General Electile Dysfunction: an election that lasts longer than 4 days is a serious medical problem

  • Thread starter Deleted member 1
  • Start date
Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up
D

Deleted member 1

Guest

Man, he really had some enemies in that place.
I always wondered why coworkers would GO TO THE NEWS over something like this. HR, manage it, fire, whatever. That'd be normal. None of us would make national news over this.

Then there's this...they did hate him...


View: https://twitter.com/SopaDeTHC/status/1326956810197114880
 

BeardOfKnowledge

The Most Consistent Motherfucker You Know
Jul 22, 2015
60,724
56,229
Just makin jokes, doc.
 
D

Deleted member 1

Guest


Rule 3.1: Meritorious Claims & Contentions

Share this:

Advocate

A lawyer shall not bring or defend a proceeding, or assert or controvert an issue therein, unless there is a basis in law and fact for doing so that is not frivolous, which includes a good faith argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law. A lawyer for the defendant in a criminal proceeding, or the respondent in a proceeding that could result in incarceration, may nevertheless so defend the proceeding as to require that every element of the case be established.
 
D

Deleted member 1

Guest
tHeY cAnT dO tHaT
which of you was arguing that a legit law firm wouldn't take a bullshit case?
See above.
Apparently its legit against the bar rules to do so.
You can force clarification as defense, which might feel like bullshit. But its intent is to prove the case.
You can't prove the case with bullshit.
 
D

Deleted member 1

Guest

This is a national security issue.

BeardOfKnowledge @Thor Georgeos
okay you were right. This is good with me


View: https://twitter.com/HopeSeck/status/1326979737022046208


What do you think ThatOneDude @ThatOneDude ?
 

ThatOneDude

Commander in @Chief, Dick Army
First 100
Jan 14, 2015
35,390
34,114
which of you was arguing that a legit law firm wouldn't take a bullshit case?
See above.
Apparently its legit against the bar rules to do so.
You can force clarification as defense, which might feel like bullshit. But its intent is to prove the case.
You can't prove the case with bullshit.
That was me :D
 

Belobog

First 100
First 100
Jan 14, 2015
759
1,445
"He then proceeded to press them on whether Republican legislatures could pick pro-Trump electors in a handful of key states and deliver him the electoral votes he needs to change the math and give him a second term, according to people briefed on the discussion."