Gee, I wonder why people don't take legacy media seriously.Please stop lying for attention
Its hilarious to pretend you're disgusted by liars but also lie constantly.
Gee, I wonder why people don't take legacy media seriously.Please stop lying for attention
When you say "legacy media" do you mean dicksucking.org ?Gee, I wonder why people don't take legacy media seriously.
Its hilarious to pretend you're disgusted by liars but also lie constantly.
Gee, I wonder why people don't take legacy media seriously.
It's not a dig. You started pontificating about something you're often guilty of. Rather than trying to make a big thing of it I just asked you plainly to stop. Rather than take the hint you decided that you'd invoke your "angry liar" persona. Civil conversation is something you haven't ever attempted to have with anyone since you joined this forum all that time ago although most of us wish you would.I explained it for you about 6 posts ago but you are permanently pre menstrual and would rather make little digs than engage in civil conversation.
Fools to the left of meRetards to the left
Retards to the right
Retards, all day
Retards, all night
That's part of it, yes. Legacy media would be any old timey platform media group who is mostly getting by on their past reputation rather than their current journalism work.When you say "legacy media" do you mean dicksucking.org ?
You're very welcome, they.@CMNHWishesHeWasVaccinated I'd like to respectfully thank you for your confirmation.
Thank you for respectfully respecting the true me.they
These people also rate MediaMatters as highly factual, which is not true, even objectively.
But what else would you expect from an amateur attempt to legitimize propaganda?
"The Columbia Journalism Review describes Media Bias/Fact Check as an amateur attempt at categorizing media bias and Van Zandt as an "armchair media analyst."[2] The Poynter Institute notes, "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific."[4] Alexandra Kitty, in a 2018 book on journalism, described MBFC as an apparent "amateur/civic outfit" and wrote that its founder's only qualification was a degree in communications.[3]"
Media Bias/Fact Check - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Longest article everCheck out this shit @ThatOneDude Time magazine is a crazy right wing conspiracy rag, right?
The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
For more than a year, a loosely organized coalition of operatives scrambled to shore up America’s institutionstime.com
Check out this shit @ThatOneDude Time magazine is a crazy right wing conspiracy rag, right?
The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
For more than a year, a loosely organized coalition of operatives scrambled to shore up America’s institutionstime.com
It's admission that after months of denying it, there was in fact a concerted effort to work against a single candidate.What do you have a problem with here?
Their work touched every aspect of the election. They got states to change voting systems and laws and helped secure hundreds of millions in public and private funding. They fended off voter-suppression lawsuits, recruited armies of poll workers and got millions of people to vote by mail for the first time. They successfully pressured social media companies to take a harder line against disinformation and used data-driven strategies to fight viral smears. They executed national public-awareness campaigns that helped Americans understand how the vote count would unfold over days or weeks, preventing Trump’s conspiracy theories and false claims of victory from getting more traction. After Election Day, they monitored every pressure point to ensure that Trump could not overturn the result.
Should we overturn it?!?!?It's admission that after months of denying it, there was in fact a concerted effort to work against a single candidate.
Not my opinion, not a secret conspiracy, its right out in the open.
The last two lines.What do you have a problem with here?
When everything stated before the last two lines are done in good faith and unbiased/ bi partisan, we don’t have any issues whatsoever. “Recruiting armies of poll workers” and pressuring social media companies to change their algorithms to suppress any damaging info on their candidate, doesn’t seem like they wanted a fair election at all. I mean it’s all right there in front of you and you refuse to even see it. If the roles were reversed and had big tech, msm, Hollywood, etc all work together to suppress damaging info on trump and silence Biden and his supporters, I think you might see the problem then.preventing Trump’s conspiracy theories and false claims of victory from getting more traction. After Election Day, they monitored every pressure point to ensure that Trump could not overturn the result.
The last two lines.
When everything stated before the last two lines are done in good faith and unbiased/ bi partisan, we don’t have any issues whatsoever. “Recruiting armies of poll workers” and pressuring social media companies to change their algorithms to suppress any damaging info on their candidate, doesn’t seem like they wanted a fair election at all. I mean it’s all right there in front of you and you refuse to even see it. If the roles were reversed and had big tech, msm, Hollywood, etc all work together to suppress damaging info on trump and silence Biden and his supporters, I think you might see the problem then.
“That’s why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream–a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it.”Check out this shit @ThatOneDude Time magazine is a crazy right wing conspiracy rag, right?
The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
For more than a year, a loosely organized coalition of operatives scrambled to shore up America’s institutionstime.com
They are fortifying future votes. Get it right.Republicans have gerrymandered every election since Bush senior though. They rigged Florida on 2020 too. They are also trying to rig future votes. They also openly admit it.
“That’s why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream–a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it.”
oh. So they were just fortifying it. Thanks for the clarification. All is good then. Trump tards really are all batshit crazy qtards.