General Corona virus updates

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up

Filthy

Iowa Wrestling Champion
Jun 28, 2016
27,507
29,632
Not downplaying anything but we do need balanced viewpoints from experts to gain full perspective

https://off-guardian.org/2020/03/28...CJ7jrWMC1ljf-vgPMd3jGDu44SQs7gzug6syIbDVSzIxJ

"Importantly, the results we present here suggest the ongoing epidemics in the UK and Italy started at least a month before the first reported death and have already led to the accumulation of significant levels of herd immunity in both countries. There is an inverse relationship between the proportion currently immune and the fraction of the population vulnerable to severe disease."

– Fundamental principles of epidemic spread highlight the immediate need for large-scale serological surveys to assess the stage of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic, 24th March 2020



"[P]rojections of the death toll could plausibly be orders of magnitude too high […] The true fatality rate is the portion of those infected who die, not the deaths from identified positive cases.

The latter rate is misleading because of selection bias in testing. The degree of bias is uncertain because available data are limited. But it could make the difference between an epidemic that kills 20,000 and one that kills two million.

[…]

A universal quarantine may not be worth the costs it imposes on the economy, community and individual mental and physical health. We should undertake immediate steps to evaluate the empirical basis of the current lockdowns."


“Is the Coronavirus as Deadly as They Say?”, Wall Street Journal, 24th March 2020
they're confusing optimism with data.
 

Rambo John J

Baker Team
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
73,932
73,434
they're confusing optimism with data.
Time will tell

I think that is certainly true about part of their message and statements.

But the data is also being used by some to fuel pessimistic predictions as well(I think you disagree about this but that is my belief)

It is likely that truth lies somewhere in the middle between the extremes
 

Filthy

Iowa Wrestling Champion
Jun 28, 2016
27,507
29,632
Time will tell

I think that is certainly true about part of their message and statements.

But the data is also being used by some to fuel pessimistic predictions as well(I think you disagree about this but that is my belief)

It is likely that truth lies somewhere in the middle between the extremes
the relevant skill is being able to analyze trends and determine how far before or after the inflection point we are on a logistics curve.

everything else is meaningless spin. All of the data I've seen indicates that it will be awhile before we hit the inflection point.
 

Atto

Chinese Virus
Feb 11, 2016
4,750
5,551
Can anybody answer my question.
How come in China it didn't leave wuhan and infect other provinces in china?, but Infected the whole world.
I say they sent infected people to other parts of the world.
 

ThatOneDude

Commander in @Chief, Dick Army
First 100
Jan 14, 2015
35,390
34,114
Can anybody answer my question.
How come in China it didn't leave wuhan and infect other provinces in china?, but Infected the whole world.
I say they sent infected people to other parts of the world.
Because you can't trust the story coming from the Chinese government.
 

Rambo John J

Baker Team
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
73,932
73,434
the relevant skill is being able to analyze trends and determine how far before or after the inflection point we are on a logistics curve.

everything else is meaningless spin. All of the data I've seen indicates that it will be awhile before we hit the inflection point.
I hear ya
different countries and possible even different states are producing data in different ways

Some are not attributing a death by an unhealthy and/or elderly person who is positive for corona to corona...some are attributing any hospital stay and any death by a person with corona positive to be due to corona. In that way the data is harder to crunch and rely upon.

Regardless I think full on pessimism isn't healthy, same for blind optimism.

I merely posted a link to some "experts" discussing their view of the reaction...Experts have a wide array of opinions of this event and they are all using some form of Data to come to those conclusions.
 

Rambo John J

Baker Team
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
73,932
73,434
Can anybody answer my question.
How come in China it didn't leave wuhan and infect other provinces in china?, but Infected the whole world.
I say they sent infected people to other parts of the world.
Because you can't trust the story coming from the Chinese government.
Both are true
Lots of flights direct to Italy for Made In Italy factories full of chinese labor.

My dad likely caught it in december from sitting next to a asian woman on an flight wearing a mask.

No Government is gonna shoot straight about it, that isn't how governments work...control the message, control the people.

China is probably the worst with propaganda currently, but not in any way the only untrustworthy one.

I don't think it stayed in Wuhan.
 

Filthy

Iowa Wrestling Champion
Jun 28, 2016
27,507
29,632
I hear ya
different countries and possible even different states are producing data in different ways

Some are not attributing a death by an unhealthy and/or elderly person who is positive for corona to corona...some are attributing any hospital stay and any death by a person with corona positive to be due to corona. In that way the data is harder to crunch and rely upon.

Regardless I think full on pessimism isn't healthy, same for blind optimism.

I merely posted a link to some "experts" discussing their view of the reaction...Experts have a wide array of opinions of this event and they are all using some form of Data to come to those conclusions.
agree, but the only way to support their assumption is with tests that aren't being done yet, seralogical tests to show which people have antibodies. But mathematically, I don't see how it's possible to have this presumptive herd immunity when we have a population of infected that's doubling every 3 days. There's just not enough people in the sum of every previous iteration, even if we assume 50% of the people who get it never know they have it, to generate that much herd immunity. There would be spikes in other areas of medical care...'not looking' doesn't explain 3 or more orders of magnitude between measured and assumed.
 

Lukewarm Carl

TMMAC Addict
Aug 7, 2015
31,000
51,649
But the data is also being used by some to fuel pessimistic predictions as well
Pessimistic predictions are also the safe play.

You could pitch to Barry Bonds when he was fully juiced, batting .380, and slugging a million with runners on 2nd and 3rd or you could walk him and pitch to Jeff Kent who was a talented hitter but not the monster that Bonds was.

Getting people to pay attention by talking about how bad it could be and trying to get them to keep their asses at home as much as possible is akin to walking Bonds. Kent may still beat you but it's probably better than letting Bonds hit one into the water in right field.
 

Rambo John J

Baker Team
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
73,932
73,434
agree, but the only way to support their assumption is with tests that aren't being done yet, seralogical tests to show which people have antibodies. But mathematically, I don't see how it's possible to have this presumptive herd immunity when we have a population of infected that's doubling every 3 days. There's just not enough people in the sum of every previous iteration, even if we assume 50% of the people who get it never know they have it, to generate that much herd immunity. There would be spikes in other areas of medical care...'not looking' doesn't explain 3 or more orders of magnitude between measured and assumed.
right on, I hear ya

That article wasn't only about herd immunity, that was just a small part.

Lots of different viewpoints and previous data was in there...I probably picked the worst ones to post, but I wanted to put up some examples of what was in the link
 

Rambo John J

Baker Team
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
73,932
73,434
Pessimistic predictions are also the safe play.

You could pitch to Barry Bonds when he was fully juiced, batting .380, and slugging a million with runners on 2nd and 3rd or you could walk him and pitch to Jeff Kent who was a talented hitter but not the monster that Bonds was.

Getting people to pay attention by talking about how bad it could be and trying to get them to keep their asses at home as much as possible is akin to walking Bonds. Kent may still beat you but it's probably better than letting Bonds hit one into the water in right field.
haha, I hear ya
nice analogy

Time will tell how effective the safe play is and what repercussions it had on the virus and the economy.

I do know you had to walk bonds back in that era, or that shit ends up in the bay chased by dudes in kayaks.
 
M

member 1013

Guest
Can anybody answer my question.
How come in China it didn't leave wuhan and infect other provinces in china?, but Infected the whole world.
I say they sent infected people to other parts of the world.
Because China full of shit
 

Atto

Chinese Virus
Feb 11, 2016
4,750
5,551
u can catch a cold if:
  • A person with a cold sneezes, coughs, or blows their nose near you
  • You touch your nose, eyes, or mouth after you have touched something contaminated by the virus, such as a toy or doorknob

People are most contagious for the first 2 to 3 days of a cold. A cold is most often not contagious after the first week.
There are billion cases of common cold in usa per year.
So imagine.
 

BeardOfKnowledge

The Most Consistent Motherfucker You Know
Jul 22, 2015
60,554
56,071
Can anybody answer my question.
How come in China it didn't leave wuhan and infect other provinces in china?, but Infected the whole world.
I say they sent infected people to other parts of the world.
China quarantined Wuhan. Splinty @Splinty talked about it before, China is pretending like it's under control, but really they're just going to make it worse. Again.