M
member 1013
Guest
My IQ is over 93!
if you put it on video and publish, it most certainly is.
M
member 1013
Guest
I agree with publishing but maybe it was recorded as record keeping, sent to da gubmint and someone there leaked it.
I have seen published videos of NATO troops roughly moving bodies and piling them, I’m not trying for a “whatabout” argument I’m just saying I believe it is just a standard reality of war considered “within bounds.”
the obligation under Geneva Convention is to protect all killed from "ill treatment", inasmuch as military considerations allow.
that is definitely "ill treatment" outside of the considerations of military necessity.
M
member 1013
Guest
Pulling it off the tank it’s twisted around?
NATO troops would NEVER commit war crimes.
M
member 1013
Guest
But is it actually a war crime to move bodies roughly, especially under the conditions of a war zone?
No idea, but saying "Well NATO does it." isn't exactly a great example of why something is okay.
M
member 1013
Guest
Nato does it and publishes it freely because no one considers it a warcrime
there's no reason to record it.
this isn't normal corpse removal, as is necessary for health reasons.
M
member 1013
Guest
What was happening then? They were talking about how tragic it was he got sent from Asia to Ukraine to die and struggling to handle the body because they thought roping it would work lulz
or NATO does it freely because western countries don't really give a fuck when it's them committing the war crimes.
M
member 1013
Guest
I just googled and found a bunch of NATO soldiers charged and convicted so…
So it is a war crime?
M
member 1013
Guest
No not for that
Oh, so the ones that garnish public outrage like that broad from Abu Graib? or the 2 Canucks that got the Airborne disbanded?
Me too.
Hugs
I decided to Google the actual list of U.N. war crimes. It might be the greatest piece of comedy ever written:
United Nations Office on Genocide Prevention and the Responsibility to Protect
Genocide Prevention and the Responsibility to Protect
www.un.org
D
Deleted member 1
Guest
Tell us you're in Azov without telling us you're in Azov.
D
Deleted member 1
Guest
You'd have a hard time calling that desecrating the corpse.
As for releasing pictures of the dead, the history of it is quite murky with only people who are posing or other acts meant to humiliate typically being charged. The whole point is that picture arent meant to be intimidating or humiliating to the dead person/family/side in the war.
This comes every so often when we choose to release or not release a picture of a dead terrorist or whatever...
Is It Legal For The U.S. To Release Pictures Of Bin Laden's Body?
In the past, the U.S. has said releasing photos of the dead is in line with international law. One legal expert says the release of the bin Laden pictures may be in a legal gray area.
www.npr.org
Anyways the guys in the video moved a body while stating...
"Hes like rinced meat"
"Another asian... another Buryat"
"He didn't need that. Why did he have to come here, so far to our side to die."
"It's horrible."
Dudes are reverant and saddened they had to kill him while doing the dirty work of investigating the wreckage.
As long as they didn't do more after the cameras roll, I'd challenge you to find a court case where such similar actions lead to prosecution.
the actual wording isn't "desecrating"....but showing his ID and allowing people to video the removal of the body is a violation.You'd have a hard time calling that desecrating the corpse.
As for releasing pictures of the dead, the history of it is quite murky with only people who are posing or other acts meant to humiliate typically being charged. The whole point is that picture arent meant to be intimidating or humiliating to the dead person/family/side in the war.
This comes every so often when we choose to release or not release a picture of a dead terrorist or whatever...
Is It Legal For The U.S. To Release Pictures Of Bin Laden's Body?
In the past, the U.S. has said releasing photos of the dead is in line with international law. One legal expert says the release of the bin Laden pictures may be in a legal gray area.
Anyways the guys in the video moved a body while stating...
"Hes like rinced meat"
"Another asian... another Buryat"
"He didn't need that. Why did he have to come here, so far to our side to die."
"It's horrible."
Dudes are reverant and saddened they had to kill him while doing the dirty work of investigating the wreckage.
As long as they didn't do more after the cameras roll, I'd challenge you to find a court case where such similar actions lead to prosecution.
i'm not saying they're getting charged with anything.