Can't let it go. Too stubborn.Youve been hinting at that for the last 32 pages broseph
Can't let it go. Too stubborn.Youve been hinting at that for the last 32 pages broseph
You can't just say "that's not proof." That's not how this works. I'm only here to apply sound logic.
I don't give a fuck for the conversation. This is to sharpen Leigh's mind a bit. Because I remember reading that this is an issue for him that spans multiple years and multiple forums. That's ridiculous. How much longer will we struggle to be objective about race as it applies to our history?
Is race a social construct? Yes.
Is it just a social construct? No.
I have proven that irrefutably in this thread.
I remain unconvinced, and see no proof.I should have left on page one.
Of course it's all good, but the argument was proven false and nobody wants to admit it.I remain unconvinced, and see no proof.
Also, why are you getting worked up over this?
It really is all good homie.
I have not witnessed that stance proven wrong.Of course it's all good, but the argument was proven false and nobody wants to admit it.
If not race, and you had to call it something, what would you call it?
He would laugh at the context of the argument and make a joke out of it.I liked George, but he was wrong on a great many things.
I don't idolize him in the same fashion. He was funny for the most part though.He would laugh at the notion of this context and make a joke out of it.
That's the point.
He gave his opinions just like anyone else, only he was much funnier than most about it. This is also tangential.He'd probably also laugh at your assertion that he was "wrong on a great many things."
Why do you think he's so popular? He told the truth when it hurt most. That's his whole gimmick!
I don't focus on appearance, I implied that YOU are, after talking about skull size and facial soft tissue, as well as talking about Chinese women who look Welsh.So you focus on appearance and call me ignorant? That's why your side of the argument is inherently racist.
Nobody refuted the immune system differences I pointed out here. How are you going to ignore that as biological separation of a peoples?
I promise I'm not the one being ignorant here.
Fwiw I agree with you.You can't just say "that's not proof." That's not how this works. I'm only here to apply sound logic.
I don't give a fuck for the conversation. This is to sharpen Leigh's mind a bit. Because I remember reading that this is an issue for him that spans multiple years and multiple forums. That's ridiculous. How much longer will we struggle to be objective about race as it applies to our history?
Is race a social construct? Yes.
Is it just a social construct? No.
I have proven that irrefutably in this thread.
So we agree you called me racist by indirect implication for focusing on one false aspect of the argument.I don't focus on appearance, I implied that YOU are, after talking about skull size and facial soft tissue, as well as talking about Chinese women who look Welsh.
Okay. More science. Good. The statistical probability that they (a race) will die upon integration with modern society (another race) is greater than not. Prove this incorrect.Do ALL sentalise have the same immune system adaptions? Does nobody else have the same adaptions?
Pack a lunch homie.Fwiw I agree with you.
Meaning you're most definitely on the right side of the argument.
I'm busy lounging right now but you can tag me in to take on these jamokes when I get my re-up of adderall in a few days.
Hold on to your butts.
Fwiw I agree with you.
Meaning you're most definitely on the right side of the argument.
I'm busy lounging right now but you can tag me in to take on these jamokes when I get my re-up of adderall in a few days.
Hold on to your butts.
No, saying someone seems focused on appearance in reference to their stance does not equal calling them a racist.So we agree you called me racist by indirect implication for focusing on one false aspect of the argument.
Okay. More science. Good. The statistical probability that they (a race) will die upon integration with modern society (another race) is greater than not. Prove this incorrect.
I didn't call you anything. You mentioned appearance, I've highlighted that. If you think that's racist, well that's up to you.So we agree you called me racist by indirect implication for focusing on one false aspect of the argument.
A probability based on average does not prove definitive limits.Okay. More science. Good. The statistical probability that they (a race) will die upon integration with modern society (another race) is greater than not. Prove this incorrect.
Nothing to do with this thread but while you're here what do you think about having a horror movie villain Grand Prix in October? Ya know in honor of Halloween n shit.I don't focus on appearance, I implied that YOU are, after talking about skull size and facial soft tissue, as well as talking about Chinese women who look Welsh.
Do ALL sentalise have the same immune system adaptions? Does nobody else have the same adaptions?
Nothing to do with this thread but while you're here what do you think about having a horror movie villain Grand Prix in October? Ya know in honor of Halloween n shit.
Can I get a hell yeah?!!
You will not win via attrition, i can tell you that much.Page 100 here we come?
Or is @Leigh going to admit he was wrong and promote me to mod. Have I at least not proven my ability to stay objective and impartial in this thread?
I'm not trying to win on the basis of attrition. I'm trying to win on the basis of logic.You will not win via attrition, i can tell you that much.
Remind me in October and we'll look to have the final on October 31st. Great shoutNothing to do with this thread but while you're here what do you think about having a horror movie villain Grand Prix in October? Ya know in honor of Halloween n shit.
Can I get a hell yeah?!!