I posted a Minnesota law offices explanation of what 3rd degree assault is specifically.That's why I read Minnesota Statute 609.02 subd. 10 instead of whatever you posted.
"Subd. 10.Assault.
"Assault" is:
(1) an act done with intent to cause fear in another of immediate bodily harm or death; or
(2) the intentional infliction of or attempt to inflict bodily harm upon another."
if you're going to disagree with the prosecutor/defense/judge about the definition of assault, I'd start with the actual statuteI posted a Minnesota law offices explanation of what 3rd degree assault is specifically.
Bad move, imo, respectfully.I posted a Minnesota law offices explanation of what 3rd degree assault is specifically.
Has he plead or been found guilty of 3rd degree assault?if you're going to disagree with the prosecutor/defense/judge about the definition of assault, I'd start with the actual statute
Subdivision 1.Substantial bodily harm.
Whoever assaults another and inflicts substantial bodily harm may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years or to payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both.
We're all going to find out together.Bad move, imo, respectfully.
Fuck ya we are.We're all going to find out together.
These fuckers ever going to make up their minds?Fuck ya we are.
Bunch of yentas gossiping probably.These fuckers ever going to make up their minds?
no, but Murder2 is killing someone in the commission of another felony, even if you haven't been specifically convicted or plead to that felony.Has he plead or been found guilty of 3rd degree assault?
@CMNHWishesHeWasVaccinated - there is literally no way for Chauvin to plead or be convicted of 3rd Degree Assault, because George Floyd is dead as a result of the crime. If he admits to the assault, he admits to Murder2.
Inappropriate to comment on it at all imo, but at least he waited until the jury was sequestered (unlike that idiot Maxine Waters).
The real crime isn't the killing. The real crime is vague statements about the killing that don't prejudice the trial in any way.
He said 'I hope the verdict is the right verdict' mete. We all know what he means but he didn't say which verdict.
Completely inappropriate while the trial is still ongoing.
OK meteHe said 'I hope the verdict is the right verdict' mete. We all know what he means but he didn't say which verdict.
So stop getting your panties twisted.
Shut up, Joe.
the only comment is one of faith in the American Justice System to do its job.Shut up, Joe.
You are a member of the executive branch.
Not the judicial.
if she was attorney general of the state, or a legislator there id agree
Completely inappropriate while the trial is still ongoing.
Bruh she isn't Joesph Biden, whom is being discussed, but she should have been brave enough to let the judicial branch do what it does before telling people to riot up front.if she was attorney general of the state, or a legislator there id agree
but because shes not, i dig what she said and wish others would do the same
i dont like maxine as she is a corporatist. corrupt dem
but she has a history of fighting for social issues. and i love that shes brave enough to express the views that many citizens and silent politicians share
oh i didnt hesr what she said actuallly. didnt know she called for riots.Bruh she isn't Joesph Biden, whom is being discussed, but she should have been brave enough to let the judicial branch do what it does before telling people to riot up front.