I’d gladly. But those powers were meant to be limited always and hard to amend. I and many other Americans care because we agree with the general philosophy of big R Republicanism, individual rights, checks and balances, and a limited federal government.
In Florida, a school just recommended that gay teachers don't have any pictures of their spouse and don't mention them in class due to disputes that could arise from parents on back of the Don't Say Gay bill
Links?In Florida, a school just recommended that gay teachers don't have any pictures of their spouse and don't mention them in class due to disputes that could arise from parents on back of the Don't Say Gay bill
A school is also sending out notifications to parents if there are any gay students going on a field trip
Texas is close to removing the right to get a BJ
You've payed attention to any politics of the last several years and have no reason to doubt any testimony highly televised in a political nature?
A functioning republicanism isn't defined by obstruction and delays, which has been the strategy of both parties via the filibuster threat for the last several decades. This is again a fairly recent innovation in parliamentary procedure and it doesn't accomplish what you seem to think it does. Having people on the record voting is important to holding them accountable during elections. Delaying or spiking legislative votes doesn't ensure that things remain status quo. More often it just results in bottlenecks in federal funding that end up leading to neglect of public interests. Decreasing the amount of voting on bills is the opposite of republicanism as it leads to more dealmaking in the name of compromise that ultimately manifests as more pork barrel legislation shoved into bills, more funds diverted into pet projects and superfluous tax liabilities that divert funds from more needed infrastructure. Passing laws more often than not does nothing to alter the course of our lives or change the way we function as human beings. It usually deals with what the government will spend money on and what it won't. In some cases, federal laws extend rights to groups whose states are denying them, but even that is mostly just about authorizing federal spending toward supporting those groups. It isn't moral or ethical sentiment restraining bills from coming to the floor to be voted on. It's lobbying pressure and deals made on behalf of those lobbyists to spend or not to spend in one direction or another. Again, it's not even the filibuster that we actually see. We see the threat of a filibuster preventing voting. This means debate is actively being suppressed, again not a cornerstone of republicanism and actually cancerous to checks and balances within the chamber. The biggest issue with these rules is that they restrict what the public can see as the real politics happens behind closed doors. That's not what republicanism was supposed to look like, either according to the founders or the ancient Romans.
You don’t think Trumps socialist policies and massive debt could have contributed to those issues?
Can't see shit and this isn't reporting
Dude, that’s the reflection of clouds on the window.
That was a joke ^
If you meant to say ‘shouldn’t ‘ then I agree.
That's small R. Big R is the party itself. The GOP loves big gov.
As someone who has already said Trump should be in jail. That's been most of the "reporting" on Trump since 2015.
I get so tired of everything being explosive new allegations, bombshell hearsay, anonymous sources, etc
Corroborating testimony from the guy who brought Trump's chief of staff's assistant's gardener their lunch.
Though I feel it necessary to mention that unnamed sources brought down another president, and given Trump's hatred of any media that dares to criticize him, and "I think it's a shame the Press can publish whatever it wants and somebody ought to look into doing something about that." ... well, I sense a pattern
Which president?
President Deepthroat. Anonymous sources broke the story that he was also a sexing a porn star.
Can I get you to bring this back in English, please?
