General Corona virus updates

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up

SoupCan

how bout dat
First 100
Jan 18, 2015
2,662
3,195
Guys, take a minute and think about the time we complete the alphabet on the toilet ground.

We need that kinda unity, now more than ever

ABCTT 4 lyfe
 

sparkuri

Pulse On The Finger Of The Community
First 100
Jan 16, 2015
34,644
46,720



Looks like Romania is trying the "no shit sherlock" approach.
 

Wild

Zi Nazi
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
85,197
123,574
CDC Director Admits Agency Gave False Information on COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Monitoring


In May, CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky admitted that the agency had “underperformed” and vowed to “rebuild public trust.” Those efforts took a big hit on Tuesday when the agency admitted they shared false information to the public regarding COVID vaccine safety monitoring.

The director made the startling admission in a written statement made public on Monday.

According to the Epoch Times, the statement acknowledges that the CDC “did not analyze certain types of adverse event reports at all in 2021, despite the agency previously saying it started in February 2021.”

An excerpt from the statement from Dr. Walensky reads:

“CDC performed PRR analysis between March 25, 2022, through July 31, 2022. CDC also recently addressed a previous statement made to the Epoch Times to clarify PRR were not run between February 26, 2021, to September 30, 2021.

Walensky’s admission stands in stark contrast to repeated promises to perform regular analysis of reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

In June, the CDC announced they did not perform analysis of reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (so-called PRRs), noting that such reviews were “outside th[e] agency’s purview.”

CDC Director Admits Agency Gave False Information on COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Monitoring: Report (resistthemainstream.org)
 

Hauler

Been fallin so long it's like gravitys gone
Feb 3, 2016
45,614
57,955
I actually saw a commercial the other day that addressed co-morbidity issues. Basically saying you were at more of a risk if you have heart issues, high blood pressure, obese, etc. I'm pretty sure it was a CDC commercial.

2 years in.

My guess is they are worried about coming under fire for not advertising that information in order to make their fear porn more effective by scaring as many people as possible to get the jab.

You could find that info before if you looked for it.
But it wasn't shouted from the rooftops like the "just get the jab" message was.
 

sparkuri

Pulse On The Finger Of The Community
First 100
Jan 16, 2015
34,644
46,720
I actually saw a commercial the other day that addressed co-morbidity issues. Basically saying you were at more of a risk if you have heart issues, high blood pressure, obese, etc. I'm pretty sure it was a CDC commercial.

2 years in.

My guess is they are worried about coming under fire for not advertising that information in order to make their fear porn more effective by scaring as many people as possible to get the jab.

You could find that info before if you looked for it.
But it wasn't shouted from the rooftops like the "just get the jab" message was.
Pre-positioning for the 'Trump rushed the jab & killed millions but we're still benevolent & relevant' campaign cycle.