Matt Hughes sees 'no need' for a fighter's union

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up
1

1031

Guest
He has a point in a way but the company is making A LOT of money of the backs of fighters while sharing as little as possible, or so it seems.
A fighter's union may not be needed but fair compensation is.
Think of what the UFC would be if talented fighters stopped fighting for them and just did something else. That's a company that would still exist but lose all its prestige.
 

KWingJitsu

ยาเม็ดสีแดงหรือสีฟ้ายา?
Nov 15, 2015
10,311
12,689
Shocked that company man, Matt Hughes, who was gifted an exec job after retirement, would suggest a union isn't necessary.
Beat me to it.
He's just making sire the new owners keep him on that company gravy train.
 

Kingtony87

Batman
Feb 2, 2016
6,523
8,900
A lot of hate going on for an absolute legend in here just because he's not on board with the anti ufc train. If this was Jones getting talked about in here like this ndnh would be in here reporting all of you.
 

Mad Dog

First 100
First 100
Jan 14, 2015
1,265
1,678
Hughes position is pretty predictable. He was always taken care of by the UFC and even now he has a nice job working for them. There's no way he will publicly take a position that is counter to the UFC view.
 
M

member 3289

Guest
If this was Jones getting talked about in here like this ndnh would be in here reporting all of you.
I saw a few posts that were definitely fighter bashing but I chose to ignore rather than report them. Yes that makes me a hypocrite but I don't really care.
 

Kingtony87

Batman
Feb 2, 2016
6,523
8,900
I saw a few posts that were definitely fighter bashing but I chose to ignore rather than report them. Yes that makes me a hypocrite but I don't really care.
Well considering Wild @Wild is posting in here you'd think he'd be consistent and be on top of it. i mean i did get a post changed for calling someone a child.
 
P

Punch

Guest
I saw a few posts that were definitely fighter bashing but I chose to ignore rather than report them. Yes that makes me a hypocrite but I don't really care.
Really? I only saw one that at first glace seemed that way. Reread it though, and i could see the argument for either way.
 

Wild

Zi Nazi
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
88,226
127,277
I dont see any real fighter bashing in here, besides the insinuation that Hughes is a tool...which is kinda hard to argue, no?
 

Kingtony87

Batman
Feb 2, 2016
6,523
8,900
I dont see any real fighter bashing in here, besides the insinuation that Hughes is a tool...which is kinda hard to argue, no?
Hughes has always been a douche. Great fighter, but a dickwad and the only man on Earth to be someone'sbitch while making his master ride bitch.



Your ug modding bias is showing.

If i got a post edited for calling someone a child this is fucking ludacris.
 

Leigh

Engineer
Pro Fighter
Jan 26, 2015
10,925
21,023
Guys, please cut back on the bashing. If you think Matt is a tool, that's fine but you can make your point without name calling.

The anecdote about him starting trouble at parties is interesting and informative but it speaks for itself and doesn't need insults thrown in on top.

Cheers
 

Wild

Zi Nazi
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
88,226
127,277
Hughes has always been a douche. Great fighter, but a dickwad and the only man on Earth to be someone'sbitch while making his master ride bitch.



Your ug modding bias is showing.

If i got a post edited for calling someone a child this is fucking ludacris.


Let's not take this too serious guys. No one in here called Matt anything more than a tool, which let's be honest...he's been known to act like one on many occasions. If people were calling him a bitch, faggot, cunt, pussy, etc....I'd moderate it because it sets a bad precedent. I don't think anyone would argue anything in this thread however. I get your frustration that you might have said something that was edited or whatever in another thread, but moderating is always going to be subjective and it's never going to be perfect. All we (I) can do is our best. But "well I was modded for this and so & so wasn't, so that gives me the right to do XYZ" isn't really productive IMO.
 

Kingtony87

Batman
Feb 2, 2016
6,523
8,900


Let's not take this too serious guys. No one in here called Matt anything more than a tool, which let's be honest...he's been known to act like one on many occasions. If people were calling him a bitch, faggot, cunt, pussy, etc....I'd moderate it because it sets a bad precedent. I don't think anyone would argue anything in this thread however. I get your frustration that you might have said something that was edited or whatever in another thread, but moderating is always going to be subjective and it's never going to be perfect. All we (I) can do is our best. But "well I was modded for this and so & so wasn't, so that gives me the right to do XYZ" isn't really productive IMO.
The very post i quoted on the first page called him both a douche and a bitch......