But they did, remember which team opposed it a billion to zero.
Name a country that's perfect in human history.
And what's your theory on that?
Gun violence?
What are the 3 main causes of mortality, and what could the same government touting "gun control" do to curb those issues, and why haven't they?
In the "western world"?
Care to elaborate on who's included in "the western world" and what metrics are used for the word "poverty"?
America's homeless addicts-by-design make more money on the freeway corners than 90% of the planet with the option to eat like the kings of old couldn't.
I think you need a hundred-year history lesson on the etymology and actionable consequences of "healthcare".
I guess the last 2 weren't obvious enough.
BTW, it is nationalized, for the 90+%, you might look into that with the keywords "medicare", "medicaid", the "VA", then scroll through proxies, subsidiaries & bureaucracy.
"They" should've never federalized it, America is a republic. Maybe you should actually read the constitution you cited with a fresh set of eyeballs.
It's "they" who broke established precedent with the passage of R V Wade in the first place, based on emotion, a lobby that eclipses the NRA, an agenda and bald-faced lies.
View:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufi6QUKe2Tg
I find it ironic you cite American society as broken without having a clue you propagate the root causes of its decay.
Protection of the unborn is the core of moral decline; anyone who doesn't grasp this serves only an agenda that calls them "useful idiots", virtue-signaling regarding the gun "debate" as well as most others along a party line.
I'd search high-IQ individuals and watch them debate on it with the core arguments being 'war' and 'population control'.
Yeah, it's one of the core principals the country was founded on, why hundreds of millions have(and do) flock(ed) here over centuries across oceans the diameter of the moon avoiding persecution, and arguably the glue that holds the experiment together.
Where's the inclusion?
Amazingly the citation of military strength and its implications are completely missed in this base argument.
World powers use mutually assured destruction as a premise for stability, but apparently not for the individual?
A career in penology might suit you. Or just have a chat with 10 prison guards who've spent more than 10 years in the system.
It's a terrible and tragic societal problem, but that's only because all the wrong people are incarcerated.
It's the orchestrators who belong there, most of the people who help form your opinions on that rectangular device in the living room.
Again, the root cause alludes you.
Not even close to close.
The highest rate of murder belongs SOLELY to the governments of the world.
Individuals don't even have the capacity to kill on the scope of governments to their own people as well as abroad.
You like many here are stuck in a box.
If studying is too time-consuming take a mushroom or DMT trip, and before you begin, write the golden rule on a piece of paper in front of you.
Recall that "everything I needed to know I learned in kindergarten", then look around at ANY government and ask yourself if they're abiding by that principal.
Do Gavin Newsome, Lori Lightfoot, Bill DeBlasio, Jacinda Arden, Bill Gates, George Soros, Joe Biden, Klaus Schwab, Tedros Ghebreyesus, Emmanuel Macron, Jinping Xi and Justin Trudeau look like they're treating us like they want to be treated?
en.m.wikipedia.org
@Hauler*
