General Rittenhouse trial

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up
BeardOfKnowledge

BeardOfKnowledge

The Most Consistent Motherfucker You Know
Jul 22, 2015
60,633
56,163
Lars said:
You’re being purposefully obtuse. No one considers the Forest “in public,” and I was speaking colloquially. Crown land is the property of Canada and you are allowed to be there as a member of the public and open carry to hunt, it’s also all rural and wilderness. Take it out in town and see what happens.

also I will talk about the states how I want to, it’s based on my experience actually living there. It’s a shithole. So is Canada, for some of but also different reasons. They both suck. How’s that for an arrogant Canadian?
Click to expand...
Crown land is not all rural.
 
BeardOfKnowledge

BeardOfKnowledge

The Most Consistent Motherfucker You Know
Jul 22, 2015
60,633
56,163
Pak protector said:
Angry and concerned by a fair trial that very clearly exonerated the defendant from the overzealous charges?

Angry and concerned that a panel of jurists came to the conclusion based on evidence presented in a court of law??

Or just not the verdict you wanted because of your feelings??
Click to expand...
This is one of those times where you're encouraged to publicly question the legitimacy of democratic institutions.
 
La Paix

La Paix

Fuck this place
First 100
Jan 14, 2015
38,273
64,363
Pak protector said:
Angry and concerned by a fair trial that very clearly exonerated the defendant from the overzealous charges?

Angry and concerned that a panel of jurists came to the conclusion based on evidence presented in a court of law??

Or just not the verdict you wanted because of your feelings??
Click to expand...
It’s looking like those who are angry and concerned are the ones who took a firm stand on his guilt before any of the facts came out. It would be better for them to say “I don’t fully agree with the verdict but Kyle went through our system and was found not guilty by 12 jurors after the evidence was presented. I shouldn’t of made such bold statements about him before that evidence was public knowledge.”
 
Filthy

Filthy

Iowa Wrestling Champion
Jun 28, 2016
27,507
29,640
Lars said:
What about carrying a loaded semiautomatic rifle with a magazine over allowable size in public
Click to expand...
Rittenhouse needed fewer than 5 rounds per engagement, and showed adequate proficiency in clearing a malf to expect he could execute fast magazine changes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom