Race discussion with Big.Thirsty

Leigh said:
So what race is this person?

rachelle-lefevre-curly-hair.jpg
Click to expand...
With her red hair blue eyes pale skin wide brow and thick nose I'm gonna say Neanderthal
 
Kirk said:
Yep and this is written text

6TS7w5a.jpg


BTW I like how they narrowed down the age a 15 year tolerance or 37.5% of the upper end of their prediction
Click to expand...
The good stuff starts on page 8. These were just my shitposts. I gave up after nobody refuted my FBI articles.
 
Kirk said:
Its because the FBI arent really a trusted source, lets see something in a peer reviewed medical or other scientific journal broseph
Click to expand...
I get where you're coming from. And I'm seeing now where the skeletal science is disputed.

But in this article that uses genetic science to refute (Human family tree drawn by gene sequencing effort), they're confirming identifiable genetic variations that exist between "regions of human population." So which is it? We can identify someone's "region of origin" forensically by DNA or not?

maplegend_600w.jpg
 
IschKabibble said:
I get where you're coming from. And I'm seeing now where the skeletal science is disputed.

But in this article that uses genetic science to refute (Human family tree drawn by gene sequencing effort), they're confirming identifiable genetic variations that exist between "regions of human population." So which is it? We can identify someone's "region of origin" forensically by DNA or not?

maplegend_600w.jpg
Click to expand...


I reckon we are close to being able to do that BUT in doing so will knock the Negro/Caucasian/Mongoloid classifications out of existence

We will eventually be able to identify whether an african comes from modern day south africa or the congo, both are negro so then what? Are we simply proving that humans originate from different geographical locations? Will each isolated group then become their own race?

EG I reckon Tasmanian Aboriginals (too bad whitey killed them all) would have been just as susceptible to skin cell mutation or melanoma as a northern eurpoean well at least much more so than an aboriginal who's people came from the Northern end of Australia. Are they both part of the Australian aboriginal race?

Thats a shitty example but you get what Im saying eh?
 
Kirk said:
I reckon we are close to being able to do that BUT in doing so will knock the Negro/Caucasian/Mongoloid classifications out of existence

We will eventually be able to identify whether an african comes from modern day south africa or the congo, both are negro so then what? Are we simply proving that humans originate from different geographical locations? Will each isolated group then become their own race?

EG I reckon Tasmanian Aboriginals (too bad whitey killed them all) would have been just as susceptible to skin cell mutation or melanoma as a northern eurpoean well at least much more so than an aboriginal who's people came from the Northern end of Australia. Are they both part of the Australian aboriginal race?

Thats a shitty example but you get what Im saying eh?
Click to expand...
Personally, I don't care what word we use to describe the geographic subgroups of our species. But you'll have to consult with @Song2 to see if the Mexicans are okay with giving up "La Raza."
 
IschKabibble said:
Personally, I don't care what word we use to describe the geographic subgroups of our species. But you'll have to consult with @Song2 to see if the Mexicans are okay with giving up "La Raza."
Click to expand...

Well its plainly obvious that two Japanese are more closely related than a Japanese and a Frenchman

There's also the issue with finding replacement organs for biracial folk like me and worse still my kids

A IndoFijian/Korean ethnic person's body will reject virtually all and any donor organs due to.....genetics 🙁


Adult stem cell research will put an end to that though.


All Im saying is that the established racial categories dont exist and never have, we all have negro in us for example, Robbie Hart about 3 feet of negro
 
Kirk said:
Well its plainly obvious that two Japanese are more closely related than a Japanese and a Frenchman

There's also the issue with finding replacement organs for biracial folk like me and worse still my kids

A IndoFijian/Korean ethnic person's body will reject virtually all and any donor organs due to.....genetics 🙁


Adult stem cell research will put an end to that though.


All Im saying is that the established racial categories dont exist and never have, we all have negro in us for example, Robbie Hart about 3 feet of negro
Click to expand...
Fear not friend. The future is bright.

 
IschKabibble said:
Personally, I don't care what word we use to describe the geographic subgroups of our species. But you'll have to consult with @Song2 to see if the Mexicans are okay with giving up "La Raza."
Click to expand...
I don't care what you mayos call us.


Just stay away from our women. (That applies to Latino and white women)



Also I'm too lazy to read this thread but I must disagree



I guess
 
IschKabibble said:
I get where you're coming from. And I'm seeing now where the skeletal science is disputed.

But in this article that uses genetic science to refute (Human family tree drawn by gene sequencing effort), they're confirming identifiable genetic variations that exist between "regions of human population." So which is it? We can identify someone's "region of origin" forensically by DNA or not?

maplegend_600w.jpg
Click to expand...
We can identify someone's region of origin genetically but, as explained, because they share genes with some other people from that area. They may be European but it doesn't mean all Europeans share those genes. The designations of European, African etc are still genetically arbitrary.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top