaching a certain level in an industry should disqualify you from a certain level of regulatory responsibility.
at this point, regulation only works to stifle competition and protect the portfolios of industry executives.Oh I don't disagree, and you overestimate my knowledge of your health system by a ton and then some.
My question was not that specific at all. It was just to get a general gauge of whether SS' idea of an answer to the problem big pharma brings is more free market or more restrictions.
@Filthy you responded to one of Qat 's daily gotcha lines directed at me, most days he hits me with one or two(which is fine by the way qat)It was just to get a general gauge of whether SS' idea of an answer to the problem big pharma brings is more free market or more restrictions.
lol..this adds to the fact this was all preplanned@MMAHAWK @Thuglife13 @Sound System @Enock-O-Lypse Now! @sparkuri
This is going to rock your flat earth!
Back in 2015, Bill Gates near flawlessly predicted Covid. Perhaps the biggest "I told you so" in recent history. - Awesome
8,602 points • 624 comments9gag.com
That lil scumbuglol..this adds to the fact this was all preplanned
Gates predicts pandemic?
Fauci predicts pandemic?
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=puqaaeLnEww
What a scum bag for telling us to be prepared as it’s likely to happen?That lil scumbug
No I don't think I would be very surprised.I think you would be very surprised if you knew all that Filthy and Splinty(leaving myself out of it intentionally) know about our Health Care System.
They are supposed to make people think most of the time, not trying to be mean or anything.gotcha lines directed at me
While he was breaking the law and increasing the likelihood that it would happen.What a scum bag for telling us to be prepared as it’s likely to happen?
Secret santa gift for splinty or hug if I ever saw oneIs that a Fanny pack