My bad
Because gender is a protected class and prohibiting one gender from being able to defend themselves is morally reprehensible.
I SAID GOOD DAY SIR
If you think its up to the man, or the victim, to discourage violence with violence, we def have no commonality. It isn't the responsibility of men to "correct" women by hitting them back. Hitting back encourages violence moreso than nonaggression anyway, but read up on the issue. I'll try not to focus on the creepy vibe "this encourages her behavior" gives.
The difference in our understanding is the level of research we've done on the topic. You're slightly deficient on the issue and are just trying to apply broadstroke ethics to a nuanced problem within our society. I understand your position and held it myself before I learned more on the topic. If you research the issue and still disagree and have an actual social-psychological response to the question I am making beyond what you said I'll entertain more but otherwise agree to disagree.
The Duluth Model - Domestic Abuse Intervention Programs - DAIP
Poor oppressed men. Those special sad little snowflakes.
Ok now im seriously out of this debate.
Wait what
ohhhh sooky sooky nah!!!!
You should be. You resort to sarcasm and trying to belittle me, when you have less experience than me in the issues you debate (racism and self defence). You are not as smart as you seem to think you are and you struggle to maintain a logical argument, as evidenced by your strawman of posting DV links in a discussion about self defence.
Well now that's the cats out of the bag at least one person can tell everyone that I don't have a tan line.
You are not the arbitrator of acceptable female behavior. Just deal. You don't automatically deserve a justification of anything. If a person chooses to engage your sanctimonious questions, it's a choice. Just deal. You're still important
But but I protected Emmery against your slanderous(to me the humorless) racism inference!
I unwatched the thread, but it still apparently shows quoted replies. I am done debating the nuts and bolts. I offered you the ability to enhance your understanding of the issue by giving you access to the literal system which generated and explains my beliefs on the actual matter at hand. If you decline to look at it, that suggests things about your motives. I'd ask you to read about it to better understand what I can't explain to you.
I don't know why you're deep in your feelings now dude. We've had some good discussion, but you're straight up pouting here over a disagreement. Tighten up. I like you and don't want us to get all personal bro but im not great at coddling mufuckas on cage fighting forums. Maybe its a me problem but seriously I am not gonna powder ya ass. Tighten up. Nobody is taking white people, male, christian, rich people or any other dominant groups rights away by acknowledging privilege and you know that man. Im not coming at you heavy. I said agree to disagree a few times. Be chill.
This debate has gone as far as it can, so why don't we discuss what is really important like how Bellator is NOT going to last very long at their current rate.
I have no idea what you're referring to or talking about.You are not the arbitrator of acceptable female behavior. Just deal. You don't automatically deserve a justification of anything. If a person chooses to engage your sanctimonious questions, it's a choice. Just deal. You're still important
Oh, this goes both ways.You are not the arbitrator of acceptable female behavior. Just deal. You don't automatically deserve a justification of anything. If a person chooses to engage your sanctimonious questions, it's a choice. Just deal. You're still important
Oh, you're that(one) dude....
I'm not deep into feelings and I'm not asking you to mollycoddle me. You're making another logical faux pas (ad hominem) and I'm explaining the futality of that path to you.
I told him exactly what you tell people....I just use pictures because I like pictures
No, you were using sarcasm to belittle me and that really hurts. But I am NOT ASKING to be mollycoddled! Just held. I wanna be the little spoon ok?
While it should be obvious I've left the actual debate behind, and am just fucking around, this joke was still a lose lose in some contexts, because initially I was going to say at the bottom "LOL Leigh jk bro" to keep you from being butthurt in the response, but coddling you like that after a coddling discussion opened the doors to you being offended by the coddling itself. So I opted to leave the jay kay bro disclaimer out.
Look, I apologize for being sarcastic and mean.
I leave you to ponder if I was sarcastic there or not.
Get the fuck all the way out of here. A person who can't attribute validation of opposing opinions ain't worth shit. I need more wine and am
he's quite non salty with non bossy females and bros. real talk.
A FUCKING RAINBOW@MelE5150 ....A FUCKING RAINBOW!!!!!
