FTFYso the reliable sergei lavrov is suggesting that:
- russia "had" to invade
- so that america could tie it down
- and then focus on china
how does that make any sense?
FTFYso the reliable sergei lavrov is suggesting that:
- russia "had" to invade
- so that america could tie it down
- and then focus on china
how does that make any sense?
Apparently you've never bought a drone made in China before.the scary option is that china has thousands up thousands of drones. any army drones would be unstoppable
im still not followingFTFY
It makes perfect sense. Russia is a crucial ally of China. You suck it into a war, isolate it and make it weak. By making it weak you make China weaker.so the reliable sergei lavrov is suggesting that:
- russia chose to invade
- so that america could tie it down
- and then focus on china
how does that make any sense?
russia stated that this isnt a war. that they are just going in as a peace-keeping force against ukranian nazisIt makes perfect sense. Russia is a crucial ally of China. You suck it into a war, isolate it and make it weak. By making it weak you make China weaker.
Everyone in foreign policy is aware that certain things cause certain reactions. To us, they don't necessarily seem "obvious" because we aren't the type of psychopaths who want to have their thumbs on the scale of the world. This tweet might point you in the right direction:im still not following
so he is suggesting that america forced russia to invade, so that theyd get bogged down, which allows america to then focus on china?
sounds like hes playing a deranged victim card
ok so let me reframe thisEveryone in foreign policy is aware that certain things cause certain reactions. To us, they don't necessarily seem "obvious" because we aren't the type of psychopaths who want to have their thumbs on the scale of the world. This tweet might point you in the right direction:
View: https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1494809960286507009
Well, yes, America did in fact fund the Nazis. Congress tried not to fund the Nazis but then they realized there was no way to fund the rest of the Ukrainian Government without funding the Nazis, so they just funded them anyway.russia stated that this isnt a war. that they are just going in as a peace-keeping force against ukranian nazis
so how does america factor into that?
is he suggesting that america funded the nazis?
the main issue is that russia is run by a dictator that kills people who dissentWell, yes, America did in fact fund the Nazis. Congress tried not to fund the Nazis but then they realized there was no way to fund the rest of the Ukrainian Government without funding the Nazis, so they just funded them anyway.
But that is really a minor issue in all of this.
I didn't like that oneI estimate I’ve sat live at 2,500+ MMA fights
The Weidman injury made me nauseous and I had to take an arena walk to avoid puking in my seat.
View attachment 62313
- NATO was founded as a military alliance to deal with Russiaok so let me reframe this
- russia is scared of NATO
- so they lie about nazis and invade a country
- things dont go very well
- financial sanctions cripple russian
- russia blames it on america
im not buying lasarovs logic at all
they didnt have to invade ukraine and murder men, women, and children. but they did. and now their country is suffering, which makes them less of a threat
Dissidents you say? Where's Edward Snowden right now?the main issue is that russia is run by a dictator that kills people who dissent
That's a really funny thing to read.Well, yes, America did in fact fund the Nazis. Congress tried not to fund the Nazis but then they realized there was no way to fund the rest of the Ukrainian Government without funding the Nazis, so they just funded them anyway.
But that is really a minor issue in all of this.
are you arguing just to argue. i was obiously referring to russian dissidents.Dissidents you say? Where's Edward Snowden right now?
Good article... except for the fact that the convoy has been stopped for over a day, and now we have <Alex Jones Voice> THE DOCUMENTS!![]()
Putin is NOT crazy, the Russian invasion is NOT failing: BILL ROGGIO
ROGGIO: Believing Russia's assault is going poorly may make us feel better but is at odds with the facts. We cannot help Ukraine if we cannot be honest about its predicament.www.dailymail.co.uk
You’ll appreciate this.What happened to the 70km long convoy headed to Kiev?
Everyone in foreign policy is aware that certain things cause certain reactions. To us, they don't necessarily seem "obvious" because we aren't the type of psychopaths who want to have their thumbs on the scale of the world. This tweet might point you in the right direction:
View: https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1494809960286507009
I get annoyed with people saying "Well, Putin is a *insert thing every leader does*!!!" as if that's supposed to be a reason to start a war.are you arguing just to argue. i was obiously referring to russian dissidents.
ps. fuck america. snowden is a hero
Great post- when did it become acceptable to mispronounce "nuclear"?
Is this a serious post?Lol at Russia worrying that Ukraine joining NATO would cause a civil war or a split amongst the ethnic Russian populace so Russia was so worried they went ahead and help a civil war and a split with the ethnic Russian population... As they've done in three other frozen conflicts.
I don't think Russia's worry about Ukraine joining NATO is about destabilizing the neighborhood given their willingness to repeatedly make that "worry" happen.
sweet christ pulling babies from incubators, try and keep up.