@Hot Lars send it to me, he disguised himself as cow to make new experiences or something...
Race discussion with Big.Thirsty
- Thread starter Leigh
- Start date
I told you
@Big.Thirsty , if
@Leigh "believes" he is right and then takes steps to call you out, you best pack the Winnebago for a month.....
Disclaimer: this in no way implies I agree with Leigh
@Big.Thirsty , if
@Leigh "believes" he is right and then takes steps to call you out, you best pack the Winnebago for a month.....Disclaimer: this in no way implies I agree with Leigh
Well he could have stopped me dead by providing a single definitive trait of a race. Debate over, I'd be happy to have learned something new.I told you
Disclaimer: this in no way implies I agree with Leigh
But he acknowledges there is no definitive trait. From the rest of his posts, I'm deducing that he bases his stance on averages but I feel I've provided ample explanation and examples to show that's erroneous. The guy was up late debating though and is getting some kip.
P
Punch
Guest
Human: fucked up.
Skeletal Remains Identification by Facial Reconstruction
Paper presented at the 9th Biennial Meeting of the International Association
for Craniofacial Identification, FBI, Washington, DC, July 24, 2000
Skeletal Remains Identification by Facial Reconstruction, by Phillips (Forensic Science Communications, January 2001)
Edit: Actually, 3c nails it.
I'm not an anthropologist. I can't answer that question within a reasonable degree of scientific certainty.So what race is this person?
You provided the definitions for each race. This person doesn't fit any of them.
And you glossed over the fact that I quoted a well-sourced article from the FBI that says racial characteristics are used for forensic identification.
P
Punch
Guest
I'm learning a lot in this thread. Mainly that most humans are fucking racist and suck.
I didn't gloss over it, I didn't even see it. There have been a lot of posts in this thread and I haven't read every single one.
However, I addressed that point earlier. You must have glossed over it.
I thought I pointed out at least 15 times its 2016 and we humans have been travelling the globe for a hundred thousand of years plus, lol
gheghiskhan.jpg
you are at least 10 times smarter than you started pretending to be around page 5, I am awake but not participating further on this thread, you are a flat earther when it comes to the genetic science of the past decade Leigh
You gave it an informative rating like an hour ago. Was that just for the pictures?
Edit: 3 hours ago. Sorry. Busy day.
Oh that one. I've been busy this afternoon. Ok, what point does that prove?
No, I'm simply asking you to demonstrate your stance. You haven't.
That the scientific community, specifically forensic anthropologists, agree that certain racial characteristics can be used to identify skeletal remains.
How is that not physical proof of race?
If we're going to use ad hominem comparisons, you debate like a religious person.
"Race is real"
"Please provide evidence"
"er....sickle cell?"