M
member 1013
Guest
If it makes you feel better, sure*sigh*
The news will fill you in eventually. They're taking you for a ride at the moment.
If it makes you feel better, sure*sigh*
The news will fill you in eventually. They're taking you for a ride at the moment.
None of our soldiers are going to fight Russia.Dude, nothing we're being told by anyone stands up to any analysis. You saw the reporter asking Ned Price not very hard questions which he just obfuscated instead of answering.
Ultimately I'm not going to pretend I have some vested interest in the Ukraine. What I do have vested interest in is not sending our soldiers off to die in yet another pointless war that costs us millions and millions of dollars.
I don't think anyone will be fighting. But you can bet your sweet, sweet, sweet ass if it goes down we'll be sending people there.None of our soldiers are going to fight Russia.
It’s actually two investigations, not a study.@Lars, are you going to post the study or what?
They’ve been fighting for eight years already. The Russian mercenaries in eastern Ukraine fight for a firm owned by the Russian Department of Defense. I don’t think the Canadian soldiers that were there “training” had any authorization to go on the front lines and fight, but I could be wrong. Everyone has already said we aren’t sending troops, Ukraine is not a NATO member so we simply cannot justify the risk. We will watch as they get steam rolled then fund their new Taliban, but we won’t fight Russia directly.I don't think anyone will be fighting. But you can bet your sweet, sweet, sweet ass if it goes down we'll be sending people there.
Post it so I can dissect it and disprove your proof.It’s actually two investigations, not a study.
Someone posted an article in the Q thread, check there. You’ll be able to find the two sources cited and then deep dive their mathematical models linguistic analysis.Post it so I can dissect it and disprove your proof.
lol. I'm not wading through that thread. The point is nobody knows exactly who was pulling the strings behind Q. You can use all the statistcal analyses you want. Until you can explain to me how two internet trolls were able to predict the minute of John McCain's death exactly one month prior to it happening, the mystery lives on.Someone posted an article in the Q thread, check there. You’ll be able to find the two sources cited and then deep dive their mathematical models linguistic analysis.
It’s on the last page, very recent “news.”lol. I'm not wading through that thread. The point is nobody knows exactly who was pulling the strings behind Q. You can use all the statistcal analyses you want. Until you can explain to me how two internet trolls were able to predict the minute of John McCain's death exactly one month prior to it happening, the mystery lives on.
This is coming from someone who only had the tiniest understanding of what the fuck Q was supposed to be, so explain like I'm a 5 year old please.lol. I'm not wading through that thread. The point is nobody knows exactly who was pulling the strings behind Q. You can use all the statistcal analyses you want. Until you can explain to me how two internet trolls were able to predict the minute of John McCain's death exactly one month prior to it happening, the mystery lives on.
Everything Q posted was cryptic. They're called breadcrumbs because they're usually bits of information that aren't intended to make sense until a later date. This is why the McCain post stuck out to me the most. It was posted on July 25, 2018 at 4:28 PM. John McCain was referenced as "No name."This is coming from someone who only had the tiniest understanding of what the fuck Q was supposed to be, so explain like I'm a 5 year old please.
When was this prediction made, and was it stated clearly or was it something that was found by "following the breadcrumbs" of one of those nonsensical looking Q posts?
I've never seen one of those postrs that made any actual sense (although I freely admit I haven't looked to hard at them).
It's a little misleading to say no one is sending troops. They're sending them to countries that border Ukraine. It's reminiscent of how we run training exercises in Ukraine and Russia is supposed to STFU, but when Russia does a training exercise near Ireland it's an act of aggression.They’ve been fighting for eight years already. The Russian mercenaries in eastern Ukraine fight for a firm owned by the Russian Department of Defense. I don’t think the Canadian soldiers that were there “training” had any authorization to go on the front lines and fight, but I could be wrong. Everyone has already said we aren’t sending troops, Ukraine is not a NATO member so we simply cannot justify the risk. We will watch as they get steam rolled then fund their new Taliban, but we won’t fight Russia directly.
NATO countries that border Ukraine that escaped the Russian orbit and for some reason get a little antsy when Russia is sabre rattling.It's a little misleading to say no one is sending troops. They're sending them to countries that border Ukraine. It's reminiscent of how we run training exercises in Ukraine and Russia is supposed to STFU, but when Russia does a training exercise near Ireland it's an act of aggression.
Oh, I'm not saying it's everyone in the Ukrainian government by any stretch. I'm just pointing out that it's false for talking heads to suggest it's completely untrue or that they don't have influence. One of my primary concerns about this whole situation is that you get sent over there to fight the Ruskies because Joey Joe needs to keep that natural gas flowin.But it's not all of Ukraine or even the primary government that is Nazis. It appears to be fascist elements inside of Ukraine that the government has appeased in order to maintain control and prevent a civil war. They should of course expel those voices long-term but my main point is that Putin using this contingent to paint the entirety of Ukraine as a Nazi regime needing Russia to save the ethnic Russian population is bullshit too.
Please don't misinterpret my post about us needing to realize that it takes a long learning from the west to understand Ukraine's intricacies as some sort of endorsement of Putin's propaganda.
"Conquering the world in self defense"NATO countries that border Ukraine that escaped the Russian orbit and for some reason get a little antsy when Russia is sabre rattling.
Ukraine has diplomatic ties with NATO; co-operative training missions between friends are not comparable to rolling up into the economic zone of a neutral state (that depends on the UK for naval defense) and doing live fire to wag your pee pee.
Anyone who thinks that they are is clearly retarded.None of our soldiers are going to fight Russia.
NATO won decades ago bruv."Conquering the world in self defense"
If that were true people wouldn't be explaining why it needs to keep growing.NATO won decades ago bruv.
the conquest wuz den.
People want in. It’s the cool club still.If that were true people wouldn't be explaining why it needs to keep growing.
"MuH RuSsIa!!!"
"Russia made"People want in. It’s the cool club still.
it’s not my fault russia made everybody in their “near abroad” hate them. The Holdomor was just a few decades ago.
The Russian near abroad is a term for the post soviet states used by Russia."Russia made"
Oh, no. It's all Russia's fault. It's not like America has been running some crazy media outlet since the 40's where any country that isn't directly in America's sphere of influence is spammed with propaganda. That would be crazy!The Russian near abroad is a term for the post soviet states used by Russia.
Analytics
The Valdai Discussion Club was established in 2004. It was named after Lake Valdai, which is located close to Veliky Novgorod, where the club’s first meeting took place. The club’s goal is to promote dialogue between Russian and international intellectual elite, and to make an independent...valdaiclub.com
Yea you know, they all loved the USSR, and imperial Russia before that. They were treated great. And yea you know, the current head of Russia is totally not a soviet relic who is bellicose about reclaiming the former Russian empire and dominating the former states of the USSR.
?