M
member 1013
Guest
With her red hair blue eyes pale skin wide brow and thick nose I'm gonna say NeanderthalSo what race is this person?
Race discussion with Big.Thirsty
- Thread starter Leigh
- Start date
"of African American decent" LOLOLOLAnd I depart this thread with one final shitpost...
"Caucasian decent"...
CAUCASIANS!
Generally its white people with their flu and smallpox that render other races extinct
BUT were gonna get you guys back with the bad aids HAHAHAHA!
1
1031
Guest
^ The Afghane has that look in his eye, Joe.
-Kenny Florian
-Kenny Florian
That's a cartoon.CAUCASIANS!
Yep and this is written text
BTW I like how they narrowed down the age a 15 year tolerance or 37.5% of the upper end of their prediction
The good stuff starts on page 8. These were just my shitposts. I gave up after nobody refuted my FBI articles.Yep and this is written text
BTW I like how they narrowed down the age a 15 year tolerance or 37.5% of the upper end of their prediction
Its because the FBI arent really a trusted source, lets see something in a peer reviewed medical or other scientific journal broseph
blank is sooooooo
going to question you about your hidden meaning behind those skeletons........And I depart this thread with one final shitpost...
I get where you're coming from. And I'm seeing now where the skeletal science is disputed.
But in this article that uses genetic science to refute (Human family tree drawn by gene sequencing effort), they're confirming identifiable genetic variations that exist between "regions of human population." So which is it? We can identify someone's "region of origin" forensically by DNA or not?
Indians put the 'indo' in Indo-European!
Nordic ginger shellfish gatherer stock.
I get where you're coming from. And I'm seeing now where the skeletal science is disputed.
But in this article that uses genetic science to refute (Human family tree drawn by gene sequencing effort), they're confirming identifiable genetic variations that exist between "regions of human population." So which is it? We can identify someone's "region of origin" forensically by DNA or not?
I reckon we are close to being able to do that BUT in doing so will knock the Negro/Caucasian/Mongoloid classifications out of existence
We will eventually be able to identify whether an african comes from modern day south africa or the congo, both are negro so then what? Are we simply proving that humans originate from different geographical locations? Will each isolated group then become their own race?
EG I reckon Tasmanian Aboriginals (too bad whitey killed them all) would have been just as susceptible to skin cell mutation or melanoma as a northern eurpoean well at least much more so than an aboriginal who's people came from the Northern end of Australia. Are they both part of the Australian aboriginal race?
Thats a shitty example but you get what Im saying eh?
Personally, I don't care what word we use to describe the geographic subgroups of our species. But you'll have to consult with @Song2 to see if the Mexicans are okay with giving up "La Raza."
Nordic shellfish gatherer. Altruistic, sexually promiscuous. yet infertile. Digs African men. Believes race is a social construct.So what race is this person?
Well its plainly obvious that two Japanese are more closely related than a Japanese and a Frenchman
There's also the issue with finding replacement organs for biracial folk like me and worse still my kids
A IndoFijian/Korean ethnic person's body will reject virtually all and any donor organs due to.....genetics
Adult stem cell research will put an end to that though.
All Im saying is that the established racial categories dont exist and never have, we all have negro in us for example, Robbie Hart about 3 feet of negro
Fear not friend. The future is bright.Well its plainly obvious that two Japanese are more closely related than a Japanese and a Frenchman
There's also the issue with finding replacement organs for biracial folk like me and worse still my kids
A IndoFijian/Korean ethnic person's body will reject virtually all and any donor organs due to.....genetics
Adult stem cell research will put an end to that though.
All Im saying is that the established racial categories dont exist and never have, we all have negro in us for example, Robbie Hart about 3 feet of negro
I don't care what you mayos call us.
Just stay away from our women. (That applies to Latino and white women)
Also I'm too lazy to read this thread but I must disagree
I guess
Mine are organic designer babies, I wanted them to have the athleticism and sense of honor of the Fijian and the shrewdness of the Indian.
The Korean was just cause I needed to blow in something.
That doesnt sound right huh?
We can identify someone's region of origin genetically but, as explained, because they share genes with some other people from that area. They may be European but it doesn't mean all Europeans share those genes. The designations of European, African etc are still genetically arbitrary.I get where you're coming from. And I'm seeing now where the skeletal science is disputed.
But in this article that uses genetic science to refute (Human family tree drawn by gene sequencing effort), they're confirming identifiable genetic variations that exist between "regions of human population." So which is it? We can identify someone's "region of origin" forensically by DNA or not?
The stuff you presented was interesting and I wanted to read up on it before discussing further.
1
1372
Guest
