How many times with assumptions about me do you have to be wrong before you stop doing it?
I know it was part of the plan because of the Belarusian battle map as well as references to such in Russian state news stories posted in anticipation of a quick victory.
It was probably part of their original plan when this was going to be a quick endeavor. It might still be. And then it's also possible. They just want everyone to think that their big macho men and you better be lucky we didn't come over there.
Regardless, the source is Russia state media and their puppet Belarus. Not Twitter.
I guessed you were referring to the map and the twitter remark is about people circulating that it shows an invasion plan of Moldova. Which it doesn't.
It's unclear whether that map shows a plan for an invasion of Odessa from Transnistria or movement of troops from Odessa to Transnistria, but it is clear that nothing points inside the territory of Moldova itself. We also don't know if Luka was fucking with the Ukrainians and therefore us.
My point was simply that you don't 'know' anything of the sort you claim to know, you just 'think' something based on a poor reading of a potentially dubious map and random reports. You in fact think something that is 95% likely to be wrong
And when Russia almost certainly doesn't invade Moldova, will you admit you didn't know? Or, conveniently, will plans just have changed?