Society LA is on fire
- Thread starter Wild
- Start date
LA law requires that Pacific Palisades rebuilding after fires must include low-income housing
Housing and land use experts say a Los Angeles city law could require the Pacific Palisades to include “affordable” housing to replace older buildings.
justthenews.com
I am going to imagine that the construction industry is going to go nutz there in the coming year.
So much to rebuild.
So much to rebuild.
I see a lot of laws and ordinances being forgotten during the rebuild. The reason is that a lot of big-time CA Dem donors lost their homes. If they get fucked out of rebuilding by local or state government red tape, regulations, and ordinances...that is going to be a major kick in the teeth to the Dem establishment fundraising operation in the state.LA law requires that Pacific Palisades rebuilding after fires must include low-income housing
Housing and land use experts say a Los Angeles city law could require the Pacific Palisades to include “affordable” housing to replace older buildings.
And they gotta feed the monkey man, so they gonna move heaven and earth for their cronies.
As always, "One law for me...and my big donors...and one law for thee."
pretty much
Agree with he post above how they will be able to skirt the Cali red tape. But if a bunch of low income housing was built in their NIMBY utopia it would be great.LA law requires that Pacific Palisades rebuilding after fires must include low-income housing
Housing and land use experts say a Los Angeles city law could require the Pacific Palisades to include “affordable” housing to replace older buildings.
No doubt, most of the residents love that type of thing for others, but not themselves of course.
Here’s How Pacific Palisades Voted in The 2024 General Election
See How Ballots Were Cast in Palisades’ Five Voting Precincts By Zach Armstrong Preliminary results show how Pacific Palisades voted...
palisadesnews.com
Don't forget border walls.
And 10 new "super-cities....
Yeah, will be interesting to see what happens
It has gotten, I'd say critical, when people don't even try to listen to information.Well if Alex Jones says it...
1. Alex Jones was simply the producer.
2. If it had been Alex Jones that said it, it'd have been far more credible than MSM.
Gavin Newsom to Ban Plants Within 5 Feet of Homes in Fire-Prone Areas
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) plans to ban the use of plants within five feet of homes in what are designated as "fire-prone" areas.
www.breitbart.com
Now THAT is a very Gavin thing to do.Gavin Newsom to Ban Plants Within 5 Feet of Homes in Fire-Prone Areas
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) plans to ban the use of plants within five feet of homes in what are designated as "fire-prone" areas.
Yet nothing on flammable hair gel.
There was nothing nefarious about how those fires started. Nah.
View: https://twitter.com/RealAlexJones/status/1887922118878179595
View: https://twitter.com/RealAlexJones/status/1887922118878179595
So now we'll hear nothing about it again?
That seems to be the news cycle.
That seems to be the news cycle.
I guess there'll be follow up stories once the rebuilding begins, and if there's any fuckery that goes on regarding who gets to rebuild what.
"Extinguished LA fires continue to not burn at all" doesn't exactly get many clicks for that sweet ad revenue.