Some are. Being Jewish is not a prerequisite for living in or being from Israel.Are Israelis Jewish?
No, because race is defined by physical appearance.Could anti-Semitism be a version of racism if one (of "both") definition is children of Israel?
Do you support the proud boys?Some are. Being Jewish is not a prerequisite for living in or being from Israel.
No, because race is defined by physical appearance.
I don't know enough about them to have a strong opinion one way or the other. Horrible name though.Do you support the proud boys?
Damn bruh...People in the black community hate Candace Owens because she does't toe the Black line. She thinks and expresses herself differently than the masses. She believes that minorities shouldn't be pittied, and that in this country, we have the opportunity to become anything we choose. The same goes for me.
DAMNGood Lord does she hit the nail on the head with this one. Amazing.
View: https://twitter.com/realcandaceo/status/1046834082229800960?s=21
Tbh if you put a Palestinian and an Israeli next to each other, I can't tell the difference.Some are. Being Jewish is not a prerequisite for living in or being from Israel.
No, because race is defined by physical appearance.
I have no clue what you two are speaking about but in the interest of accuracy youIt isn't both, it's only one. Race is defined as physical characteristics. There are no physical characteristics that would denote someone as being a Jew. This is why after you said "it's both" I asked you to describe what a Jew looks like.
Hating Jews makes you an anti-Semite, and a piece of shit. Not a racist.
I think you should read a little more about MLK.Steele, Thomas and Carson have all been regarded as Uncle Tom's. If Eldridge were around in today's climate, he'd be called one too. Of course so would MLK.
Racism is exaggerated. That's not at all to suggest that it doesn't exist, but some forms of it are grossly over represented.
I've read quite a bit. He was a well known black conservative who had a pretty low opinion of the black culture of the masses.I think you should read a little more about MLK.
No one could. They're even from the same patch of dirt.Tbh if you put a Palestinian and an Israeli next to each other, I can't tell the difference.
and if they gave up their faith tomorrow, they'd still carry that gene. I understand why some people conflate race and religion, but it's incorrect to do so. It's also not correct when someone says "You're racist because you don't like people from *insert place here*." I can't think of any place on earth where everyone looks the same.I have no clue what you two are speaking about but in the interest of accuracy you may be interested in the fact that high order Jews do carry a specific physical gene
that denotes them as coming from a specific high priest line.
And ladies and gentlemen - example of "erasure".I've read quite a bit. He was a well known black conservative who had a pretty low opinion of the black culture of the masses.
You shouldn't use words improperly.And ladies and gentlemen - example of "erasure".
LOL. Ok.You shouldn't use words that you don't understand.
Have you ever noticed the way he dressed and spoke? He believed that had to be done to be taken seriously, and thought anyone not doing the same wasn't helping the cause. Same with the music he thought the people of his community should listen to (classical and gospel). He believed in, and owned, firearms ownership for self protection. If you do just a little digging it isn't hard to find out why there's MLK day instead of Malcolm X.You shouldn't change history that you don't understand.
You shouldn't make up facts to suit your agenda.
Again, I think you need to read some more. Don't have time right now, but I can safely say if we timeshunted him from April, 1968 to present, many of the vocal members of this forum would hate him.I've read quite a bit. He was a well known black conservative who had a pretty low opinion of the black culture of the masses.
I'd agree with that, as well as the radical right.What’s funny is, this post exemplifies one of Owens talking points. You cant have an opinion that differs from the radical left, or you’re immediately labeled. Respectfully debate? Agree to disagree? Nah, fuck that.
One of the many reasons i respect @Kneeblock so much. He presents an opinion, debates it respectfully, tries to educate, but doesn’t attack anyone if they disagree.
So what am I kwing? A hypocrite? Racist? Nazi? Label me brother. And don’t use dumb redneck, because I’ve already labeled myself that here many times here. That one is taken.