General Corona virus updates

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up

BeardOfKnowledge

The Most Consistent Motherfucker You Know
Jul 22, 2015
61,172
56,519
again, back to the hypothetical. Is HK or Singapore locking 10% of their citizens in their homes and telling them "You don't need to work..."

for someone who claims to have a hard time pretending, you seem to have a knack for it.
Not hypothetical. New Zealand locked 100% of their people in their homes. But the banks were unaffected so you know, its negligible about how much "market interference" there is.

You should move to New Zealand or Austrlia and open a rifle company. Let me know about all that free market.
 

FINGERS

Banned
Nov 14, 2019
17,004
19,818
again, back to the hypothetical. Is HK or Singapore locking 10% of their citizens in their homes and telling them "You don't need to work..."

for someone who claims to have a hard time pretending, you seem to have a knack for it.

His hearing isn't great tbf.
 

Grateful Dude

TMMAC Addict
May 30, 2016
8,929
14,285
Got my Moderna #1 at 8am this morning. I drove to a small town outside of Austin, and there were only like 5 people there to get the vaccine (which was awesome compared to what I've heard about lines at the larger facilities here in town).

And I'm glad to say that my free microchip is working perfectly. I popped up on the map as soon as they stuck the needle in!
 

Rambo John J

Baker Team
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
76,422
75,630
Got my Moderna #1 at 8am this morning. I drove to a small town outside of Austin, and there were only like 5 people there to get the vaccine (which was awesome compared to what I've heard about lines at the larger facilities here in town).

And I'm glad to say that my free microchip is working perfectly. I popped up on the map as soon as they stuck the needle in!
Micro chip will come in next years rona booster shots

This initial round is mostly saline solution or holy water depending upon region and occupation
 

Rambo John J

Baker Team
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
76,422
75,630
1/ Masks ARE political. They have no basis in science—except perhaps political science—and have ZERO impact on COVID deaths or cases. Pitched as no-cost interventions they are in-truth linked to incredible societal harms--visited in proportion to their adoption.
Image





2/ While there is no linkage between masking and COVID deaths, they are linked to ultra-low levels of in-person schooling. If these two charts were flipped, masks would be a no-brainer. That they are not means masks—and the fear they generate—are causing grave harm.

Image
 

Attachments

Last edited:

Rambo John J

Baker Team
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
76,422
75,630
this is not science, there is no control group.

there's ample evidence that masks work when people aren't lied to and told that masks don't work because Dr Fauci and Pres Trump don't want to admit they fucked up.
I disagree

Can you honestly dispute and disregard all the data in that twitter thread?

Lots of stuff that is now "covid fact" wasn't science either
 

Rambo John J

Baker Team
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
76,422
75,630
yes. easily. I'm not impressed with the size of your data.

it's not science.
Not my Data brother...just a thread I read on twitter...it has 32 posts and counting, read them all if you "wanna get on my level" haha


Not to worry though...the size of "my" Data is only increasing by the day, week, month, year...The data is getting Yuge


I do not think they are nearly as effective as many believe them to be, studies with control groups had been done previous to 2020 and we both know what they showed.
 

Filthy

Iowa Wrestling Champion
Jun 28, 2016
27,504
29,656
Not my Data brother


Not to worry though...the size of "my" Data is only increasing by the day, week, month, year...The data is getting Yuge


I do not think they are nearly as effective as many believe them to be, studies with control groups had been done previous to 2020 and we both know what they showed.
yes, that masks are effective at slowing the spread and severity of the virus by reducing the amount of inoculum transmitted, and that effect is stronger when social distancing, public sanitation, and contact tracing are employed.

the amount of data is growing, but the information hasn't changed.
 

Rambo John J

Baker Team
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
76,422
75,630
yes, that masks are effective at slowing the spread and severity of the virus by reducing the amount of inoculum transmitted, and that effect is stronger when social distancing, public sanitation, and contact tracing are employed.

the amount of data is growing, but the information hasn't changed.
Filthy please stop being like this
My data is going limp


On the real she makes some great points if you read the whole thread, I am sure you would agree with some of it
 

Filthy

Iowa Wrestling Champion
Jun 28, 2016
27,504
29,656
Filthy please stop being like this
My data is going limp



On the real she makes some great points if you read the whole thread, I am sure you would agree with some of it
i read it, but I don't think she reaches any scientific conclusions. It reads like someone working backwards through the data for confirmation.
 

Rambo John J

Baker Team
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
76,422
75,630
i read it, but I don't think she reaches any scientific conclusions. It reads like someone working backwards through the data for confirmation.
At least you read/scanned the thread

She references CDC studies that contradict your statement a few posts above

Anyways there is some good data in that thread, I can't just toss it all away

She obviously has a stance and is looking for ways to back it, which is completely normal for this topic
 

Filthy

Iowa Wrestling Champion
Jun 28, 2016
27,504
29,656
Rambo John J @Rambo John J

look at her "source" for data...

"FB Survey: estimated number of people around you wearing masks"

LoL - no wonder that moron couldn't finish her degree. She loves to appear Science, without doing any actual work.
 

Filthy

Iowa Wrestling Champion
Jun 28, 2016
27,504
29,656
At least you read/scanned the thread

She references CDC studies that contradict your statement a few posts above

Anyways there is some good data in that thread, I can't just toss it all away

She obviously has a stance and is looking for ways to back it, which is completely normal for this topic
CDC is 100% a political source, they're not doing science either.
 

Rambo John J

Baker Team
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
76,422
75,630
Rambo John J @Rambo John J

look at her "source" for data...

"FB Survey: estimated number of people around you wearing masks"

LoL - no wonder that moron couldn't finish her degree. She loves to appear Science, without doing any actual work.
Not everything on those tweets is from Facebook and you know it

FB survey is better than nothing at all...I suspect much of those claims may hold up if a complete study was done including control groups

I consider those tweets food for thought even if the data gathered isn't concrete

I posted "science" because I don't think much of what is touted as covid "science" can be relied upon at this time, it was mostly a troll and you weren't/aren't the fish I am targeting.