lars hasn't called me that though
He don't want this lebanese heat
lars hasn't called me that though
I was trying to be generous.There are 3 of you?
when you stated that only 3 people don't think I am a moron here you were being passive aggressiveWhat exactly was passive aggressive? You posted an article that looked good at first glance. After a few paragraphs it starts to become suspect, then you say "Who is this guy?" and realize he's a snake oil salesman. I suggested if you want to be taken seriously you not post "science" articles from people who are what can only be denied as science deniers. Then you come back at me with some "Better wait for you vaccine, bro." nonsense and a Bill Gates video. All you've done around here in recent weeks has been troll, accuse others of trolling , and sulk. I don't know what's wrong with you, but you're better than this.
Was it because you were saying antisemitic things?I wouldn't worry
He already showed his cards by calling me an antisemite twice
So I had lowered expectations for that poster
I’ll be the judgifier of thatWas it because you were saying antisemitic things?
Absolutely not.Was it because you were saying antisemitic things?
You apparently don't realize how many ignore lists you're on.when you stated that only 3 people don't think I am a moron here you were being passive aggressive
Most of it is implied data, rather than objective data. That's where the message becomes suspect. I approached the article in a very hopeful manor, unfortunately it quickly devolved. At that point I thought "What's this person's background?" and then realized that he's a huckster. For people less open minded, they'll just look at the writer and immediately disregard whatever comes next. If you're interested in intelleigent discussion as you say, you'd want to make sure that people are actually going to be taking in what you're offering, which is why I suggested you leave peopel like that alone when there's more reuptable sources that will support your point of view.The article posted has some data that is interesting and the video I posted also has some interesting links and a timeline...If they are a nothingburger to you then fine, but attack the message and information instead of the messenger.
Not what I said, but enjoy the pity party you're having. Going on what, week 3 now?Regardless, if you actually think "I am a moron and only 3 people don't think I am" LMAO. Duly noted.
Not what I said, but enjoy the pity party you're having. Going on what, week 3 now?
Guys guys guys
Guys
For a beard, but probably not as strong as a shark.R u strong?
90 percent of this game is half mentalFor a beard, but probably not as strong as a shark.
I've got a hankering for some pic-a-nic baskets.90 percent of this game is half mental
I only looked at the data in the graphsMost of it is implied data, rather than objective data. That's where the message becomes suspect. I approached the article in a very hopeful manor, unfortunately it quickly devolved. At that point I thought "What's this person's background?" and then realized that he's a huckster. For people less open minded, they'll just look at the writer and immediately disregard whatever comes next. If you're interested in intelleigent discussion as you say, you'd want to make sure that people are actually going to be taking in what you're offering, which is why I suggested you leave peopel like that alone when there's more reuptable sources that will support your point of view.
First of all the fact you would know something like that is sad and speaks to the cliquey nature of this site.You apparently don't realize how many ignore lists you're on.
Intentionally skewed graphs aren't data.Opinions are just opinions...I don't link things for opinions, I linked that because it had some good graphs and data on a single link.
Weird. I thought discussion boards were for discussions. Apparently I was mistaken.Secondly I don't give a shit if people don't want to view my content, why would I care?
Then correct them if you want to discuss their inaccuracy.Intentionally skewed graphs aren't data.
If you'd acted like someone that was interested in discussion at the outset, rather than immediately hurling petty insults. That might have been a thing that happened. Instead, the new and improved thin skinned Rambo threw a tantrum. I hope you sort out whatever is going on with you.Then correct them if you want to discuss their inaccuracy.
That is discussion. If you don't want to discuss with that person you can not respond, or put them on ignore list.
Instead of discussion about the data and it's skew...you chose to attack the messenger.
Good read
haha
I love it, knew it would rile up the troops
I only looked at the data in the graphs
I broke himIf you'd acted like someone that was interested in discussion at the outset, rather than immediately hurling petty insults. That might have been a thing that happened. Instead, the new and improved thin skinned Rambo threw a tantrum. I hope you sort out whatever is going on with you.
honestly just tired of some of the forum antics...place is fairly toxic, you and I included at timesIf you'd acted like someone that was interested in discussion at the outset, rather than immediately hurling petty insults. That might have been a thing that happened. Instead, the new and improved thin skinned Rambo threw a tantrum. I hope you sort out whatever is going on with you.