Style is the main reason. .......It's very unlikely Frankie beats Conor, hate is the reason a lot think he will.
Frankie is the opposite of "stuck in the mud".
This goes several rounds......
Style is the main reason. .......It's very unlikely Frankie beats Conor, hate is the reason a lot think he will.
Those just absolutely closed the case against you. In MMA a fighter on his back is in an inferior position from the fighter on top of him (unless said fighter is Werdum) and that was absolutely a set technique Conor used.I am not wrong though guys. he was not swept. just because you fan boys think it was a sweep doesnt mean it was.
dozens of experts thought Conor was going to win the fight. were they right?
definitions
sweep:
"A sweep, when referred to in the context of ground fighting is a technique used to transition from a neutral or inferior position to a dominant position, such as a practitioner moving from in an opponent's guard to full mount, hence the alternative term 'reversal' as the dominance of positions have been reversed."
scramble:
"scrambling ability is the ability to push off your feet to defend or escape without a set technique in mind"
I'm just joking around trying to be funnier than i really am.I've never seen you try to gif your way out of a debate, hence awesome gif game.
I tend to agree with that assessment.Style is the main reason. .......
Frankie is the opposite of "stuck in the mud".
This goes several rounds......
I know this.Style is the main reason. .......
Frankie is the opposite of "stuck in the mud".
This goes several rounds......
that's like... 80% of my game.I'm just joking around trying to be funnier than i really am.
how am I to debate your nonsense? because thats what you bring to the table.I've never seen you try to gif your way out of a debate, hence awesome gif game.
Now you are throwing words around to discredit us. You just like discrediting people, right? Makes you look to be in the right, hm?I am not wrong though guys. he was not swept. just because you fan boys think it was a sweep doesnt mean it was.
Prediction = Analysis?! ?! ?! ?!dozens of experts thought Conor was going to win the fight. were they right?
lol, no it wasnt man. I didnt know he could set up those techniques with not even a second to prepare to mentally gage whats happening but cant seem to know what to do in the event of a RNC.Those just absolutely closed the case against you. In MMA a fighter on his back is in an inferior position from the fighter on top of him (unless said fighter is Werdum) and that was absolutely a set technique Conor used.
If you don't know you're backing my point. LOL.how am I to debate your nonsense? because thats what you bring to the table.
"Mendes has a much better double than Frankie, much better. Frankies wrestling style is a lot closer to the Eastern European style Conor trains, there is plenty of clues Conor will handle Frankie easier than Chad."
that shit is nonsense. pure nonsense. how you even quantify that is beyond me. please try as I would love to know your reasoning.
"Ye I'm new but unlike a lot of you, this isn't the only sport I understand, I've probably played more sports than a lot of you have watched and that's not getting into what I've watched. Oh ye I have several qualifications in sport and excercise, including coaching tickets for two sports which are vastly more mechanically complicated than any element of MMA except BJJ. But ye sit on your high horse cause you have more watched fights under your belt."
so getting into a pissing contest with some noob on how much sports you watch is going to make this debate any better or more engaging? should I be coming back with how many sports I watch?
tell me, what in that mess of text you call an "argument" would you call meaningful?
the gif response was the only response to that useless post.
Common misconception similar to irregardless. Qualify homie, qualify.how you even quantify that is beyond me.
Also, what i'm doing right here is what i was referring to earlier by the multiquote option. It just makes it easier for others to quote you. Etiquette and all.the gif response was the only response to that useless post.
I may not "do bjj", but i spent several years practicing US Army hand to hand combat techniques. I'd be willing to roll with any blue belt on the planet. I doubt i'd completely suck at it. I'd probably get tapped as well. I don't see the point in this.okay, sorry guys, my bad, I didnt know I was dealing with a bunch of experts on here.
a tuf 20 noob and a few guys who dont even do BJJ.
have a great day stroking each others cocks over Conors epic "sweep."
Frankie by whatever he wants. Conor has ZERO game for Frankie.
Dear Lord, i hope no one confuses any of my ADHD ramblings for me being upset at any given point. I love a healthy debate, and just happen to be in the mood for one today. If i came off that way i do apologize.
I am not in any way upset with any of your guys either. fyi.Dear Lord, i hope no one confuses any of my ADHD ramblings for me being upset at any given point. I love a healthy debate, and just happen to be in the mood for one today. If i came off that way i do apologize.
No bickering intended from me homie. If i'm bothering people that was not my purpose. My b yo.Nah....I just hate to see everyone bickering.
It's unhealthy.
is there a point to any of this? like really?!I may not "do bjj", but i spent several years practicing US Army hand to hand combat techniques. I'd be willing to roll with any blue belt on the planet. I doubt i'd completely suck at it. I'd probably get tapped as well. I don't see the point in this.
I didn't get that impression. For you, that was pretty tame.I am not in any way upset with any of your guys either. fyi.
thanks? hahaha.I didn't get that impression. For you, that was pretty tame.
guarenteed you tap me too. the difference is I am not running around calling your scramble a sweepI may not "do bjj", but i spent several years practicing US Army hand to hand combat techniques. I'd be willing to roll with any blue belt on the planet. I doubt i'd completely suck at it. I'd probably get tapped as well.
I think it could go either way, but that's why it intrigues me so damn much. For example, I knew within my heart of hearts Jacare would tap Camozzi. That matchup bored me. And it ended up being this:guarenteed you tap me too. the difference is I am not running around calling your scramble a sweep
either way, whatever you believe, we all agree that Frankie-two-times, is going to beat Conor-two-taps right? RIGHT?!