I won't impede his banging, I'm just trying to figure out what he's banging.Let him bang bro
He's Ukrainian. Language barrier and all that.I won't impede his banging, I'm just trying to figure out what he's banging.
One day it will all become clearI won't impede his banging, I'm just trying to figure out what he's banging.
The first thing USADA will do is buy the product themselves and test it. Really hard to prove a tainted supplement, but it's possible.Will Jon Jones send self tainted (if that is a real descriptive term?) samples to the lab and publicly present the results to "prove" he took legal supplements?
Will the supplement then come after him for false claims, etc?
Where is this going I wonder?
Exactly. You send them your supplements for testing and they purchase the same supplements on their own for testing and then compare. If both contain off label substances then you'll get a slap on the wrist. If not, enjoy your two years on the bench.The first thing USADA will do is buy the product themselves and test it. Really hard to prove a tainted supplement, but it's possible.
Happened with Yoel RomeroThe first thing USADA will do is buy the product themselves and test it. Really hard to prove a tainted supplement, but it's possible.
Yep, but I think his situation will prove to be rare.Happened with Yoel Romero
Eventually.Yep, but I think his situation will prove to be rare.
And the scary thing is, even if Jones' supplement was tainted, who's to say that every batch of that stuff is tainted? Jones could have bought his in January and they have since cleaned the machines or stopped making the supplement that tainted Jones' batch. It just seems crazy inexact.Exactly. You send them your supplements for testing and they purchase the same supplements on their own for testing and then compare. If both contain off label substances then you'll get a slap on the wrist. If not, enjoy your two years on the bench.
You would think so, but I think supplements by definition are not held to the same standard as FDA approved medicines and all of that, so there may be a bit of inherent risk that the user has to take on.Eventually.
I wonder if an athlete would have any legal recourse against a supplement company if it was producing items and not listing or even providing a disclaimer stating that it may contain chemicals banned by WADA?
I think if a guy like Yoel Romero or Tim Means got a lawyer that could prove that taking Supplement Company X's product resulted in significant financial loss for the fighter, and the reason for it was due to X's negligence in not listing all the ingredients on the label, it would be a pretty easy case.You would think so, but I think supplements by definition are not held to the same standard as FDA approved medicines and all of that, so there may be a bit of inherent risk that the user has to take on.
Yeah neither am I.I think if a guy like Yoel Romero or Tim Means got a lawyer that could prove that taking Supplement Company X's product resulted in significant financial loss for the fighter, and the reason for it was due to X's negligence in not listing all the ingredients on the label, it would be a pretty easy case.
But I'm not a civil lawyer so idk.
I make a twitter account. Ask Jon why we should belive, my account immediately suspended and all other people tweets too except ones blow smoke in his ass ok.I won't impede his banging, I'm just trying to figure out what he's banging.
Ah, I get what you're saying now.I make a twitter account. Ask Jon why we should belive, my account immediately suspended and all other people tweets too except ones blow smoke in his ass ok.
You are correct. You are not an Attorney. Supplements are not regulated by the FDA. So, he doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of successfully suing them.Yeah neither am I.
I bet it depends on what is on the label. These companies do everything possible to not get sued.
I'm having a hard time understanding your snarkiness here. You were agreeing with me. Did you think that this was a snazzy way to make a point or something?You are correct. You are not an Attorney.
^ Basically what you said here but without the bravado and unapologetic self-assuredness.You would think so, but I think supplements by definition are not held to the same standard as FDA approved medicines and all of that, so there may be a bit of inherent risk that the user has to take on.
No Bravado at all. So many here are far too sensitive. My lord in heaven...I'm having a hard time understanding your snarkiness here. You were agreeing with me. Did you think that this was a snazzy way to make a point or something?
^ Basically what you said here but without the bravado and unapologetic self-assuredness.