Society TMMAC Q-Tards?

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up

kaladin stormblessed

Nala fanboy
Apr 24, 2017
17,637
20,147
Never thought about this until mentioned in the video. One of the girls fears a scenario where Q advises everyone to take their own lives, and there is a mass suicide :(
 

kaladin stormblessed

Nala fanboy
Apr 24, 2017
17,637
20,147
Way to pander to mass hysteria.

More cult conflation.

Weird how they still can't attack Q posts.

Only messengers.

Pharisees are their own problem.
Serious question. Are your posts serious or are you just being silly?

Im pretty trusting. Or rather, gullible or maybe just dense. So I take people at their word. So sarcasm and humor often goes over my head

I took a hiatus for a few months, came back with a fresh mind, and think I now have a better grip on a bunch of the tmmacers here and their tone/delivery/intent yadda yadda

But you are still an anomaly to me

Am I correct to take most of your comments as serious statements?
 

The Pendulum

AI Posting
Dec 30, 2015
1,381
1,252
Serious question. Are your posts serious or are you just being silly?

Im pretty trusting. Or rather, gullible or maybe just dense. So I take people at their word. So sarcasm and humor often goes over my head

I took a hiatus for a few months, came back with a fresh mind, and think I now have a better grip on a bunch of the tmmacers here and their tone/delivery/intent yadda yadda

But you are still an anomaly to me

Am I correct to take most of your comments as serious statements?
Some.

Lots of things can be boiled down to exact statements.

Weird how there's been 4 years of attacks towards Q posts, and none refer to Q posts, only messengers, or "interpreters".

If it's such a baseless conspiracy, address the posts.

It's not that hard.

Instead, all they've (mainstream media) done is turn the light away from Epstein, Maxwell and their cohorts.

Leaving out the fact they were free to come and go in the Whitehouse as they pleased, through 3 Presidencies.

Forget about the fact u/maxwellhill on Reddit hasn't posted anything since a couple of days before she was arrested.

Forget about the fact that Disney offered scuba cruises to Little Saint James.

Forget about the fact that Slick Willy Clinton flew on the Lolita Express 26x.

Forget about the fact that Kevin Spacey and Maxwell have pics of them on the throne at Buckingham Palace.

Forget about the fact she attended Chelsea Clinton's wedding.

Forget about the fact she's tied up with Sylvia Earle through Terramar.

Sylvia Earle, who spent a lot of time with Maggie Nixon, and Obama at Martha's Vineyard.

Maggie Nixon, who's mother, Sarah, celebrates her birthday with James Alefantis.

Obama, who 10 years later bought the same property, despite climate warnings.

Must be a source of good memories.

Don't worry, it's all specualtion.


1611448572290.jpg

2014-8-7-podesta-2~2.jpg

Don't compare Mcanns pupils to Soros'.


CNN wouldn't lie to you.


View: https://youtu.be/jjDLcvOB1og
 

kaladin stormblessed

Nala fanboy
Apr 24, 2017
17,637
20,147
Some.

Lots of things can be boiled down to exact statements.

Weird how there's been 4 years of attacks towards Q posts, and none refer to Q posts, only messengers, or "interpreters".

If it's such a baseless conspiracy, address the posts.

It's not that hard.

Instead, all they've (mainstream media) done is turn the light away from Epstein, Maxwell and their cohorts.

Leaving out the fact they were free to come and go in the Whitehouse as they pleased, through 3 Presidencies.

Forget about the fact u/maxwellhill on Reddit hasn't posted anything since a couple of days before she was arrested.

Forget about the fact that Disney offered scuba cruises to Little Saint James.

Forget about the fact that Slick Willy Clinton flew on the Lolita Express 26x.

Forget about the fact that Kevin Spacey and Maxwell have pics of them on the throne at Buckingham Palace.

Forget about the fact she attended Chelsea Clinton's wedding.

Forget about the fact she's tied up with Sylvia Earle through Terramar.

Sylvia Earle, who spent a lot of time with Maggie Nixon, and Obama at Martha's Vineyard.

Maggie Nixon, who's mother, Sarah, celebrates her birthday with James Alefantis.

Obama, who 10 years later bought the same property, despite climate warnings.

Must be a source of good memories.

Don't worry, it's all specualtion.


View attachment 27650

View attachment 27654

Don't compare Mcanns pupils to Soros'.


CNN wouldn't lie to you.


View: https://youtu.be/jjDLcvOB1og
I don't go on reddit, so I'm not familiar with Qs posts

But didn't Q post a date which passed. And then another date which passed, etc?

And didn't Q anon allege to politicians being Satan worshipping petifiles that drink the blood of children?

Or is that stuff all just the Q fans making up theories, but not from Q itself?
 

The Pendulum

AI Posting
Dec 30, 2015
1,381
1,252
I don't go on reddit, so I'm not familiar with Qs posts

But didn't Q post a date which passed. And then another date which passed, etc?

And didn't Q anon allege to politicians being Satan worshipping petifiles that drink the blood of children?

Or is that stuff all just the Q fans making up theories, but not from Q itself?
Q posts weren't on Reddit.

Assumed dates, not confirmed. As an example;

11.3 could mean many things,
11 march,
3 November,
K.C

(Pdf re FBI investigation into ritual satanic abuse 1992)

Screenshot_20210212-174320~2.png

Easy to see how the overly dramatic would get swept up in the noise.
 

Rambo John J

Eats things that would make a Billy Goat Puke
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
71,883
71,728

Qat

QoQ
Nov 3, 2015
16,385
22,624
Weird how there's been 4 years of attacks towards Q posts, and none refer to Q posts, only messengers, or "interpreters".
While I don't think that no content and just the messenger was attacked here, you are seeing it the wrong way as well.
If someone thinks tarot cards are bullshit its normal to call someone using em a scam artist.
There is no need to delve into the realm of tarot to pick it apart to someone who will not see sense anyway.
In fact it's more to warn others from not falling into the trap.

This is just another tactic by worshippers who want people to delve into it and maybe a couple get hooked. Just as scientology and other crap cults.

The fact that you even had to write "interpreters" should tell you everything you need to know. It is vague, nebulous and mysterious by design for various reasons. Can you think of any?
If anybody wanted to bring truth to the world this is not how it would be done. It's as simple as that.

You even try to take on the same style of posting as a Q post. It's at the same time hilarious but also a sign how deep you are in, and that you are consciously or unconsciously trying to recruit new believers here.
 

The Pendulum

AI Posting
Dec 30, 2015
1,381
1,252
While I don't think that no content and just the messenger was attacked here, you are seeing it the wrong way as well.
If someone thinks tarot cards are bullshit its normal to call someone using em a scam artist.
There is no need to delve into the realm of tarot to pick it apart to someone who will not see sense anyway.
In fact it's more to warn others from not falling into the trap.

This is just another tactic by worshippers who want people to delve into it and maybe a couple get hooked. Just as scientology and other crap cults.

The fact that you even had to write "interpreters" should tell you everything you need to know. It is vague, nebulous and mysterious by design for various reasons. Can you think of any?
If anybody wanted to bring truth to the world this is not how it would be done. It's as simple as that.

You even try to take on the same style of posting as a Q post. It's at the same time hilarious but also a sign how deep you are in, and that you are consciously or unconsciously trying to recruit new believers here.
Facts presented in a socratic way.

Discussion is great.

Funny, really.


"Interpreters" is vague by design. There are many, many people who built a platform with a core of subscribers on this, whatever it was.

Austin Steinbart was a major example of persons profiting off Q posts. There were plenty more, and I'm sure many were posted by people in this thread. There was a running term "Q decoders", and many of these people were the ones selling merch. These were the people "leading the charge", the biggest targets to pin a label on.

It worked, to an extent.

Not unsurprisingly.

Here's a really fun, quick, thought experiment;

Remember the bitcoin scam last year?


Guess which high profile political/business personality didn't get hit?

Probably means pretty secure access to Trump's twitter account, right?

Screenshot_20210212-220618~2.png

61aa4a7cf99be5769779895db55ffb319bf7c74d330dad388823859f91dfd0ac.png

Screenshot_20210212-222248~2.png

143528eefa9090a369206d39bc06d2970304c10684c9aa659afa1cdf4a6f9d83.png
 

Qat

QoQ
Nov 3, 2015
16,385
22,624
Facts presented in a socratic way.

Discussion is great.

Funny, really.


"Interpreters" is vague by design. There are many, many people who built a platform with a core of subscribers on this, whatever it was.

Austin Steinbart was a major example of persons profiting off Q posts. There were plenty more, and I'm sure many were posted by people in this thread. There was a running term "Q decoders", and many of these people were the ones selling merch. These were the people "leading the charge", the biggest targets to pin a label on.

It worked, to an extent.

Not unsurprisingly.

Here's a really fun, quick, thought experiment;

Remember the bitcoin scam last year?


Guess which high profile political/business personality didn't get hit?

Probably means pretty secure access to Trump's twitter account, right?

View attachment 27664

View attachment 27663

View attachment 27667

View attachment 27666
I have no idea what you just posted after a couple of lines.

But since you know the Form you know that Platon created a framework of twisting information. I don't necessarily mean it's bad, it can help teaching people something, but it can also be misused.
And yeah you might also know that Psychologists use it on patients..., so crazy people are receptive to it? Heh.

And fyi the trend since a couple years to slap arrows and circles on every fucking picture or yt vid has been getting on my nerves from day one. I'm not an idiot devoid of any span of attention. So by default I avoid any Form of it, this included.

Having said all that I don't think you are a bad guy and don't wish to antagonize. But from time to time I will call bullshit.
 

The Pendulum

AI Posting
Dec 30, 2015
1,381
1,252
And fyi the trend since a couple years to slap arrows and circles on every fucking picture or yt vid has been getting on my nerves from day one. I'm not an idiot devoid of any span of attention. So by default I avoid any Form of it, this included.
I don't like lines everywhere, either.

You don't fake timestamps like this though.Screenshot_20210213-004253~2.png

Coordinated social media posts, from a secure media team. Really, really strange.

Here's likely the most fair, and impartial take on the Q post phenomenon, as it could be considered. The creator of this video has made a number of videos that have show off very overt connections between many of the people featured in Q posts, connected to unsavoury behaviour.

I dont care if you watch it, I've posted it in the thread before.


View: https://vimeo.com/441466994


Here's a couple of others, that don't specifically talk about Q, but feature prominent characters from the Epstein manga arc of the US politic era.


View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/m4uPgLMVI_g/



View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/SvAUa1FcvDk/



View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/kftvQhTH08U/



And here are his two most recent videos. Focusing rather specially on Maxwell, and one Microsoft ad featuree.


View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/v0dsbPnTdlwH/



View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/ppV7axR2ccET/




If all Q posts did was reach a few people in certian way that they'd start questioning the narrative a bit more, then it clearly worked.

You're watching a political administration, with a history of hiding people like Epstein and Maxwell's behaviours, as Maxwell starts an attempt to get out of prison because her jury isn't diverse enough.

They're burying a story about a sitting member of Congress sleeping with a CCP spy.

They're burying stories about Jen Psaki being related to a portfolio manager working at Citadel LLC.

They're trying to impeach a private citizen for what fact checkers have denoted at truth.

Assertions clearly are the foremost form of truth, at this point.

Damn whatever your eyes see.