It's not enough to pay for social programs, he also wants to make sure he's taking money from rich people. It's right there in a post that he's pretending means something different.100% is a little steep dontcha think?
It's not enough to pay for social programs, he also wants to make sure he's taking money from rich people. It's right there in a post that he's pretending means something different.100% is a little steep dontcha think?
gotta punish those fuckers for being too successful and productiveIt's not enough to pay for social programs, he also wants to make sure he's taking money from rich people. It's right there in a post that he's pretending means something different.
Make no mistake. Most of those inviduals at the highest points are making their money on dog shit rent seeking behavior. That being said, cutting them down isn't going to magically change the courses of those at the bottom.gotta punish those fuckers for being too successful and productive
I find it ironic that a guy who seems to be extremely distrustful of the government feels so strongly that they should be in charge of more stuff.who the fuck is going to pay a 100% tax? that is never going to happen
as if they just arent going to hide their money and get creative with the accounting so that they persoanlly make 49.9 mil per year and the rest goes into the wifes name or a swiss bank account. no one is going to give up 100% of millions of dollars . billionaires fund both sides,right and left and this kind of shit will never fly no matter who is in powerMake no mistake. Most of those inviduals at the highest points are making their money on dog shit rent seeking behavior. That being said, cutting them down isn't going to magically change the courses of those at the bottom.
Just wait until Hillary finds out he's trying to take her money.as if they just arent going to hide their money and get creative with the accounting so that they persoanlly make 49.9 mil per year and the rest goes into the wifes name or a swiss bank account. no one is going to give up 100% of millions of dollars . billionaires fund both sides,right and left and this kind of shit will never fly no matter who is in power
Depends on why... in Warren's case no in theory yes
100% is a little steep dontcha think?
"Go back to like the second page. He doesn't care about funding social services."It's there in black and white, and you're still denying it. Hilarious.
I said I want bothIt's not enough to pay for social programs, he also wants to make sure he's taking money from rich people. It's right there in a post that he's pretending means something different.
^ this is what media conditioning does to a person's mindgotta punish those fuckers for being too successful and productive
It was almost that high in the fdr adminwho the fuck is going to pay a 100% tax? that is never going to happen
says the guy who gets 100% of his info from obscure youtubers^ this is what media conditioning does to a person's mind
Why not?Make no mistake. Most of those inviduals at the highest points are making their money on dog shit rent seeking behavior. That being said, cutting them down isn't going to magically change the courses of those at the bottom.
do you ever directly answer a question?It was almost that high in the fdr admin
I'm for emplimenting my tax policy by constitutional amendment as to bypass shit representativesI find it ironic that a guy who seems to be extremely distrustful of the government feels so strongly that they should be in charge of more stuff.
It wouldn't happen if I was in chargeas if they just arent going to hide their money and get creative with the accounting so that they persoanlly make 49.9 mil per year and the rest goes into the wifes name or a swiss bank account. no one is going to give up 100% of millions of dollars . billionaires fund both sides,right and left and this kind of shit will never fly no matter who is in power
Are u asking me what is my ideal or what do I think can actually get done?Act like I don't get it...because I don't. What's the right way to do it?
Its 50 mil not billion because more than that leads to inordinate influence and monopoliesWhy 50 billion?
Why not just tax 100% on anything over $99,999
After all why should some people be allowed to keep 6 figures?
you will never be in charge so this is all bullshitIt wouldn't happen if I was in charge
I'm talking about my ideal here not what I thinks going to happen